|
The Face of Spain
|
| |
The Psychology of Power
|
| |
When Velazquez was appointed court painter in Madrid in 1623, his
principal task was to paint portraits of Philip IV, a duty that he
performed to perfection. The Count of Olivares went so far as to say
that by comparison with Velazquez no one had ever yet painted a
"real" portrait of the king: that is to say, so striking and
impressive a likeness of him. The portraits of the Spanish Habsburgs
painted in profusion by Velazquez are surely among the finest and
best examples of court portraiture in the history of European art.
The artist, who had no chance of developing such a wide range of
activities as his colleagues in Paris and Rome, breathed life into
the conventional rigidity of the portrait by adopting a new artistic
viewpoint of greater profundity, not least during his first journey
to Italy. His kings and princes are of course still presented as
representatives of their exclusive social rank, and their ceremonial
bearing is the same as before, but their individuality shows in
their faces and hands.
Philip IV in Armour, a portrait of the period around
1628, over-painted and cut to its present size at a later date,
presupposes the existence of a model such as the portrait of the
king in parade armour painted around 1623, probably by Juan Bautista
Maino (1578-1649). This picture by Philip's Italian-trained drawing
master also shows the subject in a lifelike attitude, but the
modelling of the face in Velazquez' portrait is much more
expressive, and its extrovert clarity shows up more impressively in
contrast to the sash draped decoratively over the armour and painted
in many shades of red.
|
| |

Velazquez
Philip IV in Armour
c. 1628
Oil on canvas, 58 x 44,5 cm
Museo del Prado, Madrid
|
| |

Velazquez
Philip IV
|
| |
When the Infanta Dona Maria, daughter of Philip III and Queen
Margarita, set out for Vienna in December 1629 to meet the husband
who had been chosen for her long before, the king of Hungary, later
Emperor Ferdinand III, her journey included a stay of several months
in Naples in 1630. Velazquez made haste to Naples to portray his
sovereign's sister, who was famous for her beauty. He worked with
the utmost care to emphasize the enamel-like smoothness of her fine
features. Every detail, for instance the typically protuberant
Habsburg lower lip, shows a striking similarity to the living model.
The delicate carmine of her lips, the beautiful Titian shade of her
hair, depicted in relaxed brushstrokes with dark brown shadows and
bright yellow highlights, all display the artistic skill now at the
command of Velazquez in his harmonious combination of state
splendour with the individuality of his sitter. The carefully
modelled face in this head-and-shoulders portrait was to serve as
the basis for several full-length portraits of the Infanta, workshop
copies that may have been intended as gifts to royal residences
abroad; one is in Berlin today.
|
| |

Velazquez
Infanta Dona Maria, Queen of Hungary
1630
Oil on canvas, 60 x 46 cm
Museo del Prado, Madrid
|
| |
The portrait of Philip IV in Brown and Silver was
painted soon afterwards. The unattractive matt white of the
stockings is the result of an unskilful restoration of the picture
in 1936, but otherwise the work is a good example of the skilled
manner that Velazquez had now mastered. The restriction of
surrounding areas and the general pose found in earlier portraits of
the king are still present, but the subject's whole attitude is more
relaxed, the flesh tints, probably under the influence of Rubens,
are painted with more fluidity, the accents of colour - eyes
gleaming like black tortoiseshell, the golden lights on the waves of
the hair - are placed with more emphasis, and shapes conveying
Baroque dignity, such as the profuse folds of the red curtain, have
made their way into the formerly sparse interior. Above all,
Velazquez' new delight in luxuriant colour is reflected in his
depiction of the silk embroidery and the silver and brown tones of
the king's clothing.
|
|
|

Velazquez
Philip IV in Brown and Silver
1631-32
Oil on canvas, 200 x 113 cm
National Gallery, London
The king is holding in his right hand a paper with the
inscription
"Senor/Diego Velazquez/ Pintor de V. Mg" -
the opening words of a petition to him from Velazquez.
|
| |
The picture of Queen Isabel, Standing is similar in
its composition - although the queen is facing the opposite way -
and constructed with equal care. Velazquez painted the queen between
1631 and 1632. She was the daughter of King Henry IV of France and
Marie de Medici, and had married Philip IV in 1615, before he came
to the throne. The artist devoted the utmost ingenuity to painting
the queen's robes. Besides depicting all the material splendour
shown in this picture, he was interested, as so often in later
paintings, in the wealth of nuances to be conveyed by the play of
light on black fabrics, which he often exaggerated to produce
glittering reflections.
Art-lovers of his time also appreciated that effect in the works of
the Dutch painters Rembrandt (1606-1669) and Frans Hals
(1581/85-1666). It seems that this technique was something Velazquez
mastered only after his visit to Italy, although no direct model for
it can be identified. None of his pupils ever matched him in the
depiction of such phenomena.
|
| |

Velazquez
Queen Isabel, Standing
1631-32
Oil on canvas, 207 x 119 cm
Private collection
Velazquez painted this portrait over an older picture
of the queen
that he had executed towards the end of the 1620s.
|
| |
There can be no doubt that the presence of Rubens at court and
the example of his portraits greatly encouraged a more modern and
magnificent style of representation. The building on the outskirts
of Madrid of the castle of Buen Retiro, which the Count of Olivares
was anxious to have lavishly furnished, may be seen as expressing
this new demand for splendour, for ceremony of a luxurious and
artistically refined nature. However, it would be wrong to see
Velazquez as portraying courtly superficiality, self-satisfaction
and an addiction to magnificence. He is fully aware, of course, of
the social rank of his sitters; he knows the rules of etiquette,
which no one, least of all a court painter, may break. He knows that
it is his duty to employ his artistic genius in contributing to the
European reputation of the Spanish court.
But over and above such considerations - and it is here that his
enduring achievement lies - amidst all the magnificence he takes
note of his sitters' personalities. He makes statements without
passing moral judgements, certainly without condemning. He shows
faces that have, so to speak, become transparent to him through
their destinies; he shows the over-refined hands of a society of
aristocrats revealing itself to the gaze as if it had wearied in the
course of the centuries. The subtle beauty and nobility of these
princely portraits is so extraordinary that no later artist was ever
able to repeat it.
The long-awaited heir to the throne, Prince Baltasar Carlos, born on
17 October 1629, was his parents' pride and joy. While Velazquez was
in Rome he attended one of the glittering parties held in many
European cities to celebrate the child's birth. No sooner was he
back in Madrid than he was commissioned to paint the prince, now
sixteen months old, and in another portrait of the same subject he
shows the fair-haired little boy with a curious playmate .
|
|

Velazquez
Prince Baltasar Carlos with a Dwarf
1631
Oil on canvas, 128 x 102 cm
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston
The prince's face is modelled with gentle regularity,
whereas the paint is
applied to the head of the female dwarf with more irregular granulation.
This contrasting brushwork is often used by Velazquez in his pictures
to accentuate certain features of their content.
|
| |
Dressed in a magnificently embroidered ceremonial robe which
makes him into a miniature adult, the prince is standing on a
carpeted step beneath a draped wine-red curtain, holding a baton and
a dagger in his little hands. The steel gorget indicates his future
role as a military commander. His face, expressing all the charm of
his French mother in childish miniature, is turned towards another
child in the left foreground of the picture, and the child's
abnormally large head is looking back at him.
This figure is a dwarf, it is now thought probably a girl, one of
the human toys so popular at many European courts of the time. The
physically handicapped figure of the dwarf holds a silver rattle and
an apple in imitation of an orb and sceptre, and is acting the part
of a comic major-domo to the future little king. One wonders whether
their Majesties and the courtiers laughed at this picture and the
court painter's amusing idea.
In Spain (and other countries too) there was a long tradition of
including dwarfs in royal portraits as subordinate figures.
Basically, these deformed little creatures were merely attributes of
the royal dignity, part of the furnishings of the court and regarded
as neuter beings rather than fully human. Velazquez accepts this
distinction, yet ultimately he cancels it out. The little prince is
the focal point of the composition of the picture, and the
pigmentation also makes him its brilliant centre, an effect
emphasized by the gold braid on the dark material of his dress and
the carmine red of the sash.
|
| |
These strongly resonant tones contrast with the more muted
colouring of the dwarf's dark green dress, just as the delicate,
light and regular colouring of the prince's face contrasts with the
face of the dwarf girl, which has more effects of shadow and is
treated with greater artistic freedom. As a result, the prince
appears as the very incarnation of the blood royal, the nobler of
the two beings presented to our gaze, while the dwarf, with her
tousled dark blonde hair, is a subordinate and more animal creature.
Yet Velazquez seems to wish to show a more vital human nature in the
dwarf's face than in the countenance of the prince, which is already
dominated by the duties of his calling; the melancholy inherent in
the picturesque shadows says more about the dwarf girl's destiny
than the bright flesh tints of Baltasar Carlos's face can tell us
about his radiant, princely figure.
The phenomenal skill and impressively subtle psychology of this
painting is based on a wealth of nuances that can hardly be
described verbally: it is an interplay of harmonies and contrasts,
presenting effects of closeness and distance, of the sublime and the
human - and indeed of the endearingly childish. Velazquez expresses
all this not through complex allegorical allusions but solely in a
form where every detail has its meaning, in the magnificence of
colour that lends life to the whole, and in a composition of
inspired calm and dignity.
In 1630, at the instigation of the powerful prime minister Olivares,
building began on a new palace called Buen Retiro on the outskirts
of Madrid. It was to be a place where Philip and his court could
stay in surroundings more pleasant than those of the old Alcazar.
The decoration of the Great Hall, the Salon de Reinos (Hall of the
Kingdoms), was completed five years later. Most of the paintings
that ornamented the hall at the time are now in the Prado. There are
no extant pictures or drawings of what must once have been its
overwhelmingly effective interior design, but a poem by Manuel de
Gallegos entitled Silva topogrdphica, published in 1637, describes
the way in which the pictures were originally hung. A series of
equestrian portraits formed the brilliant focal point of an
exhibition of the glories of the Spanish monarchy.
|
| |
Philip IV on Horseback, painted around 1635, was of
course the most important item in this cycle. The king is shown here
in all his absolute might and power enjoying, as a contemporary
account puts it, a triumph such as few heroes of the past or present
could boast. Seventeenth-century Spanish horses, bred from crosses
with Arab stallions, were famous for their proud bearing and
temperamental beauty. Velazquez had the opportunity of observing
them daily in the royal stables or when the king put them through
their paces. The curvet represented the peak of equestrian skill,
the moment when the rider had to gather all his strength together,
and in this picture the king is making his mount curvet. Baroque art
also understood this pose as signifying the sovereignty with which a
monarch tamed the unruly power of the people or the animal savagery
of an enemy.
|
|

Velazquez
Philip IV on Horseback
1634-35
Oil on canvas, 304 x 317 cm
Museo del Prado, Madrid
|
| |

Velazquez
Philip IV on Horseback (detail)
1634-35
Oil on canvas
Museo del Prado, Madrid
|
| |

Velazquez
A White Horse
1634-35
Oil on canvas, 310 x 245 cm
Palacio Real, Madrid
|
| |

Velazquez
Philip IV
|
| |
In line with these ideas, and in a picture now lost, Rubens had
already shown Philip IV on horseback triumphing over his enemies.
Velazquez does not call upon the emotionally highly charged
background usual in Rubens, nor does he employ any grand allegorical
accessories. He also does not exaggerate the king's size by placing
him in front of a very low horizon with tiny soldiers in the middle
ground, as the Flemish master did in his portrait of Philip II.
While Velazquez uses a more restrained pictorial rhetoric than
Rubens, his royal horseman is livelier and more elegant than the
subject in another famous painting - Titian's Charles V. at
Muhlberg. The pure profile emphasizes the fine outline of man
and beast, and contrasts the rising movement of the horse with the
falling slope of an extensive and idealized landscape. Its
pigmentation, shot with beautiful shades of green and blue, is
reminiscent of sixteenth-century Flemish landscapes.
Philip IV s parents were also depicted in equestrian portraits hung
in the Salon de Reinos. However, the picture of Philip III on
Horseback is by an unknown painter, and was merely
over-painted by either Velazquez or an assistant between 1634 and
1635. It is the horse's head in particular that betrays the master's
hand. Art historians also assume that later corrections were also
made by the court painter and one of his workshop assistants to the
portrait of Philip's mother, Queen Margarita on Horseback.
|
| |
|

Titian
Charles V at Muhlberg
1548
|

Peter Rubens
Philip II on Horseback
1628
|
|
|
|
|

Velazquez
Philip III on Horseback
1634-35
Oil on canvas, 305 x 320 cm
Museo del Prado, Madrid
|
| |

Velazquez
Philip III on Horseback (detail)
1634-35
Oil on canvas
Museo del Prado, Madrid |