|
|

|
|
History of Photography
Introduction
History of Photography
A World History of Photography
The Story Behind the Pictures 1827-1991
Photographers' Dictionary


|
|
THE STORY BEHIND THE PICTURES 1827-1991
|
|
1 Nicephore Niepce. View from the Study Window, 1827
2 Louis-Jacques-Mande Daguerre. Boulevard du Temple, 1838
3 Eugene Durieu/Eugene Delacroix. Nude from Behind, ca. 1853
4 Duchenne de Boulogne. Contractions musculaires, 1856
5 Auguste Rosalie Bisson. The Ascent of Mont Blanc, 1862
6 Nadar. Sarah Bernhardt, ca. 1864
7 Francois Aubert. Emperor Maximilian's Shirt, 1867
8 Andre Adolphe Eugene Disderi. Dead Communards, 1871
9 Maurice Guibert. Toulouse-Lautrec in His Studio, ca. 1894
10 Max Priester/Willy Wilcke. Bismarck on his Deathbed, 1898
11 Heinrich Zille. The Wood Gatherers, 1898
12 Alfred Stieglitz. The Steerage, 1907
13 Lewis Hine. Girl Worker in a Carolina Cotton Mill, 1908
14 August Sander. Young Farmers, 1914
15 Paul Strand. Blind Woman, 1916
16 Man Ray. Noire et blanche, 1926
17 Andre Kertesz. Meudon, 1928
18 Robert Capa. Spanish Loyalist, 1936
19 Dorothea Lange. Migrant Mother,
Nipomo, California, 1936
20 Horst P. Horst. Mainbocher Corset, 1939
21 Henri Cartier-Bresson. Germany, 1945
22 Richard Petersen. View from the Dresden City Hall Tower, 1945
23 Robert Doisneau. The Kiss in Front of City Hall, 1950
24 Dennis Stock. James Dean on Times Square, 1955
25 Bert Stern. Marilyn's Last Sitting, 1962
26 Gerard Malanga. Andy Warhol and The Velvet Underground, 1966
27 Helmut Newton. They're Coming!,
1981
28 Sandy Skoglund. Revenge of the Goldfish, 1981
29 Robert Mapplethorpe. Lisa Lyon, 1982
30 Joel-Peter Witkin. Un Santo Oscuro, 1987
31 Sebastiao Salgado. Kuwait, 1991
|
|
|
see
also:
Salgano Sebastiao
Chapter 31
|
1991
|
Sebastiao Salgado
|
|
Kuwait
|
Apocalypse in Oil
|
Saddam Hussein's
troops have been vanquished, but Kuwait is in flames: the Iraqis have set
approximately 900 oil wells on fire. Now international specialists are
trying to extinguish the fire. Sebastiao Salgado observed them - labor
heroes in an age of automation.
|
|
Like every well-made play, this
drama too has three acts, and we find ourselves at the beginning of the
third. It is April 1991, and no one knows how the act will end. The man
who staged it left the ending open - with an option for a Gotterdammerung.
Dictators seem to like binding their personal finale together with a
universal apocalypse. Saddam Hussein remains, as before, in power.
Somewhere beneath Baghdad, he's holed up in a bunker built by German or
British or American specialists. And this is not the only cynical aspect
of a conflict that will go down in the annals of the 1990s as the Gulf
War, and that will cost an estimated hundred to hundred and fifty thousand
lives before it's over. Much of Iraq has been destroyed. The newest
technical weapons - cluster bombs, smart bombs, and cruise missiles - have
thrown the biblical cradle of Middle Eastern culture back to medieval
conditions. But beyond this, the war has changed little, if we take
Saddam's attack on Kuwait on 2 August 1990 as its starting point. It has
certainly brought about no changes in the map, nor in the tendency of
human beings to turn to violence in settling disputes, nor even in the
balance of power in the region. Saddam has been weakened, but he's not yet
been banished to oblivion, as America's president George Bush would gladly
see, without knowing precisely whom he would set up in Saddam's place. And
the Kuwaiti rulers are also back on their old thrones as if nothing had
happened. Apart from which, the balance stands at 138 dead and 66 listed
missing on the side of the Allied forces - along with a series of new
experiences. For example: in the psychology of conducting a war. Or in the
way the military deals with the media. Or in the question how one gets the
upper hand over almost 1,ooo burning oil wells.
On 28 February, after exactly 210
days of combat, the Gulf War comes to an end - at least the military part
of the drama. Saddam's troops have more or less withdrawn from Kuwait, but
not before fulfilling the threat the Iraqi dictator had made from the
beginning, namely, "to set the whole region, including the oil fields, on
fire." Before the war, Kuwait had the world's highest average income; its
oil reserves, the third-largest in the world, overflowed, creating
prosperity for the approximately one million Kuwaitis. Now the liquid gold
was in flames: the advancing Allied troops were greeted by a single vast
inferno. The German news magazine Der Spiegel was moved to comparison with
the Bible to describe the extent of the catastrophe: the destruction of
Sodom and Gomorra, so it seemed, could now be assigned a date, namely
March-April 1991. Everything was on fire. At least nine hundred of the
once wealth-producing oil wells - pessimists spoke of up to a thousand
torches in the desert sands -were burning up to a height of nearly a
thousand feet. A cloud of soot and smoke darkened the heavens, causing a
decline in temperatures throughout the Gulf region. In Kashmir, nearly
1,700 miles away, black snow was falling; in the deserts and savannas of
East Africa, dirty rain. A natural catastrophe of unimagined dimensions
seemed to be approaching. Scientists prognosticated abnormal weather
patterns and questioned whether India would still receive its critical
monsoon rains. If not, the result would be hundreds of thousands of deaths
by famine on the sub-continent. Health risks were discussed, including
possible delayed reactions after people had breathed in the poisonous soot
particles. By the middle of the year, according to the estimates, forty
million tons of raw oil had been burned, releasing two hundred and fifty
thousand tons of nitrous oxide into the atmosphere, along with thirty
millions tons of car-bon dioxide. And no end of the catastrophe was in
sight. Asked by the German magazine Stern in early 1991 whether all of the
Kuwaiti oil fires could be extinguished within a half year, the American
fire expert Paul Neal Adair, nicknamed 'Red,' had a simple answer:
"Nonsense." Cautious estimates reckoned two to three years would be
needed. Even more skeptical was Ali Qabudi of the Kuwait Oil Company at
the end of March, who spoke of a worst-case scenario of ten years before
all the fires were extinguished.
|
Sebastiao Salgado
Kuwait
1991
|

|
|
Additional problems in
extinguishing the fires
|
|
What made the situation so
difficult was not merely the number of fires. The area had been studded
with mines, which greatly restricted the mobility of the fire-fighting
troops who had been sent to the region. Further-more, the oil flowed from
the Kuwaiti wells under natural pressure. The force which had once made it
easy to obtain the raw material now caused additional problems in
extinguishing the fires. In addition, there was the problem of the
proximity of the burning wells to each other: some were less than a mile
apart. This concentration increased the temperatures to infernal levels,
causing the desert sand to melt to glass. Red Adair joked that they had
not even brought a thermometer along with them, because if they knew how
hot it really was, no one would stay there to work. Texas-born Red Adair
is already a legend among fire-fighters, "the most famous fireman in the
world" (Stern). His specialty is blowing out burning shafts with a
carefully placed load of dynamite, but Kuwait seems to be more than even
an expert can handle. In the end, other teams from the USA and Canada,
Romania, Italy, France, China, Hungary, Iran, and Russia also arrive to
help solve the problem - attracted naturally by the impressive rewards
that are being offered. And they try everything - every conceivable idea
or plan - for time is money. Three million barrels - that is, ten per cent
of the world's daily oil consumption - is going up in flames every day;
which in turn means a forty-three billion dollar loss in two years for the
Kuwait oil industry. "Big job, big money," as Red Adair succinctly phrases
it. In other words: no matter how much it costs, the work of his team will
not be too expensive for the country. After all, as heand his co-workers
realize - and only for this reason are they willing to face these hellish
temperatures - every one of them will return home a millionaire. That is,
those who return home at all - for, as the Spiegel emphasizes, "the work
is fraught with mortal danger."
|
Sebastiao Salgado
Firefighters at
Work
Sabotages Oil Wells in Kuwait
1991
|

|
|
An inferno of oil and mud, heat
and gas
|
|
A man is taking a break. Possibly
waiting for supplies. As reported by the western media, there's not enough
of anything here. Not enough water for extinguishing and cooling -
instead, it must be pumped for miles through pipelines from the sea. Not
enough specialized equipment and machines, nor welding gear and bore
heads. Red Adair speaks of a Mickey Mouse job, a remark which sounds like
a bad joke. But he doesn't mean it comically. The issue is survival: for
the firefighters on the job, for the country, for the region. There's
nothing funny about it. And if we think we see something like a smile on
the face of the man in the picture, then it arises more likely from
complete exhaustion than from any sort of amusement. The worker is clearly
at the end of his strength. Kaput. Dreaming of nothing as he stares into
space - minutes of regeneration amid an inferno of oil and mud, heat and
gas, soot and stench. He is covered from head to toe in slippery oil.
Anyone who has worked on an automobile will wonder how he will ever get
himself clean again. But it's even worse, for he stands under this shower
of oil every day. The observer's response to such a filthy layer of oil
might be disgust. But here the opposite is the case. What we are looking
at is an anonymous labor hero - no ordinary human being, but an icon: not
a mere 'hand', but a monument, cast in bronze for eternity. With the
passion of an adherent of liberation theology Sebastiao Salgado is a
specialist in icons. Whatever he photographs becomes a formula for pathos.
His pictures - always in black-and-white -are well-composed, suggestive,
direct, and believable in their depiction of the world's misery. Salgado
is a master at making the frightening into something beautiful, and as a
result is certainly the most admired international photographer today. In
terms of his influence on present-day photojournalism - his function as a
role model - one can designate him justly as the most important camera
artist of the times - a kind of Cartier-Bresson of the late twentieth
century. But whereas Cartier approached his work with the knife-sharp
calculation of the Constructivists, Salgado pursues the emotions. Compared
to what one finds in the sensational press, his pictures do not look
spectacular; rather, their effect lies in the manner in which they lift up
an event. Every one of his photographs thus becomes something special:
"Their pathos," says the Zeit author Peter Sager, "their elegiac gesture
derives from the subject itself, but also from the way it is presented.
Mother-and-child groups, scenes of passion, masses of people caught up in
a great movement - such pictures narrate biblical stories, and Salgado
quotes them with the passion of a Marxist-oriented adherent of liberation
theology." Salgado sees himself as a documentary photographer, and he can
celebrate his success not only in the illustrated press throughout the
world,
but also in the realm of galleries
and museums - a rather unique and much admired triumph in the world of
photography. It is sometimes said that he aestheticizes suffering, that he
exploits the misery of others for the sake of his art. But one thing is
certain. There are few who have gotten as close as he, and with such an
alert and interested eye, to misery. Salgado, as the writer Marcio Souza
points out, has brought a completely new element to photography, one which
is perhaps traceable to his Brazilian origins: namely, the complete
absence of a bad con-science in relation to poverty, suffering, and social
injustice. This does not mean, however, that Salgado feels no sympathy for
what he sees. What distinguishes him from others is his attitude toward
those he photo-graphs. As oil engineer Dave Wilson puts it: "It's kind of
an aggressive act to take someone's picture. Somehow or other, he melts
all that away." Salgado was born in 1944 in southwestern Brazil, the only
boy in a family of eight children. He studied in Sao Paulo and Paris, and
seemed to be headed for a career with the World Bank. But then, almost
overnight, he changed his mind. Inspired by the engagement of
photographers such as Lewis Hine and Dorothea Lange, Salgado took up the
camera and set out for Africa to document the famine in the desert regions
of the Sahel. That Salgado was the photographer who caught the attempted
assassination of Reagan in 1981 seems today to be almost a mistake, for
Salgado -the global player with a touch of Marx - is primarily interested
in the Third World. At the core of his engagement stand the peoples of
Latin America, Asia, and Africa, or the International Union of Manual
Workers, about whom he has been working on a major cycle since 1980,
calling his project on the dignity of labor simply Workers. According to
Salgado, he is not necessarily directing criticism at a certain
development, but rather trying to "portray the disappearance of the
community of laborers." This is not his first excursion into the Near
East. At the end of the 1980s, he had accompanied a troop of Iraqi
military actors at the front during the war between Iraq and Iran. Western
media had actually been denied access to the war, but on occasion a
Brazilian passport can have its advantages.
|

|
Sebastiao Salgado
Kuwait
1991
|
|
On average twelve rolls of film
per day
|

Sebastiao Salgado
Workers
New York, 1993
|
Here, in the midst of the burning
oil fields, Salgado is of course not the only reporter. Stephane Compoint
is present, and will eventually receive a photography prize for his work.
Also the Magnum photographer Bruno Barbey is on the scene, as well as the
photographers Steve McCurry (National Geographic) and Peter Menzel
(Stern). What distinguishes Sal-ado from the others, though, is that he
photographs in black-and-white. Equipped with three Leicas and 28 mm, 35
mm, and 60 mm lenses, he shoots on average twelve rolls per day. In
Kuwait, he made approximately seven thousand exposures, from which six per
roll are processed as work prints. On average he presents fifty
photographs to magazines, who then make their selections. Salgado's report
with the working title "Oil Wells" appeared for the first time in the New
York Times Magazine on 9 June 1991 under the title "The Eye of the
Photojournalist." The Spiegel published several samples of his work in
issue 24 of the same year (10 June). In the World Press Contest, Salgado's
work secured him the Oskar Barnack Prize. And the Kuwait cycle is also
represented in his thematically-oriented book Workers (1993): our picture
occurs as a full-page print on page 340.
At the beginning of November 1991,
against all expectations, the last fire in Kuwait was extinguished. Red
Adair and his workers, the gang from Boots &. Coots, Wild Well Control,
and Safety Boss have returned to their various homes. In the meantime, the
catastrophe has become history, and as such, is (almost) forgotten. What
still remains are the photographs by Sebastiao Salgado: icons that
transcend time, made not for the daily press, but for the collective
pictorial memory. Salgado's pictures are a visualized Bible which extol
the core of all that we find human. This is why his pictures are
understood - and treasured - around the world.
|
|
|
Sebastiao Salgado
Sebastiao Salgado (born February 8, 1944 in Aimorés,
Minas Gerais, Brazil) is a Brazilian documentary photographer and
photojournalist.
After a somewhat itinerant childhood, Salgado initially trained as an
economist, earning a master’s degree in economics from the University of
Sao Paulo in Brazil. He began work as an economist for the International
Coffee Organization, often traveling to Africa on missions for the World
Bank, when he first started seriously taking photographs. He chose to
abandon a career as an economist and switched to photography in 1973,
working initially on news assignments before veering more towards
documentary-type work. Salgado initially worked with the Paris based
agency Gamma, but in 1979 he joined the international cooperative of
photographers Magnum Photos. He left Magnum in 1994 and formed his own
agency, Amazonas Images, in Paris to represent his work. He is
particularly noted for his documentary photography of workers in less
developed nations. Longtime gallery director Hal Gould considers Salgado
to be the most important photographer of the early 21st century, and gave
him his first show in the United States.
Salgado works on long term, self assigned projects many of which have been
published as books: The Other Americas, Sahel, Workers, and Migrations.
The latter two are mammoth collections with hundreds of images each from
all around the world. His most famous pictures are of a gold mine in
Brazil called Serra Pelada. He is presently working on a project called
Genesis photographing the landscape, flora and fauna of places on earth
that have not been taken over by man.
Most recently, Salgado has displayed in September and October 2007 his
pictures of Coffee workers from India, Guatemala, Ethiopia and Brazil at
the Brazilian Embassy in London. The aim of the project was to raise
public awareness of the origins of the popular drink.
|
|
|

San Juan,
Chimborazo
Ecuador, 1979
|
|

A community above Chimborazo
Ecuador, 1982
|
|

Day of the Dead in San Vicente Nautec
Ecuador, 1982
|
|

Wearing sheepskin to protect from cold and humidity
Ecuador, 1982
|
|

Refugees in the Korem camp
Ethiopia, 1984
|
|

Children's ward in the Korem refugee camp
Ethiopia, 1984
|
|

Refugee from Gondan
Mali, 1985
|
|

Gourma-Rharous
Mali, 1985
|
|

Transporting bags of dirt in the Serra Pelada gold mine
Brazil, 1986
|
|

Dispute between Serra Pelada gold mine workers and military police
Brazil, 1986
|
|

Going up the Serra Pelada mine
Brazil, 1986
|
|

Full view of the Serra Pelada gold mine
Brazil, 1986
|

|
|
|