Vermeer of Delft
|

The Art of Painting
(detail)
|
|
|
Vermeer's Life
We know very little about Vermeer's life. There is a tradition that he was
baptised in Delft on 31 October 1632, the second child and only son of Reynier
Jansz. His father was born in 1591 in Antwerp. In 1611 he moved to Amsterdam
where he specialised in the silk trade. He married Digna Baltens in 1615 and
settled a short time later in Delft; at that time he bore the name "Vos", and
from 1625 to 1629 he leased an inn. the sign of which was a fox, an allusion to
his name. He continued to maintain his connections with the silk trade, although
he gave art dealing as his main occupation upon being admitted to the Delft
Guild of St. Luke in October 1631. This indicates that he followed a variety of
trades simultaneously.
J. M. Montias has discovered that Vermeer's maternal grandfather, a watchmaker
named Balthasar Claesz. Gerrits, was involved in some shady business deals. From
1619 onwards he and his accomplices used bought moulds to forge coins. This
developed into an affair of such proportions that even the Public Prosecutor and
Prince Maurit's governor became involved. Two of Gerrits' accomplices were
condemned to death and beheaded. Gerrits himself managed to get away, to The
Hague, and finally Gorinchem, where he seems to have lived on undisturbed.
An entry in the Nieuwe Kerk registers shows that Vermeer's father bore the name
"Vermeer" as early as 1625. In 1641 he bought the "Mechelen" inn, which lay in a
good part of the town, on the northern side of the market square, for the sum of
2.700 guilders (not including the mortgage and high interest charges). The inn
dated from the 16th century and, with a total of seven chimneys, offered
luxurious accommodation. The patrons of Reynier's included members of Delft's
refined and affluent bourgeoisie. These social contacts must have made quite an
impression on Vermeer.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
Vermeer's background
Vermeer's father was born in 1591 in Antwerp
and moved to Delft shortly after his marriage
in 1615. He leased an inn there. However,
when he was admitted to the Delft Guild of
St. Luke, he stated that he worked as an art
dealer.
|
|
|
|
|
We know, from a document dated 1640, that Reynier had relations with artists
such as Balthasar van der Ast (already famous in his own day for his paintings
of flowers), Pieter Steenwyck, and Pieter Groenewegen. It may be that these gave
the young Vermeer his first artistic leanings. Nothing is known about his
training as a painter. All that we can say for certain is that he was admitted
as a master to the Guild of St. Luke on 29 December 1653. This guild included
painters in all genres, glass makers and dealers, faience makers, embroiderers
and - art dealers, and until 1620 - carpet weavers too. According to the statutes, a precondition for being admitted was a six-year
apprenticeship to an artist recognised by the Guild. It has been suggested that
this may have been Leonaert Bramer (1594-1674), but the stylistic differences
between this artist (who went to Italy in 1614 and returned to his native town
of Delft in 1624) and Vermeer are so great that there has been little support
for the theory.
|
|
 |
Vermeer
Woman in Blue Reading a Letter
(detail)
Vermeer's wife
Because she was thought to be pregnant, the
Woman in Blue Reading a Letter was
formerly identified with Vermeer's wife; it is
known that she bore fifteen children. However,
attempts to work out the identity of this woman
are superficial and do not contribute anything
to our understanding of the meaning of this
picture. The girl is wearing a farthingale which
appears to be made of crinoline. This piece of
clothing was highly fashionable at the time.
|
|
|
|
An alternative suggestion has been that Vermeer could have
studied with Carel Fabritius (1622-1654) who was trained in
Rembrandt's Amsterdam studio. Fabritius became a citizen of Delft in 1650, and
joined the Guild of St. Luke in 1652. He was killed when the Delft magazine
exploded, destroying much of the town. Dirck van Bleyswyck sang Vermeer's
praises in a four-line piece in his Beschrijvinge der Stadt Delft
(Description of Delft), calling him the "masterly" successor of the "phoenix"
Fabritius. Although not too much emphasis should be placed on such an isolated
comment, it nonetheless confirms that Vermeer was held in no little esteem in
his own day.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
Carel Fabritius
Self-portrait, 1654
Carel Fabritius (1622-1654), who had been a pupil of
Rembrandt's in the 1640s and then settled in Delft in 1650,
is generally supposed to have been Vermeer's teacher.
Fabritius was killed in the explosion of the Delft magazine
in 1654. An obituary describes Vermeer as Fabritius'
successor:
"The phoenix has departed from this world
In the midst of life and fame
A new master has arisen from the ashes
Vermeer will follow in his steps."
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
Register of the Delft Guild of St. Luke,
c. 1675
The register of the Guild of St. Luke is one of the few
documents to contain any information about Vermeer's
life.
Vermeer's name is entry 78,
and Carel Fabritius, who is thought to have been his
teacher,
is entry 75.
|
|
|
|
|
Vermeer married Catharina Bolnes on 20 April 1653, in Schipluy, a small place
near Delft. She was the daughter of Maria Thins, who was at first opposed to the
marriage. It may be, given that she herself was financially well off, and given
that Vermeer's father was at the time in considerable debt, that she did not
consider the marriage to be on a sufficiently secure financial footing. Another
possibility is that there were problems at first because of their different
religious backgrounds: Vermeer was a Calvinist, while Catharina Bolnes was
Catholic. Leonaert Bramer was also a Catholic and put in a good word for
Vermeer, and it was thanks to him that Maria Thins finally dropped her
reservations. It has often been said that Vermeer caused Maria Thins to think
more favourably of him by becoming a Catholic; however, there is no documentary
evidence of this.
At first, the newly married couple lived in the "Mechelen", but then moved to
his mother-in-law's house on the Oude Langendijk in what was known as the
Papists' Quarter, near a Jesuit mission. Vermeer appears to have been relatively
well off at this time, as he had no difficulties supporting his growing swarm of
children. Catharina bore him fifteen children, though four of them died when
still very young. He produced two paintings a year on average and he could
scarcely have met these high costs of living from that income alone. There is no
definite information as to whether he continued to work as the landlord of the "Mechelen",
though such a second job was not at all unusual amongst seventeenth-century
Dutch painters. We might mention Jan Steen (In the Tavern), for instance, who leased the Delft
brewery "de Slange" in 1654.
|
| |
|

Jan Steen
In the Tavern
|
|
| |
|
Vermeer was admitted to the Delft Guild of St. Luke in
1653. Besides painting, he also worked as an art dealer. He
presumably took over the running of his father's inn, the "Mechelen",
once his father died. A contemporary Delft artist, Jan
Steen, who leased a brewery in 1654, painted a number of
scenes in inns. The situations he paints cannot be relied
upon to be completely realistic however, as their intention
is satirical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We can be quite certain, however, that Vermeer worked as an art dealer, like his
father. He would have earned considerably more money by selling other artists'
paintings than by selling his own. But he nonetheless continued to give his
occupation as "painter" whenever he signed official documents. This tied in with
his registration in the Guild of St. Luke; he twice held the office of
Hoofdman (syndic) on the Guild's ruling body, from 1662/63 and 1670/71.
Vermeer's relationship with Maria Thins had improved noticeably, as can be seen
from the fact that his family moved in with her. Maria Thins was separated from
her husband, Reynier Bolnes, the owner of a brickworks, but received a very
large income from real estate, stocks and shares, and credit notes. She
inherited several farms when her sister Cornelia died in 1661, and she leased
out one of them, the "Bon Repas" near Schoonhoven. The extent of Maria Thins'
wealth can be seen from a notarial inventory made in February 1676. It is an
extensive list of the furniture, clothing and household goods contained in the
eleven rooms, cellar and attic. Vermeer's family lived downstairs, and his
studio, with two easels and three palettes, was on the top floor. The studio
contained the heavy oak table which appears in many of Vermeer's paintings,
together with the equally familiar leather-covered chairs. Maria
Thins owned a series of paintings which Vermeer employed as claves interpretandi,
aids to the interpretation of his own paintings, and these included Dirck van
Baburen's The Procuress, and a picture of Christ on
the Cross, which is probably the same as the painting that appears in the
background of Vermeer's Allegory of Faith. Vermeer
also used items of clothing, such as his wife's ermine-trimmed yellow satin
jacket, in his paintings; he sometimes altered their colours, just as he also
tended to adapt any household objects included in his sets, adjusting their
proportions to suit his purpose.
|
| |
 |
 |
|
| |
Rembrandt
Rembrandt and Saskia in the Scene of the Prodigal Son in
the Brothel (detail)
1636
Brothel scenes in seventeenth-century Dutch art developed
from portrayals of the Biblical story of the Prodigal Son.
Even Rembrandt used this theme in a portrait of Saskia and
himself.
|
Vermeer
The Procuress (detail)
1656
Possible self-portrait of Venneer.
What is thought to be the only self-portrait of
Vermeer can be seen in The Procuress.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vermeer probably painted very little for the public art market, most of his work
being produced for those patrons who particularly valued his work. This may also
account for the modest number of paintings he produced. One patron was the baker
Hendrick van Buyten, who is probably the one whom the French nobleman Balthazar
de Monconys visited when the latter stayed in Delft in 1663. He made the
following comment in his journal: "I met the painter Vermeer in Delft, but he
had none of his own paintings at home. We did, however, see one at a baker's,
which had been sold for a hundred livres; I think even six pistoles would have
been too high a price." (A pistole was ten guilders.)
Vermeer's other patron was the Delft printer Jacob Dissius, who lived nearby on
the Marktveld. Nineteen of Vermeer's paintings are mentioned in an inventory of
his property dating from 1682. It is almost certain that the majority of the
twenty-one paintings of Vermeer's auctioned by the art dealer Gerard Houet in
1696 in Amsterdam are these very paintings belonging to Dissius.
A clear indication of Vermeer's reputation as an art expert is that he was given
what was then considered an honourable commission, to authenticate a collection
of Venetian and Roman paintings which had been sold to Friedrich Wilhelm, the
Elector of Brandenburg, by the art dealer Gerard Uylenburgh, for the sum of
30.000 guilders. He rejected the pictures as being "clumsy, slapdash copies".
Vermeer journeyed to The Hague in 1672, together with fellow Delft artist Hans
Jordaens, in order to contest the ascription of the paintings to Raphael and
Michelangelo before a notary. He explained that they were worth at most a tenth
of the sum Uylenburgh had asked.
|
| |

Vermeer's home town
In the seventeenth century, Delft was the centre of the
Dutch tile industry.
Delft potteries were engaged in the attempt to imitate
precious Chinese porcelain.
Faience made in Delft could be found in households up and
down the country.
|
|
|
| |
|
Town plan of Delft
from Willem Blaeu's 1649 Town Atlas
1 The '"Flying Fox" Inn, where Vermeer was
probably born.
2 The "Mechelen" Inn, which was run by
Vermeer's father, Reynier Jansz.
3 The house belonging to Maria Thins,
Vermeer's mother-in-law, which he lived in with his
wife.
4 Position from which Vermeer painted his
View of Delft.
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Vermeer
View of Delft (detail)
|

Vermeer
The Glass of Wine (detail)
His mother-in-law's house Vermeer's family
lived in the lower storey of his mother-in-law's house. The solid oak table and
the leather-covered chairs, all of which appear in many of Vermeer's paintings,
were kept here.
Important leitmotif
White porcelain jugs appear repeatedly in Vermeer's art.
They
contained wine, which was supposed to act as a love potion and help
men seduce women. |
Vermeer's later years were overshadowed by a dramatic deterioration of his
personal financial position. He got into debt and had to take out loans. On 5
July 1675, he went to Amsterdam in order to take out a loan of 1,000 guilders.
War had broken out between the Netherlands and France in 1672, with French
troops advancing rapidly right into the northern part of the United Provinces,
and this had had a ruinous effect on Vermeer. Dykes were opened as a last form
of defence against the French army, and this flooded enormous tracts of land,
including the land that Maria Thins had leased out at Schoonhoven. As a
consequence, Vermeer was no longer paid the rent which had, till then, been a
regular source of income for his family. That disastrous year became known as
the rampjaar, and from then onwards Vermeer did not manage to sell any more
pictures. His wife later commented on this when talking about the destructive
war with France: "Because of this, and because of the large sums of money we had
to spend on the children, sums he was no longer able to pay, he fell into such a
depression and lethargy that he lost his health in the space of one and a half
days, and died."
Vermeer was buried on 15 December 1675, in the family grave at the Oude Kerk,
Delft. He was survived by eleven young children, of whom about eight still lived
at home. Catharina Bolnes now found herself hardly able to satisfy her
creditors, and therefore felt it necessary to apply for the High Court in the
Hague to take charge of the management of her properties. She relinquished all
her rights of inheritance, ceding them to her creditors. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
(1632-1723; cf. p. 75) was appointed trustee of the properties. His main
occupation was as a cloth merchant in Delft, and he was already internationally
renowned for his inventions and discoveries in microscopy; he was made a member
of the Royal Society in London in 1680.
At this time, the only paintings of Vermeer's which Catharina Bolnes still
possessed were the picture known as Schilderconst (The Art of Painting),
and the Woman with a Pearl Necklace. She gave The Art of Painting away
on 24 February 1676, to discharge her mother's debts. Most of the other
paintings were owned at that time by the printer Jacob Dissius, who died in
October 1695. Several months after his death, twenty-one Vermeers were put up
for auction in Amsterdam.
The 1696 auction catalogue, which included pictures by other artists (a total of
134 pictures were auctioned), is extremely useful, for it shows us that Vermeer
was held in high esteem. It is striking that the estimates for his paintings are
by no means low when compared to usual prices. For example, number 1 was the
Woman Weighing Pearls, which is now in Washington; it was estimated at
150 guilders ("it is painted with great skill and vividness"). The price set at
auction for number 31, the View of Delft, was particularly high at 200
guilders. Compare this with Jan Steen, who once received that amount for three
portraits, or Isaak van Ostade, who in 1641 sold thirteen paintings to an art
dealer for 27 guilders. During his best period, Vermeer was clearly at the top
of the price structure of the Delft art market; it is even said that, in or
shortly before 1663, he was paid 600 guilders for a painting containing just one
figure.
|