Italian Mannerism and Late Renaissance
Encyclopaedia Britannica
I
The hallmarks of Mannerism
The first reaction against
Leonardo,
Michelangelo,
Raphael, and
Andrea del Sarto occurred in Florence between 1515 and1524, during
which time the painters Giovanni Battista (called
Rosso Fiorentino)
and
Jacopo Carrucci Pontormo decisively broke away from the harmony
and naturalism of the High Renaissance style. Their movement,
particularly what might be called their aesthetic anarchy, attracted
the sympathetic attention of some 20th-century art historians,
largely because of affinities such art historians saw between their
work and modern trends, particularly Expressionism. After the lead
given by the German art historian Max Dvorak in his book Uber Greco
und der Manierismus (1921), these 16th-century nonconformists came
to be known as Mannerists. Recent historians have suggested,
however, that the term Mannerism can more accurately be applied to a
very different style initiated in Rome about 1520. Roman Mannerism,
which subsequently spread throughout Europe, is characterized by a
display of the artificiality of art, a thoroughly self-conscious
cultivation of elegance and facility, and a sophisticated delight in
the bizarre.
The term Mannerism is ultimately derived from the Italian word
maniera (literally “style”). It was in the 16th century that maniera
was first consistently used in art criticism to indicate a definable
quality—that of stylishness.
Giorgio Vasari, who is known chiefly
for his biographies of artists (some of whom were his
contemporaries) but who was also an architect and painter, indeed a
Mannerist himself, attributed this absolute quality of stylishness
to
Leonardo,
Michelangelo, and
Raphael, and, above all, to artists
of his own day who had learned their styles from studying these
great masters. Standing at the head of the enormous representational
discoveries of the Renaissance and with an increased knowledge of
antiquity,
Vasari was convinced that his contemporaries were in a
position to understand the secret of true artistic style. This was
the maniera.
Taking
Vasari's quality of maniera as the key to Mannerism, it is
possible to outline some of its hallmarks. In figure style, the
standard of formal complexity had been set by Michelangelo and that
of idealized beauty by Raphael. In the art of their followers,
obsession with style in figure composition often outweighed the
importance of the subject matter. The highest value was placed upon
the apparently effortless solution of considerable artistic
problems, such as the portrayal of the nude figure in complex poses.
Specifically, the finished work was not supposed to betray signs of
the labour that lay behind it.
While depending heavily upon ancient Roman art for many of its
decorative motifs and for many of its standards of design, Mannerist
style commonly exploited a certain degree of license within the
classical vocabulary—what
Vasari and contemporary literary theorists
called “a departure from the normal usage.”
It was in the intellectualizing atmosphere of the Italian courts
that Mannerism met with the greatest favour. There the conscious
intricacies of Mannerist compositions and the eloquent quotations
from antiquity were well appreciated; court literature of this
period displayed many analogous features. Mannerism was first and
foremost a connoisseur's art—certainly not one that appealed to a
churchman. It is not surprising that the later Mannerist painters
were censured by the church during the Counter-Reformation for
painting altarpieces that were intended to demonstrate the
virtuosity of their creators rather than illustrate a religious
story. Even
Michelangelo was attacked, one critic calling him “the
inventor of obscenities, who cultivated art at the expense of
devotion.”
Factors such as these caused the style to fall into general
disrepute, and, when in 1662 the French writer on architectural
theory Freart de Chambray coined the word Manieriste (translated six
years later as “Mannerist” by the English diarist John Evelyn), he
applied it in disparaging fashion to
Vasari and his contemporaries,
the practitioners of the maniera. If, therefore, Mannerism is
identified with the maniera, it can be historically related to a
particular 16th-century style; but if it is applied strictly to
early
Rosso and
Pontormo, as it was by Dvorak, it has no firm
grounding in the way people in the 16th century thought about
painting.