|

|
|
History of Photography
Introduction
History of Photography
A World History of Photography
The Story Behind the Pictures 1827-1991
Photographers' Dictionary


|
|
|
Chapter 7
|
|
ALFRED HORSLEY HINTON
GEORGE DAVISON
ALEXANDER KEIGHLEY
JOHN DUDLEY JOHNSTON
JAMES CRAIG ANNAN
FRANK MEADOW SUTCLIFFE
FREDERICK H. EVANS
ROBERT DEMACHY
(collection)
E. J. CONSTANT PUYO
PIERRE DUBREUIL
HUGO HENNEBERG
HANS WATZEK
RUDOLF DUHRKOOP
(collection)
MINYA DIEZ-DUHRKOOP
HUGO ERFURTH
(collection)
OSKAR and THEODOR HOFMEISTER
NICOLA PERSCHEID
HEINRICH BECK
OTTO SCHARF
JOSE ORTIZ ECHAGUE
(collection)
SERGEI LOBOVIKOV
ALEXIS MAZOURINE
|
|
|
ART PHOTOGRAPHY
ANOTHER ASPECT
1890-1920
|
Pictorialist Societies: Goals and Achievements
|
By the early 1890s, established
photographic societies, set up in an era when objectives in photography
were largely undifferentiated, no longer served the needs of all
photographers. Unconcerned with, and indeed often contemptuous of, the
commercial and scientific aspects of photography that the older societies
accommodated, partisans of aesthetic photographs began to form groups
whose sole aim was to promote camera art. The Secession movement led to
the formation of the Wiener Kamera Klub in 1891, The Linked Ring in 1892,
the Photo-Club de Paris in 1894, and the Photo-Secession in New York in
1902. In the same years, amateur photographic societies in Germany, Italy,
the Hapsburg domains, Russia, and the smaller cities of the United States
made available forums for the exchange of information about aesthetic
concepts and processes, and provided exhibition space for the work of
local Pictorialists and that of the better-known figures of the Secession
movement.
Exhibiting aesthetic photographs
in an appropriate context was a paramount goal of the movement. Besides
sponsoring their own gallery spaces, the most famous of which was the
Little Galleries of the Photo-Secession in New York (known as "291"),
photographers attempted to interest galleries, museums, and fine arts
academies in displaying camera images either alone or in conjunction with
examples of graphic art. They urged also that photographers be represented
on the juries of selection for photo-graphic shows, since they alone would
have the experience to separate imaginative and tasteful from uninspired
works. Starting in 1893, and continuing into the 20th century, a number of
prestigious institutions in Germany and the United States began to exhibit
camera images, among them the Royal Academy in Berlin, the Hamburg
Kunsthalle, and the Albright, Carnegie, and Corcoran galleries in the
United States. Artistic photographs were exhibited at several of the large
fine and decorative art exhibitions, including one sponsored by the Munich
Secession in 1898. and the international shows at Glasgow in 1901 and in
Turin in 1904. An exhibition devoted entirely to artistic photography held
in 1891 under the auspices of the Club der Amateur-Photogmphien of Vienna
became a model for annual exhibitions or Salons that were started in
London and Hamburg in 1893, in Paris in 1894, and in Brussels. Vienna, and
The Hague in the following years.
Art photography attracted
articulate support in periodicals and books. Before 1890, photographic,
literary, and general interest journals in Europe and the United States
had devoted space to a discussion of the artistic merits of the medium,
and while they continued to do so, after 1890 a literature whose sole
purpose was to promote the movement flowered not only in the cosmopolitan
centers of the west but in Russia, Italy, and Eastern Europe. Camera Work,
launched in New York in 1905 by members of the Photo-Secession, and
praised for the exceptional level of design and gravure reproduction it
maintained throughout its 14 years of existence, was one of a number of
periodicals that included Photogram, La Revue Photographique and
Photographische Kunst in which similar aesthetic positions were as lucidly
(if not as tastefully) embraced. Magazines with a popular readership also
included articles on artistic photography. Between 1898 and 1918, for
example, American art critic Sadakichi Hartmann, who was eulogized "as the
first art critic who realized the possibility of photography being
developed into a fine art," placed some 500 articles on artistic
photography in a variety of American and European journals. Around 1900,
Mill-length works conceived in the tradition of earlier tracts on
photographic art by Emerson or Henry Peach Robinson formulated the
theoretical arguments for aesthetic photography'. To cite but two, La
Photographic estelle une art? by French critic Robert de la Sizeranne—a
work exceptionally influential in Eastern Europe as well as in France—and
Photography as a Fine Art, by the American critic Charles Caffin,
attempted to convince the cultivated viewer that since the same expressive
concerns animated all artists no matter what medium they used, the same
criteria should be applied to images made by camera and by hand.
The Linked Ring—the first major
organization to institutionalize the new aesthetic attitudes—was formed by
a number of English amateurs whose disenchantment with The Photographic
Society of London (renamed the Royal Photographic Society in 1894)
prompted them to secede from that body in 1891 and 1892. This group, which
included George Davison, Alfred Horsley Hinton (editor after 1893 of
Amateur Photography), Maskell, Lydell Sawyer, and Henry Peach Robinson,
modeled their organization on a contemporary art group—the New English Art
Club—and encouraged members, accepted by invitation only, to pursue "the
development of the highest form of Art of which Photography is capable."
Though Emerson himself was not a member, the Ring followed his precept
that "a work of art ends with itself; there should be no ulterior motive
beyond the giving of aesthetic pleasure. . . ." They established
relationships with Pictorialist photographers in other countries, some of
whom were honored with invitations to become "Links" and to submit work to
the yearly exhibitions at the annual Salon of Pictorial Photography, known
as the London Salon. British members seem to have been inspired primarily
by landscape; their work is marked by the unusually somber moods visible
in gum prints by Hinton (pi. no. 365) or in Davison's The Onion Field
(also called An Old Farmstead, pi. no. 366), made using a camera with a
pinhole instead of a lens. Combining the rural subject matter of
Naturalistic photography with an impressionistic treatment that makes all
substances—fields, buildings, sky, and clouds—appear to be made of the
same stuff, this work was exceptionally influential among photographers of
the time. For example, it prompted Alexander Keighlcy, a photographer of
somewhat derivative genre scenes, to turn to romantic soft-focus
treatments of landscape (pi. no. 367). A similar use of atmospheric haze
and broad shapes and tonalities in dealing with city themes can be seen in
John Dudley Johnston's Liverpool—An Impression (pi. no. 368), a pensive
view with subtle Whistler-like nuances achieved by consummate handling of
the gum process.
|

|
365. ALFRED HORSLEY HINTON. Recessional, c. 1895.
Gravure print. Royal
Photographic Society, Bath. England.
|

|
366. GEORGE DAVISON. The Onion Field, 1890.
Gravure print. Kodak
Museum, Harrow, England.
|

|
367. ALEXANDER KEIGHLEY. Fantasy, 1913.
Carbon print. Royal
Photographic Society, Bath, England.
|

|
368. JOHN DUDLEY JOHNSTON. Liverpool—An Impression, 1906.
Gum bichromate print. Royal Photographic Society, Bath. England.
|
James Craig Annan, Frederick H.
Evans, and Frank M. Sutcliffe represent members of the Ring who favored
straight printing and chose to evoke poetic feelings through means other
than the manipulation of printing materials. Annan, an accomplished
gravure printer,' produced artistic effects by the subtle handling of
light and shadow seen in the linear patterns in the water in Black Canal
(pi. no. 369). Sutcliffe suggests the ethereal quality of fog-enshrouded
places in View of the Harbor (pi. no. 370) by his control of the
relationship of foreground to background tonalities. In Kelmscott Manor:
In the Attics, Evans, the Ring's most esteemed architectural
photographer, summons up a serene sense of peacefulness and of humane
order in the arrangement of architectonic elements and delicate
tonalities.
The Photo-Club de Paris was
organized in 1894 by Maurice Bucquct to provide an alternative to the
professionally oriented Soriete Frangaise de Photographies in the same
year it inaugurated an annual Salon. Members included Demachy, LeBegue,
and E. J. Constant Puyo, all ardent enthusiasts of handwork. Up until
1914, when he gave up the medium, Demachy used his considerable means and
leisure to promote artistic photography and its processes, collaborating,
as has been noted, with Maskell in 1897 and with Puyo in 1906 on a manual
of artistic processes in photography. In his own work, he favored nudes,
bucolic landscapes, and dancers, and frequently printed in red, brown, and
gray pigments using the gum process. The images of ballet dancers (pi. no.
372) were considered "delightful" by his contemporaries, but when compared
with paintings and drawings on this theme by Edgar Degas, they seem
derivative and lacking in vitality, Puyo, a former commandant in the
French army, at times favored impressionistic effects in landscape and
genre scenes (pi. no. 373) and at other times sharply defined Art Nouveau
decorative patterns, especially in portraits of fashionable women. He
designed and used special lenses to create these effects but also condoned
extensive manipulation as a way of vanquishing what he called
"automatism"—that is, the sense that the image was produced by a
machine-without feeling. Other members included Leonard Misonne, a Belgian
photographer of city and rural scenes, and Dubreuil, who portrayed
pastoral landscapes around Lille (pi. no. 374) in the manner of the French
painter Constant Troyon, but later adopted modernist ideas.
The earliest international
exhibition of Pictorialist works in German-speaking countries took place
in Vienna in 1891 under the auspices of the Wiener Kamera Klub. It was
seen by the Austrian Kuehn and the Germans Hugo Henneberg (pi. no. 375)
and Hans Watzek (pi. no. 376); three years later these three emerged as
the most prominent art photographers in eentral Europe, exhibiting
together as the Trifolium or Kleeblatt. In Germany, the exhibitions held
at Berlin, Hamburg, and especially Munich toward the end of the 19th
century had made it clear that the camera was more than a practical tool
and that the photograph might be a source of aesthetic pleasure as well as
information.
Portraiture was one of the first
motifs to be affected by the new sensibility, with inspiration coming from
an exhibition of portraits by David Octavius Hill and Robert Adamson
included in the Hamburg International Exhibition in 1899 and in an
exhibition in Dresden in 1904. Portrait photographers began to realize
that artistic discrimination in lighting, combined with attention to
expressive contour, might create more evocative works than was possible
with the unmodulated studio illumination that played evenly over
conventionally posed sitters. This awareness prompted a new approach by
the well-known portrait team of Rudolf Duhrkoop and his daughter Minya
Diez-Duhrkoop (pi. no. 377) in Hamburg and by Hugo Erfurth in Dresden. The
strong tonal contrast and attention to contour in Erfurth's portrait of
Professor Dorsch (pi. no. 378) continued to mark the persuasive portraits
made by this photographer into the 1920s. Other portraitists of the time
whose work reflected an interest in artistic lighting and treatment were
Nicola Perscheid, working in Berlin and Leipzig, and the partners Arthur
Benda and Dora Kallmus—better known as Madame D'Ora—who maintained a
studio in Vienna from 1907 through 1925. Besides printing in silver and
gum, all three were interested in a straight color printing process known
as Pinatype, a forerunner of dye-transfer printing invented in France in
1903 (see A Short Technical History, Part II).
|

|
369. JAMES CRAIG ANNAN. A Black Canal (Probably Venice), 1894.
Gravure
print. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York; Alfred Sticglitz Collection.
|

|
370. FRANK MEADOW SUTCLIFFE. View of the Harbor, 1880s.
Carbon print.
Photography Collection, New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox, and Tilden
Foundations.
|

|
372. ROBERT DEMACHY. A Ballerina, 1900.
Gum bichromate print.
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York; Alfred Stieglitz Collection.
|
Robert Demachy
(see collection)
(1859-1937)
Demachy, a Frenchman, was a banker by profession, and an amateur artist,
becoming a leading photographer in the 1890s. He was the founder of the
Photo Club of Paris, a member of London's Linked Ring, and of the
Photo-Secession.
An influential photographer of the time was Dr. P. Emerson, who fostered a
more subjective approach to photography than hitherto. As a result, there
was an emphasis on minimum detail and soft focus.
However, for some photographers this was as far as one should go; it was
perfectly admissible to control one's photography at the camera stage, but
one should not tamper with the photograph at the printing stage beyond
employing very modest negative re-touching techniques.
his was not sufficient for other photographers, and Robert Demachy,
together with other photographers such as George Davidson and Alfred
Maskell began to experiment at the printing stage as well. A familiar
phrase attributed to Demachy is "The end justifies the means", which sums
up his approach to picture making.
His photographic work was quite diverse; he exhibited portraits, street
scenes and figure studies, and wrote a a number of books and about a
thousand articles on photography.
He is an interesting photographer to study because his work epitomises the
controversy which existed in the world of photography at the turn of the
century. Demachy had little time for the "straight print" photographers,
especially if they presumed to call themselves artists. No straight print,
he declared, with "its false values, its lack of accents, its equal
delineation of things important and useless" could really be called art.
"A straight print may be beautiful, and it may prove.. that its author is
an artist; but it cannot be a work of art... A work of art must be a
transcription, not a copy, of nature...This special quality.." (which
makes it a work of art) "is given in the artist's way of expressing
himself... If a man slavishly copies nature, no matter if it is with hand
and pencil or through a photographic lens, he may be a supreme artist all
the while, but that particular work of his cannot be called a work of
art..."
However, perhaps to counter argument, he also made the observation that
manipulation was not necessarily art: "Too many pictorialists will meddle
with their prints in the fond belief that any alteration, however
bungling, is the touchstone of art...."
In addition to deliberately using soft focus lenses to blur and soften the
image, he also used printing processes which required manipulation. The
final result was by no means pure photography, because the finished result
in many of his pictures was achieved by using brushwork together with
photography.
An example of this technique is his Figure Study from an Etched Negative,
a gum print produced in 1906. One can readily see the long diagonal lines
etched over the body greatly reducing photographic detail.
Among his favourite subjects was young ballet dancers, in a style very
much reminiscent of Degas' work. He also made studies of people.
A powerful image is En Bretagne, which must be a composite from a number
of negatives.
|

ROBERT DEMACHY.
Vitesse
(Speed), 1903
|

|
373. E. J. CONSTANT PUYO. Summer, 1903.
Green pigment ozotype.
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York; Alfred Stieglitz Collection.
|

|
374. PIERRE DUBREUIL. Dusk on the Marsh in the Snow, 1898.
Silver
bromide print. Museum fur Kunst und Gewerbe, Hamburg.
|

|
375. HUGO HENNEBERG. Italian Landscape and Villa, 1902.
Pigment gum
print. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York; Alfred Stieglitz Collection,
1933.
|

|
376. HANS WATZEK. Still Life, from the portfolio Gummidrucke, c. 1901.
Gravure print. Art Museum, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
|

|
377. RUDOLF DUHRKOOP AND MINYA DIEZ-DUHRKOOP. Alfred Kerr, 1904.
Oil
pigment print. Royal Photographic Society, Bath. England
|
RUDOLF DUHRKOOP
(see collection)
(German, 1848-1918)
|

RUDOLF DUHRKOOP.
Memorie
|

|
378. HUGO ERFURTH. Professor Dorsch, 1903.
Gum bichromate print.
Staatliehe Landesbildstcllc, Hamburg; Museum fur Kunst und Gewerbe,
Hamburg.
|
HUGO ERFURTH
(see collection)
(German, 1874-1948)
Was a German photographer known for his portraits of celebrities and
cultural figures of the early twentieth century.
|

HUGO ERFURTH.
Portrait of boy,1906
|
Landscapes, still life, and
tigural compositions, many of which were subject to extensive
manipulation, absorbed both professional and amateur photographers in
Germany. Large works in gum in strong colors, produced jointly by the
Hamburg amateurs Oskar and Theodor Hofmeister (pi. no. 379), were
exhibited at the London Salon and 291, and collected by Stieglitz, but
other German Pietorialists were equally adept and turned out images
similar in style and quality; The Reaper (pi. no. 380), a gum print in
blue pigment by Perseheid, is typical of the genre. Heinrich Beck, a minor
government official, was awarded a silver medal at the 1903 Hamburg
exhibition of art photography (pi. no. 381); Georg Einbeek, a former
painter, combined graphic and photographic techniques to create exhibition
posters; and Gustav E. B. Trinks, an employee of an import-export company,
exhibited silver bromide and gum prints at all the important Pictorialist
exhibitions. Otto Scharf, in his time one of the most respected art
photographers in Germany, was extravagantly praised for the brilliance
with which he handled silver, platinum, and colored gum materials to evoke
mood and feeling in scenes typified by Rhine Street, Krefeld (pi. no.
382), a green gum print of 1901.
Artistic photography made headway
elsewhere in Europe, too, with individuals in Holland, Belgium, and the
Scandinavian countries drawing inspiration from Pictorialist activity in
France and Germany. The work of Finnish photographers Konrad Inha (born
Nystrom) and Wladimir Schohin suggests the range of artistic camera work
outside the better-known cosmopolitan centers of Europe. Inha, a
journalist, made romantic images of rural landscape and peasant life in
the Naturalist mode, which he published in 1896 as Pictorial Finland,
while Schohin, owner of a retail business in Helsinki, used carbon, gum,
and bromoil processes, and experimented with Auto-chrome, in his
depictions of the middle-class life of his milieu.
To the south, the city of Turin,
Italy, played host to the International Exposition of Modern Decorative
Art in 1903, thereby providing Italians with an opportunity to see a
collection of American works selected by Stieglitz. A year later, La
Fotqgrafica Artistica, an Italian review of international pictorial
photography was founded, and a small sroup began to make artistic works in
the medium. Their work ran a gamut from the previously mentioned
reconstructed religious scenes to genre studies of provincial life to
atmospheric landscapes. The Spanish amateur photographer Jose Ortiz
Echague began to work in the Pictorialist style around 1906, continuing in
this tradition until long after the style had become outmoded; his
artfully posed and lighted genre images (pi. no. 383), reproduced in
several publications on Spanish life that appeared during the 1930s, tend
toward picturesqueness.
Despite the political instability
and economic changes taking place in eastern Europe and the continued
emphasis in many localities on ethnographic photographs to advance the
cause of nationalism, a strong interest in photography as self-expression
led to the formation of amateur Pictorialist societies in the major cities
of an area that now includes Czechoslovakia, Rumania, and Hungary, with
the movement especially vital in Poland. The Club of Photographic Art
Lovers and the journal Photographic Review, established in Lvov in 1891
and followed by similar groups in other Polish cities, provided an
opportunity for the exhibition and reproduction of the works of important
Pictorialists, including Demachy, Kuchn, and Steichen. The president of
the Lvov group, Henryk Mikolasch observed that artistic photographs might
"reflect thought, soul, and word," in place of "tasteless and pedantic...
exactness," a concept that led him to idealize peasant life in his own
images, which he printed in gum with much Pictorialist photography outside
of London, Paris, and New York, artistic camera work in Poland was firmly
tied to naturalism and the Barbizon tradition, to which the so-called
ennobling processes added a sense of atmosphere; eventually these means
were integrated into the modernist style that emerged in Poland in the
1920s (see Chapter 9).
Around 1900, the concept of art
photography attracted a number of Russian photographers of landscape and
genre, who heeded the call by Nikolai Petrov, later artistic director of
the Pictorialist journal Vestnik Fotografi (Herald of Photography), to go
beyond the unfeeling representation of nature. Employing gum and pigment
processes, they, too, adopted a creative approach to subjects taken from
Russian village life. This work, exemplified in photographs by Sergei
Lobovikov (pi. no. 384) that were exhibited in Dresden, Hamburg, and Paris
as well as in Russia, also evolved from the concept of the nobility of
peasant life, but with their subtle balance of art, documentation, and
compassion they have a distinctive character that avoids sentimentality.
In contrast, Alexis Mazourine, descendant of an esteemed Moscow family,
sought inspiration in the more cosmopolitan centers of Hamburg and Vienna,
where his platinum landscapes (pi. no. 385) and figure compositions were
as well known as in his own country. A group that emerged in Japan around
1904 devoted itself to art photography, producing lyrical, soft-focus
scenes that often resemble popular paintings.
|

|
379. OSKAR AND THEODOR HOFMEISTER. The Haymaker, c. 1904.
Gum bichromate print. Royal Photographic Society, Bath, England.
|

|
380. NICOLA PERSCHEID. The Reaper, 1901.
Gum bichromate print. Museum
fur Kunst und Gewerbe, Hamburg.
|

NICOLA PERSCHEID. Untitled
|

|
381. HEINRICH BECK. Childhood Dreams, 1903.
Gum bichromate print.
Museum fur Kunst mid Gewerbe, Hamburg.
|

|
382. OTTO SCHARF. Rhine Street, Krefeld, 1898.
Gum bichromate print.
Museum rur Kunst und Gewerbe, Hamburg.
|

|
383. JOSE ORTIZ ECHAGUE. Young Singers, c. 1934.
Direct carbon print.
San Diego Museum of Art; purchased by the Fine Arts Society, 1934.
|
JOSE ORTIZ ECHAGUE
(see collection)
(Spanish, 1886-1982)
|

JOSE ORTIZ ECHAGUE.
Seated Woman from Montehermosa, 1931
|

JOSE ORTIZ ECHAGUE.
Cartusian Brother II, 1945
|
|
|

|
384. SERGEI LOBOVIKOV. Peasant Scene, probably late 1890s.
Gelatin
silver print. Sovfoto Magazine and VAAP, Moscow.
|

|
385. ALEXIS MAZOURINE. River
Landscape with Rowboat.
Platinum
print. Staatliche Landesbildstelle, Hamburg; Museum fur Kunst und Gewerbc,
Hamburg.
|

|
|