|

|
|
History of Photography
Introduction
History of Photography
A World History of Photography
The Story Behind the Pictures 1827-1991
Photographers' Dictionary


|
|
|
Chapter 6
|
|
LUMIERE BROTHERS
JULES GERVAIS-COURTELLEMONT
JEAN TOURNASSOUD
STEPHANE PASSET
WILLIAM RAU
HENRY IRVING
HEINRICH KUEHN
FRANK EUGENE
ANNA ATKINS
W. E. KILBURN
T. Z. VOGEL and C. REICHARDT
FELICE BEATO
(collection)
LEWIS CARROLL
(collection)
ADOLPHE BRAUN
EDWARD STEICHEN
(collection)
JAMES CLERK MAXWELL
LOUIS DUCOS DU HAURON
JOHN JOLY
LAURA GILPIN
|
|
|
NEW TECHNOLOGY,
NEW VISION,
NEW USERS
1875-1925
|
|
Photographs in Color
|
Of all the technological innovations occurring in photography between
1870 and 1920, none was more tantalizing or possessed greater potential
for commercial exploitation than the discovery of how to make images in
color. This search, which had begun with the daguerreotype, entailed much
dead-end experimentation before a practicable it temporary solution was
found in the positive glass Autochrome plate, marketed in 1907 by its
inventors the Lumiere brothers (pi. no. 325) (see A Short Technical
History, Part II). Though easy to use, the process required long
exposures, was expensive, and though the colors were subtle they were not
faultless. Because a simple, efficient method of turning the
transparencies into satisfactory photographic color prints was not
available, the images had to be viewed in a diascopc (single) or
stereograph viewer; as late as the 1920s commercial portraitists still
were being advised to send black and white work out to be hand -painted
when a color image was desired. Nevertheless, Autochrome from the start
attracted amateurs with leisure and money, photographers of flowers and
nature, and in the United States, especially, indhiduals and studios
involved in producing commercial images for publication. It also appealed
briefly to aesthetic photographers who recognized at the time that rather
than augmenting reality, color was best treated as another facet of
artistic expressiveness (see Chapter 7).
|

325. UNKNOWN PHOTOGRAPHER (French). Lumiere Brothers, n.d.
Gelatin silver print. La Fondation Nationale dc [3 Photographic,
Lyon, France.
|
French "autochromistes" followed the example of the Lumieres (pi. nos.
342 and 343) in documenting family activities at home, at play, and in
their professions. Among professionals, Jules Gervais-Courtellemont
photographed in the Near and Far East (pi. no. 344) and documented aspects
of World War II; views of military life (pi no. 345) by Jean Tournassoud
(later director of photography for the French Army) are other examples of
interest in this theme. Autochrome appealed to Lartigue; convinced that
"life and color cannot be separated from each other," he took elegant if
somewhat mannered snapshots exemplified by Bibi in Nice (pi. no. 351), and
for a brief while this color process was used in a similar fashion
throughout Europe.
Not surprisingly, amateurs who liked to photograph flowers were
delighted by Autochrome, but it also attracted a serious nature
photographer, Henry Irving, who was quick to recognize the value of even a
flawed system for botanical studies (pi. no. 348). While employed less
frequently by documentary photographers, Autochrome was used by William
Rau, the Philadelphia commercial photographer of railroad images who by
the turn of the century had become interested in artistic camera
expression; Produce (pi. no. 347) is an example of a subject and treatment
unusual in the color work of the time.
While Autochrome (and its commercial variants) was based on the theory
of adding primary colors together on one plate to effect the full range of
spectral hues, experithat used a prism to bring the three color plates
into one sharply focused image. Because of the cumbersomencss of tripling
the exposure, the subjects, taken throughout Rus¬sia, had to be more or
less immobile, but despite the technical and logistical difficulties of
this complicated undertaking, Prokudin-Gorskii produced what surely must
be the most ambitious color documentation of the time. In its early
stages, it was hoped that color would add an element of naturalness to the
image—the missing ingredient in verisimilitude—since actuality obviously
was many-hued rather dian monochromatic as shown in photographs. However,
as photographers began to work with the materials they realized that
rather than making camera images more real, color dyes comprised another
elementments that led to the production of three different color negatives
that subsequently were superimposed and either projected or made into
color prints were also in progress (see A Short Technical History, Part
II). Around 1904, this procedure was used for an extensive documentation
of Russian life conceived by Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii, a
well-educated member of the Russian Imperial Technological Society. An
educational and ethnographic project made with the tsar's patronage, it
involved the production of three color-separation negatives on each plate
by using a camera with a spring-operated mechanism that changed filters
and repeated the exposures three times. After development, these were
projected in an apparatus that had to be considered in terms of its
expressive potential. The recognition that the seductiveness of color— its
capacity to make ordinary objects singularly attractive— would have a
powerful effect on the fields of advertising and publicity was the
paramount stimulus in efforts that led to another breakthrough in color
technology in the 1930s.
By 1890, photography no longer was an arcane craft
practiced by initiates for whom artistic, informational, and social
purposes were conjoined in the same image. Trans-formed and
compartmentalized as a result of changes in materials, processes,
techniques, and equipment, photo-graphs became at once highly specialized
and everybody's business (and for some, big business). In the face of the
medium's capacity to provide information and entertainment on such a broad scale, a small
group of photographers struggled to assert the medium's artistic
potential, to lend weight to an observation made some 40 years earlier
that photography had "two distinct paths"—art and science— "to choose
from."
|

|
342. LUMIERE BROTHERS. Lumiere Family in the
Garden at La Ciotat, c. 1907-15.
Autochrome. Ilford S.A., France.
|

|
343. LUMIERE BROTHERS. Untitled, c. 1907-15.
Autochrome. Fondation Nationale de la Photographic, Lyon. France.
|
Auguste and Louis Lumiere
(From Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia)
The Lumière brothers, Auguste Marie Louis
Nicolas (19 October 1862, Besançon, France – 10 April 1954, Lyon) and
Louis Jean (5 October 1864, Besançon, France – 6 June 1948, Bandol), were
among the earliest filmmakers.
The Lumières held their first private screening of projected motion
pictures March 22, 1895. Their first public screening of movies at which
admission was charged was held on December 28, 1895, at Paris's Salon
Indien du Grand Café. This history-making presentation featured ten short
films, including their first film, Sortie des Usines Lumière à Lyon
(Workers Leaving the Lumière Factory). Each film is 17 meters long, which,
when hand cranked through a projector, runs approximately 46 seconds.
It is believed their first film was actually recorded that same year
(1895)[3] with Léon Bouly's cinématographe device, which was patented the
previous year. The cinématographe— a three-in-one device that could
record, develop, and project motion pictures— was further developed by the
Lumières.
Max and Emil Skladanowsky, inventors of the Bioskope, had offered
projected moving images to a paying public one month earlier (November 1,
1895, in Berlin). Neverless, film historians consider the Grand Café
screening to be the true birth of the cinema as a commercial medium,
because the Skladanowsky brothers' screening used an extremely impractical
dual system motion picture projector that was immediately supplanted by
the Lumiere cinematographe.
|

|
344. JULES GERVAIS-COURTELLEMONT. Canal at Bierre,
1907-20.
Autochrome. Cinematheque Robert Lynon de la Ville de Paris.
|

|
345. JEAN TOURNASSOUD. Army Scene, c. 1914.
Autochrome. Fondation Nationale de la Photographic, Lyon, France.
|

|
346. STEPHANE PASSET. Mongolian Horsewoman, c.
1913.
Autochrome. Albert Kahn Collection, Hauts-de-Seine, France.
|

|
347. WILLIAM RAU. Produce, c. 1910.
Autochrome.
Library Company of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
|

|
348. HENRY IRVING. Cornflowers, Poppies, Oat,
Wheat, Corncockle. c. 1907.
Autochrome. British Museum (Natural History),
London.
|

|
349. HEINRICH KUEHN. Mother and Children on the
Hillside, 1905.
Autochrome. Robert Miller Gallery, New York.
|

|
35O. FRANK EUGENE. Emmy and Kitty, Tutzing,
Bavaria, 1907.
Autochrome. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
|

|
351. JACQ ES HENRI LARTIGUE. Bibi in Nice,1920.
Autochrome.
|
JACQUES
HENRI LARTIGUE
(see collection)
|
The Origins of Color in Camera
|
The images reproduced in this section constitute a brief pictorial
survey of the ways in which color was made part of the photographic image
from the inception of the medium up through the invention of the first
viable additive color process. It opens with an example of a cyanotype, an
early discovery whose brilliant blue was thought to be too unrealistic,
and follows with a selection of daguerreotypes and paper prints that were
hand-colored by tinting or painting to make them more lifelike or
artistic. This group also includes works in carbon and gum bichromate—the
manipulative processes that permitted photographers working from about the
1860s through the turn of the century to introduce colored pigments into
their positive prints. These are succeeded by examples of the early
efforts to produce color images by using colored filters or incorporating
dyes into the light-sensitive film emulsions. The first such color
experiment—an image of a tartan ribbon— is the work of James Clerk
Maxwell, a theoretical physicist who used the additive system to
demonstrate color vision by projecting three black and white images
through colored filters to achieve a surprising full-color image. The
experiments of Ducos du Hauron, John Joly, and Auguste and Louis Lumiere—the
inventors of Autochrome—are shown, as are examples of work in Autochrome
by enthusiasts in Europe and the United States who in the early years of
the 20th century recorded family and friends, documented nature, and made
aesthetic statements using its mellow hues.
|

|
329. ANNA ATKINS. Lycopodium Flagellatum (Algae),
1840S-50S. Cyanotype.
Gemsheim Collection, Humanities Research Center,
University of Texas, Austin.
|

|
330. UNKNOWN PHOTOGRAPHER (AMERICAN). Blacksmiths,
1850s.
Daguerreotype with applied color. Collection Leonard A. Walle, Northville,
Mich.
|

|
331, W. E. KILBURN. The Great Chemist Meeting on
Kennington Common, April 10, 1848.
Daguerreotype with applied color. Royal Library, Windsor Castle, England.
Reproduced by Gracious Permission of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.
|

|
332. T. Z. VOGEL and C. REICHARDT. Seated Girl, c.
i860.
Albumen print with applied color. Agfa-Gevaert Foto-Historama,
Cologne, Germany.
|

|
333. FELICE BEATO (ATTRIBUTED). Woman Using
Cosmetics, c. 1867.
Albumen print with applied color, from a published
album now without title, Yokohama, Japan, 1868.
Art, Prints, and
Photographs Division, New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox, and Tilden
Foundations; Gift of Miss E. F. Thomas, 1924.
|
FELICE BEATO
(see collection)
(From Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia)
Felice Beato (born 1833 or
1834, died c.1907), sometimes known as Felix Beato, was a Corfiote
photographer. He was one of the first photographers to take pictures in
East Asia and one of the first war photographers. He is noted for his
genre works, portraits, and views and panoramas of the architecture and
landscapes of Asia and the Mediterranean region. Beato's travels to many
lands gave him the opportunity to create powerful and lasting images of
countries, people and events that were unfamiliar and remote to most
people in Europe and North America. To this day his work provides the key
images of such events as the Indian Rebellion of 1857 and the Second Opium
War. His photographs represent the first substantial oeuvre of what came
to be called photojournalism. He had a significant impact on other
photographers, and Beato's influence in Japan, where he worked with and
taught numerous other photographers and artists, was particularly deep and
lasting.
The origins and identity of Felice Beato have been problematic issues, but
the confusion over his birth date and birthplace seems now to have been
substantially cleared up. Based on an application for a travel permit that
he made in 1858, Beato was born in 1833 or 1834 on the island of Corfu. At
the time of his birth, Corfu was part of the British protectorate of the
Ionian Islands, and so Beato would have qualified as a British subject.
Corfu had previously been a Venetian possession, and this fact goes some
way to explaining the many references to Beato as "Italian" and "Venetian"
member of the Corfiot Italians. The Beato family is recorded as having
moved to Corfu in the 17th century and was one of the noble Venetian
families that ruled the island during the Republic of Venice.
Because of the existence of a number of photographs signed "Felice Antonio
Beato" and "Felice A. Beato", it was long assumed that there was one
photographer who somehow managed to photograph at the same time in places
as distant as Egypt and Japan. But in 1983 it was shown by Chantal Edel
that "Felice Antonio Beato" represented two brothers, Felice Beato and
Antonio Beato, who sometimes worked together, sharing a signature. The
confusion arising from the signatures continues to cause problems in
identifying which of the two photographers was the creator of a given
image.
|

FELICE BEATO.
Coolie, 1870
|

FELICE BEATO.
Coolie, 1868
|
|
|

|
334. LEWIS CARROLL (REV. CHARLES L. DODGSON).
Beau-ice Hatch, 1873.
Albumen print with applied color. Rosenbach Museum
and Library, Philadelphia.
Trustees of the C. L. Dodgson Estate.
|
LEWIS CARROLL
(see collection)
|

|
335. ADOLPHE BRAUN. Still Life with Deer and
Wildfowl, c. 1865.
Carbon print. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York; David Hunter McAlpin
Fund, 1947.
|

|
336. EDWARD STEICHEN. The Flatiron, 1905.
Gumbichromate over platinum. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
|
EDWARD STEICHEN
(see collection)
(b Luxembourg, 27 March 1879; d West
Redding, CT, 25 March 1973).
American photographer, painter,
designer and curator of Luxembourgeois birth. Steichen
emigrated to the USA in 1881 and grew up in Hancock, MI, and
Milwaukee, WI. His formal schooling ended when he was 15,
but he developed an interest in art and photography. He used
his self-taught photographic skills in design projects
undertaken as an apprentice at a Milwaukee lithography firm.
The Pool-evening (1899; New York, MOMA) reflects his early awareness of the
Impressionists, especially Claude Monet, and American
Symbolist photographers such as Clarence H. White. While
still in Milwaukee, his work came to the attention of White,
who provided an introduction to Alfred Stieglitz; Stieglitz
was impressed by Steichen’s work and bought three of his
photographs.
|

EDWARD STEICHEN.
Nude
|

EDWARD STEICHEN.
Portrait of Miss
Sawyer
|
|
|

|
337. JAMES CLERK MAXWELL. Tartan Ribbon, 1861.
Reproduction print from a photographic projection. Science Museum, London.
|

|
338. LOUIS DUCOS DU HAURON. Diaphanie (Leaves),
1869.
Three-color carbon assembly print. Societe Franchise de Photographic,
Paris.
|

|
339. LOUIS DUCOS DU HAURON. View of Angouleme,
France (Agen), 1877.
Heliochrome (assembly) print. International Museum of Photography at
George Eastman House, Rochester, N.Y.
|

|
340. LOUIS DUCOS DU HAURON. Rooster and Parrot,
1879.
Heliochrome (assembly) print. International Museum of Photography at
George Eastman House, Rochester, N.Y.
|

|
341. JOHN JOLY. Arum Lily and Anthuriums, 1898.
Joly process print. Kodak Museum, Harrow, England.
|

|
352. LAURA GILPIN. Still Life, 1912.
Autochrome.
|

|
|