|
|
|
The landscape painter
The aesthetic characteristics of most of the pictures from this
period contain a very personal echo, stripped of any baroque
convulsion, of the «stylization» in vogue among the painters who
were propagating the arabesques of Art Nouveau — Maurice Denis,
Serusier, Ranson, Vallotton, and others. Its manifestations are
less exuberant in Munch's work, but his forms have become
rounded, almost soft, and the lines are flexuous, with the
colors arranged in simplified masses.
He painted his best landscapes in this stylistic conception —
White Night, The Island (private collection), and
Train Smoke (Munch Museet,
Oslo) — around 1900. In these canvases, too, Munch displays his
most interesting personality as a colorist. A single dominant
tone, sometimes a very beautiful blue, places his landscapes
beyond realism. Yet they impose themselves upon our gaze with
such great power of evocation, and bring to us with such
intensity the feeling of a special time of day — one of those
spellbinding moments of the northern twilight, for instance,
when the unusual clarity of the sky is fixed as if in a refusal
to give way before the nocturnal shadows — that a profound
current of poetic emotion, felt only through the contemplation
of nature, is established between it and us.
|
|
|
|
|
|

White Night
1901
|
|
|
|
|
|

Winter Landscape Near Krageroe
1925
|
|
|
|

Lubeck Harbor with the Holstentor
|
|
|
|
|
|

The Wave
1921
|
|
|
|
|
|

Noche de verano en Aasgaardstrand
|
|
|
|
|
|

Old Trees
|
|
|
|
|
|

Claro de luna
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moreover, it is strange to note that the almost oneiric
impression that emanates from the groups revolving in The Dance
of Life reappears in groups of trees in his landscapes, which
are stamped with a similar melancholy. Perhaps the spectator
must himself have daydreamed for many an hour on the shores and
in the immense forests of Norway (as I have done during her pink
and green nights) to be aware of the extent to which a fir tree
can suddenly appear to be on the verge of escaping from its
sylvan shape, ready to spring to life in a human metamorphosis.
This is what makes Munch's landscapes so disturbing: a silent
thought seems to be thinking itself in a secret, inner plant
life.
Among the themes he treated in a number of versions, that of
Girls on the Jetty provided the occasion for a series of
paintings between 1894 and 1903, all of them in the same style
(that of The Dance of Life and the landscapes) and in a similar
decor, but with a change of figures or a difference in their positions.
The three girls are first seen from behind, leaning on the
railing and looking into the water, in which the green mass of a
large tree is reflected. One is blond, another a
brunette, and the third a redhead, as if Munch wished to
synthesize all the natures of woman. (Later we shall see the
importance Munch attached to women's hair.) In a 1900 version (Kunsthalle,
Hamburg), one of the girls has turned around. Women on the Jetty
(Thielska Galleriet, Stockholm) shows us a group of women in the
middle of the bridge. All these canvases were painted in
Aasgaardstrand, a coastal village on the Oslo fjord, which Munch
visited for the first time in 1889, and to which he often
returned to work. The bridge theme was to return more than once,
even after 1930, in a total of about a dozen painted and
engraved works on the subject.
|
|
|
|
|
|

Girls on the Jetty
1901
|
|
|
|
|
|

Girls on a Bridge
1899-1900
|
|
|
|
|
|

Mujeres sobre el puente
|
|
|
|
|
|

Girls on the Jetty
|
|
|
|
|
|
This style, however, with its simplified forms and rather pale
colors, apparently did not suit Munch for all the subjects he
painted. He had tried to apply it to a not very successful
canvas, The Dead Mother (between 1896 and 1899). He repeated the
subject around 1900 (Kunsthalle, Bremen), under the same title
but in a more realistic style, and here he achieved a great
dramatic intensity by depicting the terrified little girl with
her back to the bed on which her mother lies and holding her
hands to her ears (in a gesture similar to that of the person in
The Scream as if death is for her a funereal music that she
cannot bear to hear).
Similarly, when he paints a portrait (and throughout his life he
was an excellent portrait painter), Munch forgets this
symbolizing tendency, in which each form contributes its share
of movement to the general arabesque of the painting, in order
to concentrate all his attention on the expression of a face.
His aesthetic system had nevertheless evolved since the austere
portraits of his sisters Laura and Inger, painted between 1881
and 1884.
|
|
|
|

The Dead Mother
|
|
|
|
|
|

The Dead Mother
|
|
|
|
|
|

The Dead Mother
|
|
|
|
|
|

Inheritance
|
|
|
|

Junto al lecho de muerte
|
|
|
|
|
|

Junges Madchen am Strande
|
|
|
|
|
Munch's favorite model, the one to which he always returned, was
himself, and he left innumerable self-portraits. He seems to
question this face more intensely in each one, as if hoping to
discover in it something new about his own tormented nature.
He had begun painting his own portrait in 1880, during his first
year of art studies. The second self-portrait dates from
1881-1882, when Munch was not yet twenty. In it he is handsome
Edvard, with features full of a romantic melancholy to which the
severe'style of the picture is well suited. By 1886 the
treatment had become much more free, almost that of a sketch,
except for the essential features of the face — the eyes, nose,
and mouth — which he worked out more thoroughly. In 1895 a
different man appears in the very beautiful Self-Portrait with
Cigarette. Maturity has changed the features; the
lips are shadowed by a small moustache, and Munch's gaze has
acquired a rather peculiar look that is emphasized by the
somewhat eerie lighting of the face. This portrait can be
regarded as a prefiguration of the self-portrait In Hell (Oslo, Kommunes Kunstsamlinger), which we have already discussed.
At this time Munch was preoccupied with the tragic side of life.
For him, the true meaning of life was understood only in its
orientation toward death. A lithograph Self-Portrait of 1895 has
a black background and the skeleton of an arm at the bottom of
the picture. Perhaps he had seen the 1889 engraving by James Ensor in which the Belgian painter had depicted himself in the
form of a skeleton. In any event, the strange thing is that
Munch conceived this skeleton depiction of his own hand seven
years prior to the day on which he actually lost a finger joint
from his left hand during a violent argument to which we shall
refer later. (This almost premonitory event can be compared with
the case of Victor Brauner, who in 1938 lost his left eye, under
similar circumstances, six years after painting a Self-Portrait with Missing Eye
and a
complete series of pictures composed around the theme of ocular
mutilation.)
|
|
|
|
|
|

Self-Portrait with
Cigarette
1895
|
|
|
|
|
Philosophy, literature, and Symbolist poetry all play an
important role in Munch's painting. He saw himself as the poet
of the great poem of life, and as such he depicts himself in
Self-Portrait with Lyre, a very beautiful drawing of 1897-1898.
For several years, especially after 1893, he had been dreaming
of a large fresco on a theme dear to his heart, that of Love and
Death, for which he made numerous sketches. In 1902 a
composition took shape that was to become The Frieze of Life,
and on which he was to spend many years working. The
composition, divided into four parts — Birth of Love, Bloom and
Decay of Love, Fear of Life, and Death — summarizes in one vast
synthesis all the ideas and torments that dominated his entire
life. As we have seen, many of his pictures are tentative
approaches to or echoes of this theme. Moreover, he established
a link binding together all his pictures, saying that in order
to fully understand his work it was helpful to look at several
pictures in juxtaposition, since their significance was better
revealed by simultaneous study of the group.
However, the desire to achieve a major ideological work often
led Munch to concentrate his attention on the symbolic content
of this work, to the detriment of its pictorial expression. We
prefer the less ambitious canvases, born of his passionate
observation of the simple scenes of intimate life, and which,
unbeknownst to him, are in their own way the isolated fragments
of a more interesting « frieze of life.»
This is the case with a canvas of 1890, in its 1894-1895 version
(the original was destroyed by fire): The Day After. In the image of this woman stretched out on her bed, her
unbound hair falling toward the floor, with glasses and bottles
on a table in the foreground, there is none of the anecdotal
realism that such a subject might imply. The impression of an
unbalanced life and thinking deranged by drunkenness emanates
with spellbinding power from the simple linear schema on which
the painting is built: a surging movement of curves and oblique
lines in which the eye searches in vain for a straight line on
which to rest.
|
|
|

|