|

Giorgione
The Tempest
1505-06 |
| |
| |

Giorgione
The Tempest (detail)
1505-06
|
| |
See collection:
Giorgione
|
| |
Giorgione
born c. 1477, Castelfranco Veneto, Republic of Venice
died 1510, Venice
also called Giorgio Da Castelfranco , original name Giorgio
Barbarelli extremely influential Italian painter who was one of the
initiators of a High Renaissance style in Venetian art. His
qualities of mood and mystery were epitomized in “The Tempest” (c.
1505), an evocative pastoral scene, which was among the first of its
genre in Venetian painting.
Life
Nothing is really known about Giorgione's personal life except the
legends reported by the biographer and Mannerist artist Giorgio
Vasari in the two editions (1550 and 1568) of his Vite de' piu
eccellenti pittori, scultori, ed architettori italiani . . . (Lives
of the Most Eminent Italian Painters, Sculptors, and Architects . .
. ). Giorgione's name is given in two surviving documents of 1507
and 1508 as Zorzi da Castelfranco (in Venetian dialect); i.e.,
Giorgio of Castelfranco. The form Giorgione (or Zorzon), which is
customarily used today, first appears in the 1528 inventory of the
Grimani Collection. His name means “tall George,” or “big George,”
implying that he was a large man. Tradition holds that he was
handsome and amorous. Correspondence dated Oct. 25, 1510, between
the celebrated Renaissance patron of the arts Isabella d'Este of
Mantua and her agent Taddeo Albano at Venice mentions Giorgione's
death as having occurred recently, probably caused by the plague
that was raging in Venice at that time. Vasari's biography is the
earliest. It emphasizes the artist's humble origin, his elevated
mind, and his personal charm, but this characterization undoubtedly
was a product of Vasari's imagination, based upon the poetic quality
of Giorgione's paintings.
That the young painter went to Venice to study about 1490 under
Giovanni Bellini, the greatest Venetian master of the day, is
undeniable. The technique, colour, and mood of Giorgione's pictures
are clearly related to Bellini's late style.
|
| |
|
|

Giorgione
Sleeping Venus
c. 1510 |
| |
|
|
|
Works
The commission of 1507 for a painting or paintings to be placed in
the Audience Hall of the Ducal Palace at Venice was perhaps never
completed, since no further notice of the work is recorded.
Giorgione's principal public commission was the execution of
frescoes on the exterior of the Fondaco dei Tedeschi (the German
Exchange), where he painted the figures on the facade over the
canal. The frescoes over the street were carried out by the young
Titian, perhaps under Giorgione's direction. These works, documented
in 1508, are lost, except for fragments that contain faint outlines
of figures.
Aside from the works mentioned in specific documents, the notes on
the art collections of Venice (Notizie d'opere del disegno), written
between 1520 and 1543 by the Venetian patrician Marcantonio Michiel,
contain references to picturesby Giorgione. This information occurs
so shortly after the master's death that it is considered generally
reliable. Of the12 paintings and one drawing listed, five works have
survived: “The Tempest,” “The Three Philosophers,” “Sleeping Venus,”
“Boy with an Arrow,” and “Shepherd with a Flute.”
“The Tempest” is a milestone in Renaissance landscape painting with
its dramatization of a storm about to break. Here is the kind of
poetic interpretation of nature that the Renaissance writers Pietro
Bembo and Jacopo Sannazzaro evoked. This feeling for nature is
probably also intimately related to, though not directly derived
from, the philosophical “naturalism” of the contemporary Venetian
and Paduan Humanists grouped around the important Renaissance
philosopher Pietro Pomponazzi. The meaning of the two people seated
in the foreground of “The Tempest” has been the subject of numerous
interpretations, none of them definitive. Michiel called them a
soldier and a Gypsy. Some literary source of a romantic, Arcadian
nature is generally assumed, since no Renaissance artist would
include two mysterious figures devoid of meaning. The samekind of
evocative literary theme involves the “Pastoral Concert” (c. 1510),
the attribution of which is much debated.
The “Sleeping Venus” (c. 1510) was left unfinished at Giorgione's
death. Michiel stated that the task of adding the landscape
background fell to Titian. The picture itself validates this
statement, for the landscape with buildings in the right distance is
repeated in other works of Titian. Giorgione's “Sleeping Venus”
inaugurates a long series of paintings of the goddess of love in
Venetian art, particularly those of Titian. None, however, achieved
so fully the expressionof remoteness and unselfconscious beauty as
this majestic and ideally conceived figure. “Judith” (c. 1505),
though undocumented, evokes the same concept of universal beauty;
she is more of a goddess than the avenger of her people.
Few religious paintings are mentioned in the early documentary
sources. The panels representing the “Trial of Moses” and the
“Judgment of Solomon” are generally agreed to number among the
artist's first works (c. 1495–1500). Although the figures look
slightly archaic, the beauty of the landscape setting with its soft
melting distances unmistakably reveals the hand of the painter of
“The Tempest.” Most celebrated of his religious pictures is the
“Madonna and Child with SS. Francis and Liberale” (c. 1504;
Castelfranco Veneto). The composition of this painting formsan
equilateral triangle in conformance with the search for geometric
solutions characteristic of the Renaissance mind. Thoroughly in the
spirit of the master are the landscape and the dreamy mood of the
figures, who seem lost in a religious reverie. “The Holy Family” (c.
1508) and the “Adoration of the Shepherds” (c. 1508) are of equally
fine quality. The latter is particularly noteworthy for its
exquisitely adjusted colour.
“The Three Philosophers” (c. 1510) is one of the works Michiel saw
and specifically identified as being by Giorgione. He stated,
however, that it was completed by the Venetian painter Sebastiano
del Piombo after the master's death. The composition and colour are
so fully Giorgione's that Sebastiano could only have added a few
finishing touches. In addition, the dreamy melancholy of the three
men—who represent youth, maturity, and old age—embodies the spirit
of the master. Though the notion ofthree ages of man is surely
implied, little agreement prevailsamong critics as to whether the
three magi, three philosophers, or a literary source in ancient
Roman legend is really intended.
The “Christ Carrying the Cross” (Scuola Grande di San Rocco,Venice)
is widely disputed even today. Nevertheless, Vasari in 1568
specifically stated that the painter was Titian, correcting an error
that he had committed in the edition of 1550 in attributing the
picture to Giorgione. The canvas, much restored and repainted,
possesses no more than archaeological interest. Other questioned
paintings that seem to a number of 20th-century critics to be the
works of Giorgione rather than Titian are “The Adulteress Brought
Before Christ” (c. 1500), the “Madonna and Child with SS. Roch and
Anthony of Padua” (c. 1505), and the “Madonna and Child in a
Landscape” (c. 1504).
|
| |
|
Book of Judith
Aiblical canonsbut included in the Septuagint (Greek
version of the Hebrew Bible) and accepted in the
Roman canon.
The book relates that Nebuchadrezzar, king of
Assyria, sent his general Holofernes on an
expedition against Palestine. At the siege of the
Jewish city of Bethulia, a general named Achior
warned Holofernes of the danger of attacking the
Jews. A beautiful Jewish widow named Judith left the
besieged city in pretended flight and foretold to
Holofernes that he would be victorious. Invited into
his tent, she cut off his head as he lay in drunken
sleep and brought it in a bag to Bethulia. A Jewish
victory over the leaderless Assyrian forces
followed.
The work's historicity is suspect because of
numerous historical and chronological errors. Some
scholars have suggested that the existence of
similar accounts in the Bible (e.g., Jael in the
Book of Judges) and in the interpretive stories of
the Midrash point to an early, common source
(perhaps from the 6th century BC) now lost. Others,
however, view the story as sheer fiction and
attribute it to an anonymous Palestinian Jew who
wrote shortly after the end of the Maccabean revolt
(2nd century BC). According to this view, Judith was
meant to be the female counterpart of Judas
Maccabeus, leader of the revolt, and the book,
discussing a contemporary situation in the guise of
an ancient historical setting, was written to
encourage the Judaean Jews in the uneasy period of
independence following the wars precipitated by the
Maccabean uprising.
The work has apocalyptic overtones insofar as the
enemy attack against Palestine was seen as a combat
between the forces of evil and the people of God.
Religion and patriotism are equated, and emphasis is
also placed on the beliefs that disobedience to the
Law will bring certain punishment and that faith
must remain strong in times of stress. God's
Providence is shown as working through human
instruments,in this case, Judith, not through the
intervention of divine beings. As a work of
literature, Judith maintains a constant dramatic
tension, and its popularity in antiquity is attested
by its preservation in several Hebrew, Greek, Syriac,
and Latin editions.
Encyclopaedia Britannica
|

Giorgione
Judith
c. 1505
|
|
|

Giorgione
Judith (detail)
c. 1505
|

Giorgione
Judith (detail)
c. 1505
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
Influence and significance
In portraiture Giorgione made a most profound and far-reaching
impression. Venetian painters such as Titian, Palma Vecchio, and
Lorenzo Lotto so closely imitated him in the early 16th century that
it is at times virtually impossible to distinguish between them.
Nevertheless, the portrait of a “Youth” (c. 1504) is universally
considered to be by Giorgione. The indescribably subtle expression
of serenity and the immobile features, added to the chiseled effect
of the silhouette and modeling, combine to make the “Youth” an
unforgettable expression of Renaissance man. The same sort of
exquisite refinement and sensibility characterizes the disputed
portrait supposedly of the poet “Antonio Broccardo” (c. 1506).
Accepted by all critics is the portrait of the so-called “Laura,” on
the back of which is an inscription giving the date as June 1, 1506,
and Zorzi of Castelfranco as the painter.
Giorgione's “Self-Portrait as David” (c. 1510), recorded in an
engraving of 1650 by the well-known German engraver Wenzel Hollar,
can safely be considered a much-damaged original that has been
drastically cut down in size. The artist gave his own portrait more
dramatic force by the frown upon his face and by turning the body
inward at an angle to the parapet. Titian adopted the same
arrangement in his portrait of a gentleman in blue (c. 1512; National
Gallery, London), where the initials “TV” (Tiziano Vecellio)
establish him as the painter rather than Giorgione, as was formerly
believed.
Despite considerable recent research, the short-lived master from
Castelfranco still remains one of the most enigmatic of Renaissance
painters. Yet the quality and charm of his paintings have made him
as highly esteemed today as he was in his own time—a Venetian master
of poetic mood created through idealized form, colour, and light.
Harold E. Wethey
Encyclopaedia Britannica
|
| |
|
|
See collection:
Giorgione
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|