|
|

|
|
History of Photography
Introduction
History of Photography
A World History of Photography
The Story Behind the Pictures 1827-1991
Photographers' Dictionary


|
|
THE STORY BEHIND THE PICTURES 1827-1991
|
|
1 Nicephore Niepce. View from the Study Window, 1827
2 Louis-Jacques-Mande Daguerre. Boulevard du Temple, 1838
3 Eugene Durieu/Eugene Delacroix. Nude from Behind, ca. 1853
4 Duchenne de Boulogne. Contractions musculaires, 1856
5 Auguste Rosalie Bisson. The Ascent of Mont Blanc, 1862
6 Nadar. Sarah Bernhardt, ca. 1864
7 Francois Aubert. Emperor Maximilian's Shirt, 1867
8 Andre Adolphe Eugene Disderi. Dead Communards, 1871
9 Maurice Guibert. Toulouse-Lautrec in His Studio, ca. 1894
10 Max Priester/Willy Wilcke. Bismarck on his Deathbed, 1898
11 Heinrich Zille. The Wood Gatherers, 1898
12 Alfred Stieglitz. The Steerage, 1907
13 Lewis Hine. Girl Worker in a Carolina Cotton Mill, 1908
14 August Sander. Young Farmers, 1914
15 Paul Strand. Blind Woman, 1916
16 Man Ray. Noire et blanche, 1926
17 Andre Kertesz. Meudon, 1928
18 Robert Capa. Spanish Loyalist, 1936
19 Dorothea Lange. Migrant Mother,
Nipomo, California, 1936
20 Horst P. Horst. Mainbocher Corset, 1939
21 Henri Cartier-Bresson. Germany, 1945
22 Richard Petersen. View from the Dresden City Hall Tower, 1945
23 Robert Doisneau. The Kiss in Front of City Hall, 1950
24 Dennis Stock. James Dean on Times Square, 1955
25 Bert Stern. Marilyn's Last Sitting, 1962
26 Gerard Malanga. Andy Warhol and The Velvet Underground, 1966
27 Helmut Newton. They're Coming!,
1981
28 Sandy Skoglund. Revenge of the Goldfish, 1981
29 Robert Mapplethorpe. Lisa Lyon, 1982
30 Joel-Peter Witkin. Un Santo Oscuro, 1987
31 Sebastiao Salgado. Kuwait, 1991
|
|
|
see also:
WITKIN
JOEL-PETER
Chapter 30 (part I)
|
1987
|
Joel-Peter Witkin
|
|
Un Santo Oscuro
|
A Martyr of Life
|
Some see his bizarre
allegories as the quintessence of western decadence and moral decline;
others compare him to Goya or call him the Hieronymous Bosch of
photography. No other photographer of our age has polarized both art
critics and the general public more than the American artist Joel-Peter
Witkin.
|
|
Taken unaware, the unprepared gaze
finds itself looking at what seems quite unbelievable. What are we looking
at? A man? A human figure? Or simply a masquerade? A nightmare from
another age, or perhaps an image created by contemporary Postmodernism?
The uncertainties are multi-layered, resulting in alienation coupled with
curiosity and a vague sense of horror.
As a rule, we are able to assign a
photographic image spontaneously and confidently to a certain time frame
or epoch - the nineteenth or early twentieth century, the 1950s, or a more
recent date. This picture, how-ever, seems to want to withdraw grotesquely
from all temporal parameters. On the one hand, the observer has the
impression that the image stems from a strange, sinister world, which has
somehow left its traces on the photograph as it journeyed to the present:
spots, scratches, a leap', such as one identifies with the age of the
glass negative. On the other hand, the prosthesis, at least, points to the
late twentieth century. Ergo, a digitally created horror vision, using the
most modern technology to present a stifling variation of St. Sebastian,
pierced with arrows - an image which has been a part of Christian art
since the Renaissance and Baroque?
|

|
Joel-Peter Witkin
Un Santo Oscuro
1987
|
|
Incredible even to more
tolerant contemporaries
|
|
To set matters straight right from
the start: the American photographer Joel-Peter Witkin does not work with
a computer, but with traditional photographic means. A twin-lens
Rolleifiex vintage 1960 remains his camera of choice; he uses conventional
roll film, and rarely shoots more than two frames per motif. And nor does
he make collages or montages. The sole way in which he distances himself
from the normal photography that takes 'straight' shots of its subjects is
the way he works the negative -but more on that later. And, of course, by
the way he creates scenes, a process in which he does not simply take the
world as seen through the viewer, but creates rather a universe according
to his pre-formulated ideas, visions, and fantasies - a cosmos rich with
allusion, references, quotations - whose 'inhabitants' Witkin discovers in
those places from which the proponents of more conventional ideals of
beauty normally shy. And what is he interested in? Witkin unashamedly
calls a spade a spade, and lists: freaks of every kind, idiots, dwarves,
giants, deformations, pre-op trans-sexuals ... All the people who were
born without arms, legs, eyes, breasts, genitals, ears, noses, lips. All
those with unusually large genitals, dominas and slaves...Recently, Witkin
has added dismembered bits of corpses to his list, which he arranges in
the manner of seventeenth-century Flemish still lifes - an approach which
must seem incredible even to his more tolerant contemporaries - and which
especially in the USA has repeatedly stirred up the ire of district
attorneys and self-appointed cultural censors. Without a doubt, Joel-Peter
Witkin is one of the most controversial artists of his time. But where
fundamentalist preachers stamp him as a monster in front of millions of TV
viewers, the art world has come to recognize him as one of the most
original and pro-found of contemporary artists. Accordingly, the prices of
his limited editions, rarely consisting of more than a dozen prints, are
the highest that Postmodern photography commands.
|
Joel-Peter Witkin: sketch for Un Santo Oscuro
|

|
|
The extraordinary as part of
everyday life
|
|
Anyone who looks will find that
Witkin's biography gives more than enough evidence for what at first
glance seems to be a morbid obsession, but which is in fact nothing more
than an attempt to examine the basis of earthly existence, to take issue
with categories of norms and deviations, to transgress boundaries with
open eyes, in order to discover pictorially what Witkin likes to term the
'divine'. As a child, equipped with a used Rolleicord, he once tried to
photograph God: someone had told him of a rabbi who had seen God. Witkin
visited the rabbi, but God remained invisible. Where was Cod to be found,
he asked himself. In people, as the Christian message teaches? And if so,
then in which people? Might it not be that God reveals himself in a
special way precisely thorough those beings who are clearly different from
the majority bodily or mentally? It is, in fact, philosophical-religious
reflections like these which lie at the core of Joel-Peter Witkin's ceuvre.
Witkin was born in Brooklyn in 1939 as the son of poor immigrants. His
father was an Orthodox Russian Jew, his mother an Italian with strong
Catholic beliefs - differences that were to become the primary reason for
the couple's separation. Joel-Peter and his twin brothers were raised by
his mother and his grandmother. "My grandmother had only one leg," Witkin
recalls, "and in the morning I would wake up and smell her gangrenous leg.
Where most kids would wake up and smell coffee, I would wake up and smell
grandmother's rotting leg." Witkin thus became early acquainted with the
strange, and the extraordinary became a natural part of everyday life. He
learned to accept illness and suffering in life, of which death was also
necessarily a part, even if the thought is often suppressed. "My first
conscious recollection occurred when I was 6 years old. It happened on a
Sunday when my mother was escorting my twin brother and me down the steps
of the tenement where we lived. We were going to church. While walking
through the hallway to the entrance of the building, we heard an
incredible crash mixed with screaming and cries for help. The accident had
involved three cars, all with families in them. Somehow, in the confusion,
I was no longer holding my mother's hand. At the place where I stood at
the curb, I could see something rolling from one of the overturned cars.
It stopped at the curb where I stood. It was the head of a little girl. I
bent down to touch the face, to ask it - but before I could touch it -
someone carried me away."
|
Joel-Peter Witkin
Leda, Los Angeles
1986
|

|
|
His own world of personal
fantasies
|
|
Already at age sixteen, Joel-Peter
Witkin began taking a serious interest in photography. At the Museum of
Modern Art, he introduced himself to Edward Steichen, who in fact accepted
one of his pictures into the permanent exhibit. This experience motivated
him to become a photographer. Witkin made a trek to Coney Island, where a
freak show particularly caught his interest. He photographed the
three-legged man, the 'Chicken Lady', and the hermaphrodite, with whom he
claimed he had his first sexual experience. The freak show became his
"home", the true environment where his lively fantasies could play
themselves out. Unfortunately, they didn't need a photographer, and nor
was he a freak, for otherwise Witkin would have gone on the road with
them. So he remained in New York and worked in commercial studios, while
at home he began to create my own world of personal fantasies that he
could photograph. Witkin was drafted into the army in 1961, where he
documented accidents that occurred on maneuver - and the fatalities they
sometimes resulted in. He volunteered for Vietnam, attempted suicide, and
was released from the army. He then took up studies at the Cooper Union
School in New York, switching later to the University of New Mexico, where
he graduated in 1981 with a Master of Fine Arts degree. By 1980, with his
first one-man show curated by Sam Wagstaff in New York, Witkin became the
object of passionate and controversial discussion.
|
Joel-Peter Witkin
Poet: from a collection of relics and ornaments, Berlin, 1986
|

|
|
Christian taboos of Eros and
the body
|
|
"Witkin's philosophical/spiritual
beliefs," according to Hai Fisher, "are exceptionally complex, a not
particularly decipherable synthesis of Jewish cabalistic thought, Roman
Catholic practice, Eastern philosophy and 1960s counterculture
consciousness." Last but not least, Witkin's work can be read as an
artistic revolt against both traditional Jewish iconoclasm and the
Christian taboos of Eros and the body. Witkin mistrusts established norms
and places them consciously in question. He even uses his own medium
'against the grain': for Witkin, recognition and understanding do not grow
out of the mere duplication of reality, but only from the creation of an
artificial world at whose center hermaphrodites, dwarves, cripples,
Siamese twins, and amputees function as the catalysts of an expanded
spiritual horizon. Probably the most common protest against Witkin's
photography is that he misuses the handicapped to create a macabre
spectacle. Jackie Tellafian, New York theatrical agent and lead actress in
Witkin's Woman in the Blue Hat (1985), who is herself con¬fined to a
wheelchair, reacted to these charges saying: "I've had many people say:
'Didn't you feel exploited by that?' and I always said no, because first
of all he never made me feel as though he was using my disability as a
sensational aspect in the picture."
Others have also reacted in a
similar manner, openly speaking of the humane manner in which Witkin
treats them, how he makes them into the subject of his art, and thereby
open to public view with full dignity, in contrast to the society which
had hidden them away and pushed them aside. And in fact, in Witkin's
photographic creations, deficiencies acquire a metaphysical power. "The
formless and misshapen, the lowly and that which causes shudders are
brought back into the light" (Germano Celant).
Created in 1987, Un Santo Oscuro
exemplifies Witkin's artistic approach. As so often, also in this case, it
was a person with a physical handicap who inspired the photograph. Friends
had told him about a man in a wheelchair who lacked a face and arms. On
the spur of the moment, Wit-kin made a first draft - a scribble or sketch
- of an idea. But where in Los Angeles could he possibly find the man?
"With my friend," Wirkin recalls, "we went down to the area where we
thought he lived. There was an old run-down hotel, and when we got inside
we finally saw him, because the door was open on the room he lived in. He
was asleep. What we saw was this kind of plastic head, this little body,
and we didn't want to disturb him. It was our conviction that we had to
wait for other people to arrive, and sure enough they did. Two men
actually arrived to take care of him. We got into the room and talked. We
found out from our conversation that this man was a Thalidomide victim. He
was Canadian. His mother took Thalidomide, and he was born without skin,
without arms or legs, without hair, eyelashes or eyelids. Early on, from
the time he was a child, he was the subject of ridicule and curiosity and
wanted by side-shows and freak-shows. I talked about how I wanted to
photograph him. I wanted to photograph him as clerics would have been
depicted, mostly in seventeenth and eighteenth-century Spain, as martyrs,
and I told this man that he was a martyr to life."
|
Joel-Peter Witkin
Courbet in Rejiander's Pool 1985
|

|
|
A popular subject for religious
painting commissions
|
|
Joel-Peter Witkin's photographs
are the result of elaborate staging in the studio, during which an
interior image, a vision, finds its outward expression. Often works of the
great masters - Velasquez, Cimabue, Giotto, Rembrandt, Arcimboldo,
Picasso, Goya, Delacroix - stand at the start of Witkin's artistic
creations. Without hesitation, he reaches back to myths, fairy tales, the
traditions of western art history, all of which he seems to know well. The
titles of works like Sander's Wife, Courbet in Rejiander's Pool, or
Von Gioeden in Asia make the sources of his inspiration clear. In addition to
painting and graphics, the photography of Ernest James Bellocq, Eadweard
J. Muybridge, and Charles Negre also provided stimulation. Un Santo Oscuro,
however, does not draw from a particular individual picture, but rather
from a pictorial genre that was a popular subject for religious painting
commissions, in particular during the Spanish Baroque. Priests appeared in
the pose of honored saints in order to increase their own power by
association, their social position, and their clerical aura. What remained
a mere travesty, however, in the historical panel painting, Witkin creates
from real earthly torture. "Instead of a voluntary, playful masochism,
Witkin cites real pain" (Chris Townsend).
|
Joel-Peter Witkin
Studio of the painter-Courbet
|

|
|
The darkroom becomes a kind of
holy house
|
|
Witkin may arrange his scenes, but
he does not manipulate his pictures. The photographs are called into being
without any technical tricks; they are therefore 'straight'. All the
elements of the given scene are components of an often slowly and
painstakingly arranged ensemble. Only later is the negative reworked to
acquire the patina that gives Witkin's pictures the aura of being
withdrawn from time. In the author's own description, he becomes a kind of
priest of aesthetics. "I work alone during printing and begin by
communicating with my equipment and chemistry, thanking them in advance. I
place a negative in the enlarger and the darkroom becomes a kind of holy
house, a refuge for phenomena..." By changing the texture of the picture,
Witkin effectively moves it in time and space. As if through a hidden
crack, we catch a glimpse into a strange cabinet. Witkin's pictures, as
the writer Ludwig Fels states, are "Witnesses of a profound spirituality
that creates from archaic sources." Witkin's art takes up the basic
categories of human existence: love and pain, joy and suffering, Eros and
Thanatos. He is the philosopher among the photographers of our ase.
|
|
|
Joel-Peter Witkin
Joel-Peter Witkin (born September 13, 1939, in Brooklyn, New York City)
is an American photographer.
Witkin was born to a Jewish father and Roman Catholic mother. He has a
twin brother, Jerome Witkin, who also plays a significant role in the art
world for his realistic paintings. Witkin's parents divorced when Witkin
was young because they were unable to transcend their religious
differences. He attended grammar school at Saint Cecelia's in Brooklyn and
went on to Grover Cleveland High School. He worked as war photographer
between 1961 and 1964 during the Vietnam war. In 1967, he decided to work
as a freelance photographer and became City Walls Inc. official
photographer. Later, he attended Cooper Union in New York where he studied
sculpture and became Bachelor of Arts in 1974. After the Columbia
University granted him a scholarship, he ended his studies at the
University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, where he became Master of Fine
Arts.
Witkin claims that his vision and sensibility were initiated by an episode
he witnessed when he was just a small child, a car accident that occurred
in front of his house in which a little girl was decapitated.
"It happened on a Sunday when my mother was escorting my twin brother and
me down the steps of the tenement where we lived. We were going to church.
While walking down the hallway to the entrance of the building, we heard
an incredible crash mixed with screaming and cries for help. The accident
involved three cars, all with families in them. Somehow, in the confusion,
I was no longer holding my mother's hand. At the place where I stood at
the curb, I could see something rolling from one of the overturned cars.
It stopped at the curb where I stood. It was the head of a little girl. I
bent down to touch the face, to speak to it -- but before I could touch it
someone carried me away."
He also claims that the difficulties in his family were an influence
for his work too. His favourite artist is Giotto, but the most obvious
artistic influences on his work are Surrealism (particularly Max Ernst)
and Baroque art. His photographic techniques draw on early Daguerreotypes
and on the work of E. J. Bellocq.
His work often deals with such themes as death, corpses (or pieces of
them), and various outsiders such as dwarfs, transsexuals, hermaphrodites,
and physically deformed people. His complex tableaux often recall
religious episodes or famous classical paintings. Because of the
transgressive nature of the contents of his pictures, his works have been
labeled exploitative and have sometimes shocked public opinion. His art
was often marginalized because of this challenging aspect.
He employs a highly intuitive approach to the physical process of making
the photograph, including scratching the negative, bleaching or toning the
print, and an actual hands-in-the-chemicals printing technique. This
experimentation began after seeing a 19th-century ambrotype of a woman and
her ex-lover who had been scratched from the frame.
|
|
|
|

|
|