Baroque and Rococo

 







Diego Velazquez



 


 

     
 Baroque and Rococo Art Map
 
       
     Velazquez  - The Face of Spain
 
(Text by Norbert Woif)
 
 
     CONTENTS:  
    From Kitchen to Palace  
    The Psychology of Power  
    A Humane Equilibrium  (The Surrender of Breda)  
    Enigmas and Reflections - Riddles in Paint  (The Fable of Arachne, Las Meninas)  
    Picasso's studies  of  Las Meninas  
    Life and Work  
       
 



The Face of Spain


 

 

Enigmas and Reflections

- Riddles in Paint


 
 


Velazquez
Las Meninas - Self-Portrait
(detail)
1656-57
Oil on canvas
Museo del Prado, Madrid

 

 

Very likely none of these events would have been of any importance for modern students of his work if they had not, as has often been assumed, been reflected in the most famous of Velazquez' paintings, his undisputed masterpiece, described by the Neapolitan painter Luca Giordano (1634-1705) as the "theology of painting". This was his monumental work Las Meninas or The Royal Family, painted in 1656/57.
Las Meninas is one of the great problem pictures in the history of art. An almost infinite number of interpretations have now been proposed for the scene it shows, and countless painters, from the seventeenth century to Francisco de Goya, Edgar Degas and Edouard Manet, Max Liebermann and Franz von Stuck at a later date, with Salvador Dalf and Richard Hamilton in modern times, have felt inspired by this picture to offer their own versions and studies of it. Most notably, Pablo Picasso (1881-1973) vividly updated the picture in a fifty-eight part series. At first sight, however, Las Meninas seems to present no problems at all, and indeed appears perfectly straightforward in its sober geometry and good-humoured clarity.
 


Velazquez
Las Meninas or The Family of Philip IV
1656-57
Oil on canvas, 318 x 276 cm
Museo del Prado, Madrid

X-rays of this painting have shown that while Velazquez made many alterations to the composition while he was working on it,
there is nothing to indicate that he wished to depict himself as if looking at the Infanta
or anyone else in the group behind which he is standing.
 

 

It is set in a room in the Alcazar, equipped by Velazquez as a studio, and shows the heiress to the throne, the Infanta Margarita, with her court. Palomino names all those present. The queen's maid of honour, Dona Maria Agustina Sarmiento, one of the meninas, is kneeling at the Infanta's feet, handing her a jug of water. The other maid of honour, Dona Isabel de Velasco stands behind the princess, and beside her we see the grotesquely misshapen female dwarf Mari-Barbola and the male dwarf Nicolasico Pertusato; the latter, as Palomino points out, is placing his foot on the mastiff lying in front of the group to demonstrate the lethargic animal's good temper. Further back, almost swallowed up in the shadows, are a man described only as guardadamas - a guard or escort to the ladies -and the lady in waiting Dona Marcela de Ulloa.
Velazquez is standing with brush and palette in front of a tall canvas; we can see only the back of it. There are some large pictures hanging on the back wall of the room. Two of them were painted by Velazquez' son-in-law, Mazo, from models by Rubens, and show scenes from Ovid's Metamorphoses, one of them another version of the punishment of Arachne. The princess's parents, the king and queen, appear in a dark frame below these pictures, probably the glass of a mirror. To the right of the mirror, on a flight of steps leading up to a doorway and a brightly lit adjoining room, stands Jose Nieto, the queen's palace marshal.
 


Velazquez
Las Meninas
(detail)
1656-57
Oil on canvas
Museo del Prado, Madrid


Miniature Portraits (Philip IV of Spain and the Queen)

In the rear mirror, our attention drawn to it by the silhouetted courtier, we see a reflection of the king and queen. Whether it actually reflects them, or the painting Velazquez is working on, nobody knows for certain. Secure in their position, the royal pair can easily afford to become a mere reflection behind their child. Even as pale shadows, they can dominate, surely the subtlest of compliments.

 


Velazquez
Las Meninas
(detail)
1656-57
Oil on canvas
Museo del Prado, Madrid

Maria Sarmientio is giving her mistress, the Infanta Margarita, water in a bucaro, a red pottery jug, handing it to her on a tray. The children of Philip IV and his first wife Isabel de Bourbon were dead by the date of this painting, except for the eighteen-year-old Infanta Maria Teresa, who is not shown in this group. Philip married Mariana as his second wife in 1649. and at the time this picture was painted the Infanta Margarita, born on 12 July 1651, was her only child. The little princess's face is shown in an aura of almost other-worldly beauty such as Velazquez hardly achieved in any other work.
 

 


Velazquez
Las Meninas
(detail)
1656-57
Oil on canvas
Museo del Prado, Madrid

Court Life

There is a sense of life as actively lived, life held still for a passing moment - not a moment of special significance, however; merely one of thousands passing every hour, and this one lives on. The figures of the Infanta's entourage appear and recede in a vast cave of shadows. All have been identified as historical personages except for the man standing quietly on the right.
 



Jan van Eyck
The Marriage of Giovanni Arnolfini

(detail)
1434

The witnesses to the wedding of the Florentine merchant Arnolfini appear in the convex mirror on the back wall of the bedroom, including, as the inscription above the mirror confirms, the painter of the picture, Jan van Eyck.
 

There are several basic questions that have been asked again and again about this picture. What is Velazquez painting on the front of the canvas that is hidden from us? Where did he stand in order to paint the scene and himself in it? What is the source of the image in the mirror - that is, just where in the room must the royal couple have been standing for their reflection to appear? And finally, is there any significance in the fact that the red cross of the Order of Santiago is prominently applied to the artist's clothing?
It was long thought that Velazquez - whom the Impressionists claimed as a forerunner - was creating a picture without any metaphysical or speculative reference, and was merely recording a fleeting moment in permanent form, as if in a snapshot. According to this theory the subject was no more than an ordinary scene of palace life.

Their Majesties were sitting for the painter one day when the Infanta was called in to entertain them; she and her retinue are looking at the royal couple, directly visible only to them and to the painter, but seen half-length in the mirror by viewers of the picture, while the palace marshal is turning enquiringly back to the king and queen as he leaves the room.
A different hypothesis is put forward by art historians, who believe that intellect and keen perspicacity, as well as the artist's eye and hand, were involved in the painting of Las Meninas. They have studied the work for possible models, without coming to any particularly sensational conclusions. It has been possible only to establish that Velazquez knew the portrait of The Marriage of Giovanni Amolfini painted by Jan van Eyck (c. 1390-1441) in 1434, which was in Madrid at the time, and may well have picked up from it the idea of a mirror showing people who are not depicted in the room.

 

 

 


Velazquez
Las Meninas
(detail)
1656-57
Oil on canvas
Museo del Prado, Madrid
 

 

The question is, why would Velazquez have chosen to give an intellectualized rendering of his subject? One answer holds that the picture has a poetic rather than a documentary meaning. Velazquez has painted a portrait about the painting of a portrait, or as in Las Hilanderas, he has painted a picture about the making of pictures, and that is why he has placed himself in such a prominent position - to glorify his activity, his art, and himself as an independent creative artist. That is also, according to this theory, why Luca Giordano saw the composition as the "theology of painting", the highest form of intellectual or even philosophical concern with art.
The largest number of interpretations have been put forward for the mirror on the back wall, sometimes also thought to be a painted canvas. The theory above holds that the mirror, as a conventional attribute of Prudentia or Wisdom, indicates the wisdom of the royal couple and makes the whole picture the expression of elevated doctrines of virtue: it is a painted "mirror of princes". Velazquez did not show himself painting King Philip and his wife - double portraits were not usual in Spanish court painting of the time - but the royal reflection in the mirror, bathed in light, stands for the supreme and almost divine virtues of the monarchy. Scholars have also wondered whether the laws of optics actually allow the royal couple in front of Velazquez to be reflected - and whether the dimensions of the canvas on the easel are suitable for a double portrait. But what else can the painter be depicting on his canvas? The Infanta? The scene we ourselves see as we look at his picture? Or nothing at all? Countless investigations and mathematical studies of the perspective in Las Meninas by architects and engineers, art historians and theatrical experts, show that the vanishing-point of the composition is the open doorway in the background, which would also suggest that the source of the reflection in the mirror, in line with the laws of optics, is not directly opposite it but further left. The reflection of the royal couple in the mirror thus seems to be vanishing out of reach.
Much learned industry has also been applied to the question of location: in which room in the palace is this scene taking place? Although the Alcazar burned down in 1734, it has been possible to locate the site of the room in its historical ground plan. The reconstruction of the room itself, however, is a matter of controversy. In view of the nature of the picture, one recurrent problem is, of course, how a court painter's social position could allow him to depict himself so prominently in this picture, actually within the circle of the royal family, while the king and queen themselves are shown only indirectly.
Palomino says that the king thought particularly highly of Las Meninas when it was completed, so clearly Philip did not feel offended in any way by the picture, and indeed he probably gave the concept his blessing in advance. It is unthinkable that Velazquez would not have observed the requisite standards of etiquette in his painting. But there are widely divergent opinions of the way in which he expressed those standards, and speculations on the extent to which he may have been secretly undermining them. The glance that the painter turns on us from this picture certainly has nothing of the subservient courtier about it. He radiates pride and self-confidence - and is looking unwaveringly at the person opposite him, whoever that may be.
 


Velazquez
Las Meninas
(detail)
1656-57
Oil on canvas
Museo del Prado, Madrid
 

 


Velazquez
Las Meninas
(detail)
1656-57
Oil on canvas
Museo del Prado, Madrid