|
|

|
|
History of Photography
Introduction
History of Photography
A World History of Photography
The Story Behind the Pictures 1827-1991
Photographers' Dictionary


|
|
THE STORY BEHIND THE PICTURES 1827-1991
|
|
1 Nicephore Niepce. View from the Study Window, 1827
2 Louis-Jacques-Mande Daguerre. Boulevard du Temple, 1838
3 Eugene Durieu/Eugene Delacroix. Nude from Behind, ca. 1853
4 Duchenne de Boulogne. Contractions musculaires, 1856
5 Auguste Rosalie Bisson. The Ascent of Mont Blanc, 1862
6 Nadar. Sarah Bernhardt, ca. 1864
7 Francois Aubert. Emperor Maximilian's Shirt, 1867
8 Andre Adolphe Eugene Disderi. Dead Communards, 1871
9 Maurice Guibert. Toulouse-Lautrec in His Studio, ca. 1894
10 Max Priester/Willy Wilcke. Bismarck on his Deathbed, 1898
11 Heinrich Zille. The Wood Gatherers, 1898
12 Alfred Stieglitz. The Steerage, 1907
13 Lewis Hine. Girl Worker in a Carolina Cotton Mill, 1908
14 August Sander. Young Farmers, 1914
15 Paul Strand. Blind Woman, 1916
16 Man Ray. Noire et blanche, 1926
17 Andre Kertesz. Meudon, 1928
18 Robert Capa. Spanish Loyalist, 1936
19 Dorothea Lange. Migrant Mother,
Nipomo, California, 1936
20 Horst P. Horst. Mainbocher Corset, 1939
21 Henri Cartier-Bresson. Germany, 1945
22 Richard Petersen. View from the Dresden City Hall Tower, 1945
23 Robert Doisneau. The Kiss in Front of City Hall, 1950
24 Dennis Stock. James Dean on Times Square, 1955
25 Bert Stern. Marilyn's Last Sitting, 1962
26 Gerard Malanga. Andy Warhol and The Velvet Underground, 1966
27 Helmut Newton. They're Coming!,
1981
28 Sandy Skoglund. Revenge of the Goldfish, 1981
29 Robert Mapplethorpe. Lisa Lyon, 1982
30 Joel-Peter Witkin. Un Santo Oscuro, 1987
31 Sebastiao Salgado. Kuwait, 1991
|
|
|
see also:
CAPA
ROBERT
Chapter 18
|
1936
|
Robert Capa
|
|
Spanish Loyalist
|
Cordoba Before
the Fall
|
Robert Capa was more
than a war photographer, even if it was his war scenes that made him
famous. In the end, his estate comprised more that 70,000 negatives - but
that of his most famous picture is accounted lost.
|
|
Finally, he has acquired a name.
For decades, he was merely an unknown soldier, a nameless victim of war.
He, or rather his picture, stood symbolically for the millions of deaths
lost to war and violence. The caption affixed to the image was as brief as
it was general: Loyalist Soldierwas the most usual title. Or Falling
Soldier, or even Loyalist Militia - but this reference to the
Anarcho-Syndicalists who fought on the Republican side of the war
attempted a more exact identification than the picture really allowed. For
as many critics have rightly noted, this photograph drew, and still draws,
its power precisely from its generalization of death. Only insofar as the
photograph stands for a reality that passes beyond time can it function as
an icon of dying in a higher sense. As late as 1984, the writer Peter
Hartling, in his lectures on poetics given in Frankfurt-am-Main, addressed
the issue of the "absence of data on the Soldier" and asked whether it was
proper to create something like an identity for him. Ac-cording to
Hartling, "He cannot have been a soldier after the model of a Malraux or
Hemingway, but rather one of those who were buried - nameless among
thousands of nameless - in the Cemeteries of the Moon, as Georges Bernanos
described them in helpless protest." Hartling answered his own question:
"No, I would not give him a name." But now we know the facts: the name of
the soldier is Federico Borrell Garcia. He was twenty-four years young,
came from Alcoy in southern Spain, and died on 5 September 1936 on the
Cordoba front near Cerro Muriano.
|

|
Robert Capa
(1913-1954)
Loyalist Militiaman at
the Moment of Death, 1936
|
|
The most exciting shot of
battle action
|
|
The soldier's death is documented
in the files of the military archives of Salamanca, to which we will
return later. The photographer Robert Capa, then aged twenty-two, captured
the instant of the soldier's death - and at the same time created what is
probably his most famous photo. There is no information about the picture;
not even Magnum, the agency co-founded by Capa and which still holds the
rights to the picture under entry number CAR 36004 W000X1/ICP 154, has
data about its circulation and reception. Nonetheless, historians and
biographers agree on the unique status of this picture. To cite just a few
voices: the Capa scholar Richard Whelan speaks of "the most exciting and
immediate shot of battle action" ever taken; Russell Miller in his recent
book on Magnum declares it to be "the greatest war photograph ever taken";
the German illustrated Stern (41/1996) termed the photograph "a symbol of
the Spanish Civil War and later the ultimate image for the anti-war
movement"; and finally, Rainer Fabian, in his article on more than 130
years of war photography, speaks of "the most legendary and most-published
war picture in history." According to Fabian, "War photography is the use
that one makes of it"; that is, a war picture defines itself primarily
through the way it is used. Robert Capa's photograph of the Spanish
Loyalist was not the first picture to emerge from a war, but is stands as
"the first compelling action shot taken during wartime" (Carol Squiers).
One tends to treat such superlatives with skepticism; after all, many
photographs and films also emerged from the First World War, at a time
when Capa's pre-ferred working camera, the Leica, was not yet on the
market. In those days, photojournalists had comparatively large and clumsy
cameras, weak lenses, and glass negatives that debarred quick reactions or
sequences. Notwithstanding, one cannot exclude the possibility that among
the many thousands of photographs taken, there might be a picture of a
death that is at least the equal of Capa's. What had certainly changed
since the end of the First World War, however, was the situation of the
media. War pictures were now treated differently, as photographs found a
forum in the newly created illustrated press. As a result, there was now a
demand and, in many lands, a largely uncensored public sphere. In short, a
change in paradigms had taken place.
|
|

Double-page spread from Life: advertising and editorial in absurd, almost
cynical competition with each other
|
|

Double-page spread from La Revue du Medecin, 30 September 1936:
the first issue of the magazine for doctors and pharmacists published
Capa's pictures .
|
|
The blossoming new genre of
illustrated magazines
|
|
The specific character of the
Spanish Civil War must also be kept in mind. For most Europeans, it was a
distant civil war which one nonetheless regarded with curiosity because
here - quasi symbolically for the rest of
the world - the struggle between
the Left and the Right, between Communism and Fascism, was being fought
out. In other words, in this age before television there was a strong and
international interest in pictures that the new genre of illustrated
magazines, which had blossomed into being since the 1920s, knew how to
satisfy. Advances in printing techniques, new forms of distribution, and
revolutionary layout techniques allowed the improved reproduction of
images more quickly and attractively than had been possible earlier, and
supplied them to the readers. In addition, a new generation of
photographers had appeared: equipped with faster cameras and a new
understanding of their role. The field now included photojournalists,
adventurers, and parvenus who personally stood - or were supposed to stand
- for the originality, seriousness, and authenticity of a story. It is not
by chance that reports became more and more personalized. When the English
illustrated Picture Post devoted all of eleven pages to Robert Capa's
civil war photographs in December 1938, the cover clearly proclaimed him
to be the greatest war photogra-pher in the world. This was not the first
publication of pictures from Spain, but it was the start of a myth that is
still effective today. He was young and obviously ambitious, a
photographer with leftist sympathies, a charmer, a ladies' man, gambler,
and adventurer all in one -thus we can imagine Capa in those years. In
addition, he was undoubtedy a "concerned photographer," who above all
believed in himself, his talent, skill, and courage to achieve good
pictures. His real name was Endre Erno Friedman, and he had been born in
Budapest in 1913, the second of a tailor's three children. Even as a boy,
he was alert and knew how to take his life in hand. In 1931 he moved to
Berlin, studied at the Academy for Politics, and earned a bit of money at
the legendary Dephot agency, where he carried coal, handled the laboratory
work, and at some point was also permitted to take a camera into his own
hands. Photographs of the camerashy Leo Trotsky are said to be the
beginning of his career as a photographer. Even here, Capa already
succeeded instinctively and with a good deal of chutzpah in a brilliant
report. "Ifyour pictures are no good," he is reported to have said, "you
didn't get close enough."
|
|

|
|
The first to recognize the
visual power of the photograph
|
|
Hitler's takeover hindered the
further development of Capa's career, at least in Nazi Germany. Like so
many of the photographic guild - Stefan Hungarians - Capa, who was Jewish,
felt forced to emigrate. Only after he moved to Paris did the talented
novice with a sense for themes change his name to Robert Capa - a man
whose work was in fact not at all limited to war photography, even if it
was primarily his war reports that carried him to fame.
These were restless times
politically. Spain was caught up in civil war since July 1936. An alliance
of right-wing generals, large landowners, nobles, and the Catholic Church
had risen up against the elected popular-front government. Political
upheaval was also threatening France, with workers on strike since May to
force the leftist government under Leon Blum to undertake social reform.
Precisely where Capa stood politically is unknown, but a picture published
in the left-oriented illustrated Vu from 3 June 1936 testifies to his
interest in the workers' strike. Similarly, during the Spanish Civil War
we can identify at least a modicum of sympathy for the Left in Capa, who
had been inspired by Karl Korsch and his ideals of a people's front in
Berlin. What in any case is certain is that in early August, Capa and his
long-term companion Gerda Taro set out for Spain to document the
two-week-old conflict from the perspective of the Anarcho-Syndicalists.
Capa photographed in Barcelona and on the Aragon front, then went on to
the Huesca front, until he finally arrived at Cordoba, where he took the
picture that would be his most famous.
The Spanish Loyalist initially
appeared in Vu, No. 447, on 23 September 1936. The picture occupies the
upper left half of a double-page spread entitled "La Guerre Civile en
Espagne." Responsible for the layout was Alex Liberman, later art director
of the American Vogue, who thus was the first to recognize the visual
power of the photograph. Under the picture, Liberman also placed a
variant, thus conveying the rhythm of a film to the sequence of images -
although close observation indicates that there are really two
protagonists depicted here. There is no reference to place, time, or even
the names of the dead. The caption remains general in content, speaking in
pathos-filled tones about the whistle of a bullet and blood being drunk by
the native soil. The next to publish the picture was life, in its issue
from 12 July 1937. Under the heading "Death in Spain," the magazine marked
the first anniversary of the beginning of the war and spoke of the victims
- Life reported half a million lives had been lost. The article opened
with Capa's photograph in large format, although slightly cropped on the
right. Two days later, the Communist magazine Regards, which had already
published several of Capa's reports, also published the photograph. Capa
himself gave it a prominent position on the cover of his book Death in the
Making (New York, 1938), along with other photo-graphs he and Gerda Taro
had taken in Spain. He still, however, absolved himself of the duty to
provide data on the location, time, or circum-stances of the picture.
Soon the photograph began to
provoke questions; doubt as to its authenticity began to make the rounds.
Life commented on the moment in which the solder is struck by a bullet in
the head. But even a close examination of the picture fails to reveal a
bullet wound any¬where on the body. One also might ask oneself how a man
hit by a bullet while he is storming down an incline can fall backwards.
Speculation also arose over the blossom-white uniform, hardly appropriate
for the battle field. Furthermore, it is strange that Capa photographed
the soldier from the front: wouldn't this necessarily imply that he had
rushed ahead of the militiaman? On the other hand, there is just as much
that argues against the thesis that Capa staged the photograph, including
his very professionalism as a photographer. It hardly would have been
necessary for him to have staged such a picture. And that one of the
members of the Confederacion National del Trabajo (CNT) should have
stooped to act out his own death appears equally implausible. Nonetheless,
in the course of several interviews, the British journalist O'Dowd
Gallagher re-ignited the discussion over the credibility of the photograph
in the 1970s when he declared that he had shared a hotel room with Capa
near the French border at the time the photo was made, and that later,
Loyalist soldiers staged useful photos for the press. Elsewhere, however,
Gallagher speaks of Franco's troops in Loyalist uniforms who carried out
the deception. But, as Richard Whelan points out, aside from the
journalist's self-contradictory testimony, Capa as a Jew and a
self-declared anti-fascist would have found it difficult to work together
on a project with the Falangists.
|

|
|
The key picture of a longer
sequence
|
|
Neither can the original negatives
offer further information, for they have disappeared. Capa himself spoke
about the picture only once, in an interview on September 1937. According
to a paraphrase by a journalist for the New York World Telegram, Capa and
the militiaman had both been left behind by the troops: "Capa with his
precious camera and the soldier with his rifle. The soldier was impatient.
He wanted to get back to the Loyalist lines. Time and time again he
climbed up and peered over the sandbags. Each time he would drop back at
the warning rattle of machine-gun fire. Finally the soldier muttered
something to the effect that he was going to take the long chance. He
climbed out of the trench with Capa behind him. The machine-guns rattled,
and Capa automatically snapped his camera, falling back beside the body of
his companion. Two hours later, when it was dark and the guns were still,
the photographer crept across the broken ground to safety. Later he
discovered that he had taken one of the finest action shots of the Spanish
war." Was Capa really alone with the militiaman? His biographer Richard
Whelan expresses doubts on this point. After all, the key picture is one
of a larger sequence in which several pictures clearly depict both of the
soldiers who were later killed - one in the midst of a momentarily
care-free group of CNT militiamen, and another in a leap over a trench.
Furthermore, in the battle our protagonist is clearly recognizable. But
there is something else that is suspicious: the two photographs of a
wounded and a falling soldier published in the Vu issue of 1936 must have
been taken at approximately the same time, judging by the unchanged cloud
formations. The perspective is also identical. Finally, the argument for
the existence of two militiamen is supported by a more exact look at their
clothing. One of the soldiers is wearing a white shirt and trousers; the
other, a kind of worker's overall. On one soldier, the leather suspenders
follow a straight line down to the trousers; the other soldier wears them
crossed. "If one then looks closely at the ground in the Falling Soldier
photograph and in the variant image," argues Richard Whelan in his
biography of Capa, "and compares the configuration of prominently
upstanding stalks, it becomes obvious that the two men are shown falling
on almost precisely the same spot. (The Falling Soldier is about one foot
closer to the photographer than is the man in the other picture.) We may
well then ask why it is that although the two men fell within a short time
of each other...in neither picture do we see the body of the other man on
the ground."
|
|

|
|
The truth is the best picture
|
|
Neither Whelan nor Capa's younger
brother Cornell, who administered the estate left by Capa after he was
killed by a mine in 1954 in Indochina, have ever allowed a doubt to be
raised about their belief in the truth of the documentary photograph.
Furthermore, according to Whelan, it's "a great and powerful image... To
insist upon knowing whether the photograph actually shows a man at the
moment he has been hit by a bullet is both morbid and trivializing, for
the picture's greatness ultimately lies in its symbolic implications, not
in its literal accuracy as a report on the death of a particular man."
Whelan's biography of Capa was published in the USA in 1985. Exactly ten
years later, a certain Mario Brotons Jorda edited and published his
memoirs on the Spanish Civil War under the title Retazos de una epoca de
inquietudes. Brotons had himself fought on the Cordoba front. In Capa's
famous photograph he recognized the leather bullet pouches that were made
in exactly that fashion only in Alcoy, and that only the militiamen from
Alcoy carried. Based on various indications in Capa's photograph, Whelan
had dated it to 5 September and deduced that the location was somewhere
around Cerro Muriano. And in fact, as Brotons was able to find out in the
State Archive in Salamanca, there was only a single militiaman from the
Alcoy region who was killed on 5 September 1936 on the Cordoba front near
Cerro Muriano: Federico Borrell Garcia. When Brotons then showed Capa's
photograph to a surviving brother of the deceased soldier, he identified
the victim as Federico. Thus, according to Richard Whelan, the story had
come full circle. Capa's "Loyalist," according to the Stern "really did
fall in battle." And thus the overall credibility of the photographer was
rehabilitated. As Capa expressed it at the time in an interview with the
World Telegram: "No tricks are necessary to take pictures in Spain. You
don't have to pose your camera [i.e., pose your subjects]. The pictures
are there, and you just take them. The truth is the best picture..."
|
|
|
|
Robert
Capa
Robert Capa (Budapest, October 22, 1913 – May 25, 1954) was a 20th century
combat photographer who covered five different wars: the Spanish Civil
War, the Second Sino-Japanese War, World War II across Europe, the 1948
Arab-Israeli War, and the First Indochina War. He documented the course of
World War II in London, North Africa, Italy, the Battle of Normandy on
Omaha Beach and the liberation of Paris. Capa's younger brother, Cornell
Capa, is also a photographer.
|
|

|
|
Robert Capa. Pablo
Picasso et Francoise Gilot
(en arriere-plan, le neveu de Picasso Javier Vicaro), Golfe-Juan), 1948
|
|

|
|
Robert Capa. Le
tour de France,
Le magasin de cycles de Pierre Cloarec a Quimpe, 1939.
|

|
|