|
|
The Triumph of Sin
|
|

Triptych of Garden of Earthly Delights (central panel
- detail)
c. 1500
Museo del Prado, Madrid
|
|
|

Triptych of Garden of Earthly Delights.
Horses and Riders (central panel
- detail)
c. 1500
Museo del Prado, Madrid
|
|
|
|
In the circular pool in the centre of the painting
women are swimming, standing or disporting themselves. There
are no men. Around the pool men riding horses and other
fabulous animals, such as the gryphon-like creature seen in
the centre here, form a continuous parade. This is the
beginning of lust, the start of the Fall, and Bosch is
noting the nature of sexual attraction. In this detail the
men are all alert and self-conscious. At the top a woman is
peering out of the pool with the temptress Eve's symbol of
the apple, the Forbidden Fruit, perched on her head.
Elsewhere other women arc preparing to leave the pool to
come to the men rather than the men to them. It was the
medieval belief that women were the eager receptive vessels
of lust and the original cause of men's fall from grace. It
is Bosch's most positive statement of the pleasure and pains
of sexual attraction.
|
|
|

Triptych of Garden of Earthly Delights (central panel
- detail)
c. 1500
Museo del Prado, Madrid
|
|
|
|
|
|
At first sight, the central panel confronts us with an idyll
unique in Bosch's work: an extensive park-like landscape
teeming with nude men and women who nibble at giant fruits,
consort with birds and animals, frolic in the water and,
above all, indulge in a variety of amorous sports overtly
and without shame. A circle of male riders revolves like a
great carousel around a pool of maidens in the centre and
several figures soar about in the sky on delicate wings.
This triptych is better preserved than most of Bosch's large
altarpieces, and the carefree mood of the central panel is
heightened by the clear and even lighting, the absence of
shadows, and the bright, high-keyed colours. The pale bodies
of the inhabitants, accented by an occasional black-skinned
figure, gleam like rare flowers against the grass and
foliage. Behind the gaily coloured fountains and pavilions
of the background lake, a soft line of hills melts into the
distance. The diminutive figures and the large, fanciful
vegetable forms seem as harmless as the medieval ornament
which undoubtedly inspired them, and when we stand before
this picture, it is difficult not to agree with Fraenger's
insistence that the nude lovers »are peacefully frolicking
about the tranquil garden in vegetative innocence, at one
with animals and plants, and the sexuality that inspires
them appears to be pure joy, pure bliss«. Indeed, we might
be in the presence of the childhood of the world, the Golden
Age described by Hesiod, when men and beasts dwelt in peace
together and the earth yielded her fruit abundantly and
without effort. Or to put it in more contemporary terms,
Bosch's garden appears to be a sort of universal love-in.
Nevertheless, it must be denied that this crowd of naked
lovers was intended as an apotheosis of innocent sexuality.
The sexual act, which the twentieth century has learned to
accept as a normal part of the human condition, was most
often seen by the Middle Ages as proof of man's fall from
the state of angels, at best a necessary evil, at worst a
deadly sin. That Bosch and his patrons shared fully in this
view we know, of course, from the contexts in which lovers
appear in his other works, and is further confirmed by the
fact that his garden, like the haywain, is situated between
Eden and Hell, the origin of sin and its punishment. Hence,
just as the »Haywain« depicts worldly gain or Avarice, so
the »Garden of Earthly Delights« depicts the sensual life,
more specifically the deadly sin of Lust.
Various aspects of this sin are acted out in a forthright
fashion, by the couple enclosed in a bubble at the lower
left, for example, or the pair near by concealed in a mussel
shell; other figures seem to display perverted acts of love,
such as the man plunged head first into the water and
shielding his privy parts with his hands or, at lower right,
the youth who thrusts some flowers into the rectum of his
companion. Along with these fairly obvious representations,
however, the carnal life is also alluded to in metaphorical
or symbolic terms. The strawberries which figure so
prominently in the landscape, for instance, probably
symbolize the unsubstantial quality of fleshly pleasure;
this was the conclusion of Siguenza who speaks of the
»vanity and glory and transient taste of strawberries or the
strawberry plant [whose] fragrance one can hardly smell when
it passes«. The strawberry is thus analogous to the hay in
the »Haywain«.
The »Garden of Earthly Delights« triptych has been carefully
studied by Dirk Bax*, whose extensive knowledge of older
Dutch literature has led him to identify many of the forms
in the central panel - fruit, animals, the exotic mineral
structures in the background - as erotic symbols inspired by
the popular songs, sayings and slang expressions of Bosch's
time. For example, many of the fruits nibbled and held by
the lovers in the garden serve as metaphors of the sexual
organs; the fish which appear twice in the foreground occur
as phallic symbols in Old Netherlandish proverbs. The group
of youths and maidens picking fruit in the right
middleground also possesses erotic connotations: »to pluck
fruit« (or flowers) was a euphemism for the sexual act. Most
interesting, perhaps, are the large, hollow fruits and fruit
peelings into which some of the figures have crept. Bax sees
them as a play on the medieval Dutch word »schel« or »schil«,
which signified both the »rind« of a fruit and »quarrel« or
»controversy«. Thus, to be in a »schel« was to engage in a
struggle with an opponent, and this included the more
pleasant strife of love. Moreover, the empty rind itself
signified worthlessness. Bosch could have chosen no more
appropriate a symbol for sin, for it was, after all, a fruit
that brought about the fall of Adam.
In the first place, it is significant that Bosch conceived
his image of carnal delight as a great park or garden-like
landscape. The garden had functioned for centuries as a
setting for lovers and love-making. The most famous medieval
love garden was the one described in the »Romance of the
Rose«, a long allegorical poem of the thirteenth century;
translated into many languages including Dutch, it also
inspired numerous imitations in later literature and art.
These love gardens invariably contain beautiful flowers,
sweetly singing birds and a fountain in the centre around
which the lovers gather to stroll or sing, as can be seen in
many tapestries and engravings of Bosch's day. That Bosch
was familiar with this tradition cannot be doubted. An
abbreviated love garden appears in an engraving by his
associate Alart du Hameel, and Bosch himself employed
similar elements in one of his earlier images of Lust, on
the Prado »Tabletop«. In the »Garden of Earthly Delights«,
of course, he incorporated much more of its traditional
iconography, including the fountain and pavilions which
dominate the lake in the background. These curiously
wrought, glittering forms are, in fact, hardly more
fantastic than the fountains and buildings, constructed of
gold, coral, crystal and other precious materials, which are
described in many literary »Gardens of Love«.
Although the »Garden of Earthly Delights« thus owes much to
the conventional love gardens, the inhabitants of the latter
generally behave much more discreetly; very seldom do they
frisk about naked or make love in the water. Nevertheless,
the association of love and love-making with water was
firmly established by Bosch's day. In scenes of the »labours
of the months«, May, the time of love, was illustrated by
lovers embracing in a tub of water. Even representations of
the Fountain (or Pool) of Youth frequently received an
erotic twist. While Bosch does not, strictly speaking, show
a Fountain of Youth, as no one is being rejuvenated, this or
similar prints may have inspired the outdoor water sports of
the »Garden of Earthly Delights«.
To the Garden of Love and the Bath of Venus can be added a
third major theme in the »Garden of Earthly Delights«. The
background lake is given over to mixed bathing, but in the
middle section the sexes are carefully segregated. The
circular pool is occupied only by women, while the men ride
around it on the backs of animals of different species. The
antics of the acrobatic riders, one somersaulting on the
back of his mount, suggest that they are excited by the
presence of the women, one of whom is already climbing out
of the water. By this means, of course, Bosch shows the
sexual attraction between men and women, and it is not
without significance that the pool and cavalcade occupy the
centre of the garden, as the source and initial stage of the
activity elsewhere. To the medieval moralists, who were not
very chivalrous about such matters, it was woman who took
the initiative in leading man into sin and lechery,
following the precedent set by Eve. The power of woman was
often represented by placing her within a circle of male
admirers. But on Bosch's painting men are riding instead of
dancing. Animals traditionally symbolized the lower or
animal appetites of mankind and personifications of the Sins
were often depicted on the backs of various beasts: the act
of riding, finally, was commonly employed as a metaphor for
the sexual act.
For his image of sensual pleasure, Bosch thus fused together
several erotic themes of the Middle Ages within the
framework of the Garden of Love, just as Brant employed the
ship to unify his diatribes on human folly. Bosch was not
the only artist, however, to use the traditional love garden
to symbolize Lust. In a manuscript of St Augustine's »City
of God«, the saint's condemnation of the lascivious customs
of ancient Rome was often illustrated with pictures of nudes
dancing in a garden.
In the final analysis, the meaning of the »Garden of Earthly
Delights« is not inconsistent with Bosch's other moralizing
subjects. Like the »Ship of Fools«, the »Death of the Miser«
and the »Haywain«, it, too, provides a mirror wherein we may
see reflected the folly of man. Nevertheless, we may still
find it difficult to accept the fact that these carefree
lovers are guilty of the deadly sin of Lust. Like Fraenger,
we may object that Bosch can hardly have intended to condemn
what he painted with such visually enchanting forms and
colours. Medieval man, however, was more suspicious of
material beauty. He was taught that sin presents itself
under the most alluring aspects, and that behind physical
loveliness and agreeable sensations often lurked death and
damnation. The visible world, in short, was not unlike those
little ivory carvings popular in Bosch's day which display a
pair of embracing lovers or a voluptuous female nude, but
when turned around reveal a rotting corpse. What Bosch shows
us, in other words, is a false paradise whose transient
beauty leads men to ruin and damnation, a motif common in
medieval literature. We encounter it, for example, in the
legend of theVenusberg, the underground kindgdom of love
where Tannhauser was detained at the peril of his soul. In
the second part added by Jean de Meun to the »Romance of the
Rose«, the garden of the rose is explicitly and unfavourably
compared with the true garden of Heaven. The garden of
Heaven is everlasting, but in the garden of the lovers, the
»dances will reach their end and dancers fail«; everything
will crumble and decay, for Death lies in wait for all. A
similar thought was frequently expressed in
sixteenth-century representations of pleasant gardens where
lovers enjoy themselves, unaware that Death stalks them from
behind.
To return to Bosch's version of this venerable theme, Bax
has plausibly suggested that the hairy couple visible in the
mouth of the cave in the lower right-hand corner of the
garden represent Adam and Eveaftertheir expulsion from Eden,
when, according to apocryphal accounts, they took refuge in
a cave and dressed in animal skins. The head of the man
behind Adam is that of Noah, who re-founded the human race
after the Flood. Indeed, the full implications of the
»Garden of Earthly Delights« are understood only when we
turn to the Garden of Eden and the other scenes of the
triptych.
|
|