|
Portraits of Renaissance Humanists
|
|
see also:
Lucas Cranach
the Elder
|
Lucas Cranach the Elder:
Dr. Cuspinian and his Wife
|
|
 |
Lucas Cranach the Elder
Portrait of Dr. Johannes
Cuspinian
c. 1502
Oil on wood, 59 x 45 cm
Oscar Reinhardt Collection, Winterthur
|
Lucas Cranach the Elder
Portrait of Anna Cuspinian
c. 1502
Oil on wood, 59 x 45 cm
Oscar Reinhardt Collection, Winterthur
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Lucas Cranach the Elder
Dr. Cuspinian and his Wife
(detail)
The nine women appear to be the nine Muses, who were answerable,
according to Greek myth, to their leader Apollo, who has been identified
as the figure behind the tree at the left of the picture. Their element
is water. A balance is intended here to the fire behind Anna Cuspinian.
Perhaps this polarity symbolises the distinction between the genders:
according to Plutarch, fire was the male element, water the female.
|
Cranach painted this double portrait on the occasion of the
marriage of the Viennese humanist Johannes Cuspinian and his wife
Anna, daughter of an official of the Emperor. Cuspinian's
(1472-1529) real name was Spiepheimer, and he was originally from
Schwemfurt. He studied at Leipzig where he earned his laurels as a
poet, advancing, at the age of twenty-seven, to the position of
rector at the University of Vienna. He went on to hold various other
positions - Imperial Superintendent of the University from 1501, and
Dean of the Medical Faculty from 1501/02-eventually becoming
personal adviser and official historian at the court of Emperor
Maximilian I. In 1508, he edited Rufus' "Descriptio orbis "; he was
editor of Otto von Freising's "World Chronicle" (1515ff.), and
author of the "History of Roman Consuls up to Justinian" the
so-called "Consules" (almost completed by 1512), and of a renowned
book on Roman emperors ("De Caesaribus atque Imperatoribus Romanis",
Strasburg 1540). Like Conrad Peutinger, Conrad Celtis and others,
Cuspinian was undoubtedly one of the most versatile humanists of his
age. Initially, Cuspinian showed great sympathy for the theological
and political aims of the Reformation. Like many other humanists,
however, he distanced himself from the revolutionary movement after
the Peasants' War and reaffirmed his allegiance to the Catholic
Church.
|
|
 Lucas Cranach the Elder
Dr. Cuspinian and his Wife
(detail)
|
|
 Lucas Cranach the Elder
Dr. Cuspinian and his Wife
(detail)
The parrot, whose call was thought to be
"Avc", the Angelic Salutation, was considered
a Marian symbol: a sign of innocence and
purity.
 Lucas Cranach the Elder
Dr. Cuspinian and his Wife
(detail)
|
Lucas Cranach, Cuspinian's equal in years, had entered his
father's workshop and travelled through south Germany before meeting
with success in Vienna, where his work was particularly well
received in humanist circles. The humanists provided him with access
to the court, thus paving his way to the position of court painter
(in 1504 he went to Wittenberg to take up this office under
Frederick the Wise, Elector of Saxony).
Cranach composed these portraits as a pair. This is apparent in the
continuity of the landscape behind the elegantly dressed couple. The
trees at the edges of the painting, on the left and right of the
figures, are placed so that their branches form an arch, imparting
an air of grandeur to the sitters. The background was evidently
composed
with a distinct purpose in mind: nothing here is arbitrary. The
landscape is full of erudite symbolism, probably devised by
Cuspinian himself. In a well-informed study on this double portrait,
Dieter Koepplin has suggested that Cuspiman's frame of reference was
Pico della Mirandola's "Poetica Theologica", and Marsilio Ficmo's
doctrine of divine mysteries. He concludes that the various images
disguise hieroglyphic allusions to the cabbala. An example of this
is the artist's secretive mimmalisation of symbols, turning them
into "occult" figures. At the left of the picture, for example,
behind the tree, there is a minuscule figure with long, flowing
hair, whom Koepplin has convincingly identified as Phoebus, or
Apollo, since the figure is given a lyre and bow, the attributes of
this antique god. However, Apollo does not appear here as the god of
light, but rather as the opposite: as a "chtonian-mantic" god (Koepplin),
almost a demon. The writhing snake on the ground is a reference to
Asclepius, the god of medicine, who was a son of Apollo (cf. Ovid,
Metamorphoses 2, 602-620). The detail alludes to Cuspinian's medical
profession, as does the red beret on his head: "Medicus rubras fert
corpore vestes" (A doctor wears red clothing).
Another figure, one so tiny as to be almost invisible, stands on a
pinnacle of rock on the castle-topped mountain behind Cuspmian.
Shown in an antique gesture of adoration, the figure prays to a star
which Cranach has painted in real gold. The star is evidently
supposed to represent the Epiphany in the teachings of the early
Christian hymnic poet Clemens Prudentius. whose work demonstrably
had a profound effect on Cuspmian. Koepplin interprets the figure as
Orpheus, relating his position on the mountain to the Platonic
notion of "furor poeticus", and to the mountain-cult which often
accompanied the veneration of stars.
The nine women washing, bathing and carrying water in the middle
distance between Cuspmian and his wife, may be connected to Apollo,
too. They appear to be the nine Muses, who were answerable,
according to Greek myth, to their leader ("Musagetes") Apollo. Their
element is water, and a balance is evidently intended here to the
fire behind Anna Cuspinian. Perhaps this polarity symbolises the
distinction between the genders: according to Plutarch, fire was
male and water female, a notion adopted by Ficino. This theme seems
appropriate enough for a wedding painting. It is possible, however,
that the fire alludes to the burning bush (Exodus 3, 2), which was
used as a symbol for the Immaculate Conception during the late
Middle Ages because it "burned with fire" but "was not consumed",
just as Mary had remained a virgin during motherhood. The chastity
of the Virgin remained an ethical precept for married women for many
centuries. The motif of the parrot on the tree, given to Anna
Cuspinian as an attribute, is consistent with this precept. The call
of the bird was thought to be "Ave", the Angelic Salutation; since
the Middle Ages it had therefore been considered as a Marian symbol,
a sign of the innocence and purity associated with Mary.
What then is the significance of the other birds shown against the
darkening sky? Behind Cuspinian there is an owl with prey in its
talons being mobbed by a flock of birds; behind his wife on the
right, an eagle and a swan (on its back) are locked in combat. As a
humanist emblem, the owl was highly ambivalent, sometimes referring
to the goddess Athena's (or Minerva's) wisdom, sometimes to its
recalcitrant opposite: blind stupidity.
|
 Lucas Cranach the Elder
Dr. Cuspinian and his Wife
(detail)
The posture of Cuspinian's head may be intended to show the
humanist still pondering over a book he is holding in his hands.
However, its slightly raised position may indicate that he is
listening.
|
The motif of the struggle between swan and eagle can be elucidated
more clearly. It appears that Cuspinian and Cranach consulted Pliny
(X, 203) here. Pliny had been impressed by the swan's courage, since
it did not fear to do battle with an attacking eagle, and often
emerged victorious from the fight. It is not unlikely that Cuspinian
was using the motif of the flying bird - a signifcant cipher in the
"divinatory", or mantic, arts, in which the humanists liked to
dabble after the example of the Classics - to denote the principles
which he wished to govern his conduct: courage and wisdom, for
example.
It would be quite unsatisfactory merely to decipher the landscape
background symbol by symbol without seeing its significance as a
whole. Beyond a system of occult signs, the landscape allows a
generous framework for the couple's understanding of themselves,
providing a medium for the new cult of sensitivity and awareness of
nature which some humanists, notably Conrad Celtis, Joachim
Camerarius and others, were propagating in literary form through the
Classical topos of the pleasance, or pleasure-park.
Landscape acts as an echo-chamber for mental states, and, as such,
represents a macrocosm in which the individual, or microcosm, finds
his or her emotional world reflected. Perhaps this explains the
posture of Cuspinian's head. Of course, his pose may be intended to
show the humanist still pondering over a book, which he now holds
closed in front of him, his left hand - exposing two ringed fingers
- resting on its cover. However, his slightly raised head may
indicate that he is listening. The listening motif may refer to a
piece of Neoplatonic writing by Marsilio Ficino which was especially
popular in humanist circles: "It is through our ears that melodious
harmonies and rhythms enter our souls, admonishing and inspiring us
to lift our spirits forthwith, and, in the very depths of our being,
to ponder on such divine music."
|
|
|
 Lucas Cranach the Elder
Dr. Cuspinian and his Wife
(detail) |
|
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
see also:
Hans
Holbein
the Younger
|
Hans Holbein the Younger:
Erasmus of Rotterdam
|
|
|

Hans Holbein the Younger
Erasmus of Rotterdam
1523
|
|
|

Hans Holbein the Younger
Erasmus of Rotterdam
1523
|
|
|
Bought by Louis XIV from the Cologne banker Eberhard Jabach, the
painting initially entered the royal collection, from whence it
found its way to the Louvre.
Hans Holbein the Younger executed several portraits of Erasmus of
Rotterdam. His famous portrait of 1523,
now at Longford Castle, shows a three-quarters view of the humanist
in the narrow corner of a room, staring out in front of him with
tired eyes. To his left there is a richly ornamented pilaster,
crowned by a capital with the relief of a fabulous, mermaid-like
creature. Behind him, divided off by a curtain, is a recess with a
shelf and some books. Erasmus is standing at a table, his hands
resting on a book whose facing edge bears an inscription referring
to Heracles in slightly incorrect Greek. This is probably meant as a
humorous reference to the painstakingly detailed commentaries and
annotations that Erasmus supplied with his Latin translation of the
New Testament, or to his philological work in general.
|
|
|

Hans Holbein the Younger
Erasmus of Rotterdam
1523
|
|
|
Holbein's portrait (now at the Louvre) is similar to a portrait
executed by Quentin Massys in 1517, in that both show Erasmus
writing. Holbein's portrait is undoubtedly one of the greatest
sixteenth-century portraits of a humanist. The portrait consciously
reverts to an old-fashioned profile view. Whereas quattrocento
profile-view portraits often appeared conventional and stiff,
Holbein introduces an intensely dynamic psychological dimension by
showing the sitter actively engaged as a historical subject. The
silhouette of the great thinker is shown against a panelled interior
with a repeat-pattern tapestry. His large, dark coat with its brown,
turned-up cuffs and the black beret on his head provide a contrast
against which his face and hands stand out as the centres of his
intellectual activity. Erasmus is shown writing, his lowered,
seemingly introverted gaze on the written page, obscuring the pupils
of his eyes. The scholar is entirely engrossed and appears not to
notice the (imagined) spectator.
|
|
|

Quentin Massys
Erasmus of Rotterdam
1517
|
|
|
This was evidently the way in which Erasmus wanted to be seen: at
work, recording the movement of thought in writing. He probably sent
the likeness to his friend Thomas More, to whom, in 1511, during his
third visit to England, he had dedicated his satirical work "In
Praise of Folly" (Encomium Moriae), a pun on More's name.
Like his portrait of the French ambassadors, Holbein's portrait of
Erasmus contains a number of hidden allusions. One of the ornamental
animals on the tapestry can be identified as a griffin, a fabulous
beast described in ancient myths as having the talons of an eagle
and the body of a lion. Medieval and Renaissance Christian
hermeneutics saw these characteristics as metaphors for vigilance
(eagle) and courage (lion). At the same time, the
beast symbolised the ambivalent nature of Christ: the bird
represented divinity, the lion's body the human being. In Dante
Alighieri's "Purgatory" (29,106ff.) there is a description of a
griffin pulling the triumphal chariot of the church. On the eve of
the Peasants' War, with various religious groups either attacking or
championing him for their own cause, Erasmus used the hidden
allusion to Dante's "Divine Comedy" to demonstrate his allegiance to
the church. He remained loyal to the church all his life, despite
his sympathies for the Reformation and criticism of the Roman
Catholic clergy.
|
|
|

Hans Holbein the Younger
Sir Thomas More
Holbein painted several portraits of Sir Thomas More, who
was a close friend of Erasmus.
This was the preliminary drawing, executed in 1527, for a
painting of More's family
(for which there arc further drawings of the heads of individual
sitters).
After his return to Basle, Holbein delivered the drawing to
Erasmus,
who was most enthusiastic.
|

Hans Holbein the Younger
Hand Study of Erasmus of Rotterdam
Musee du Louvre, Paris
|

Albrecht Durer
Erasmus
1526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Hans Holbein the Younger
Erasmus of Rotterdam
1530
|
|
|
|

Hans Holbein the Younger
Sketch for the Portrait of Sir Thomas More
and his Family
1527
Pen, brush and ink over chalk on paper,
38.9 x 52.4cm
Basic, Offentliche Kunstsammlung, Kupfcrstichkabinett
|
|
 |