|
|
|
9 Postmodernism, the Return
of
Expression
|
|
|
The end of the twentieth century saw the gradual
breakdown of the hegemony of the International Style in the face of
challenges that arose as part of the
"postmodern" movement. The term "postmodern" is at
its heart a chronological
term that means simply "after modern" However, the term has been
complicated
by a variety of different and overlapping definitions that were
devised to
fit certain situations. One overarching idea of what
constitutes the "postmodern"
is that it rejects that which is "modern" For the purposes of
graphic
design, modern refers to the International Style, so
one should expect postmodern
design neither to look like nor to have the same conceptual basis as
the
work discussed in the previous chapter. The stylistic conventions of
postmodern
graphic design include mixing diverse type sizes and
weights, overprinting,
cluttered pages, deliberate "mistakes"
unpredictable historicist references, blurred
photographs, and even in some cases an embrace of general messi-ness—all
elements that reject the dogmatic rules of the International Style.
However, most scholars feel that the modern movement
did not end with the beginning of postmodernism, so that modernism
and postmodernism actually have
existed side by side, with the former losing ground to the latter
over the years. While
postmodernism cannot be confined to any one specific country or
even continent, this
chapter and the next will focus mainly on the American
and
British works that are considered to be at the heart of the
movement.
|
|
Psychedelic Posters
|
|
Despite decades of dominance, the International Style
was being
undermined as early as the 1960s. At that time a variety of young
designers began experimenting with an eclectic variety of styles.
Some graphic designers created work that was a self-conscious
reaction to the International Style, while other projects seem
to have grown organically out of the social circumstances of the
1960s and beyond. An example of the latter phenomenon
arose around 1965 in San
Francisco, where a critical mass of
young people focused their
energies on the burgeoning music
scene in
California.
This group of poster designers, many of them without
any formal an training, developed an exuberant, expressionist visual
language that neatly complemented the counterculture that was
developing among young people during that decade. As the name
implies, the "counterculture" refers to the overwhelming rejection,
or "countering" of conventional mores and social norms that characterized
many young people's beliefs in the 1960s. There was a
prevailing sense among young people that their parents' lifestyles
were stifling and outdated, and that it was necessary to resist
mainstream middle-class values that would lead to an inauthentic
existence. Profoundly idealistic, young people in Europe and the
United States nonetheless succeeded in forcing dramatic changes
in the way many people viewed the world.
Psychedelic drugs, particularly LSD, played a
significant role
in the formation of the counterculture. LSD had a profound effect
on the user's brain, causing visual and auditory hallucinations that
resulted in a dream-like "trip," which in turn was believed to lead
to more enlightened thinking and an expanded consciousness.
Especially in California, where drugs were legal until 1966, it
quickly became fashionable for artists and designers to adopt a
facsimile of a "psychedelic trip" in order to appeal to young
consumers. The resulting posters, many of which advertised rock
concerts, dramatically contrast with the clarity and legibility that
were the norm for graphic designs of all types.
A fine example of a psychedelic poster was created by
Wes
Wilson (b. 1937) in 1966 (fig. 9.1). This lithograph
seemingly contradicts its own reason for existing; why even make a
poster if the resulting text and image are so illegible as to be
unreadable?
The flame-like red lettering seems to zigzag back and forth across
the page, with the shape of each letter changing in order to fit
into the available space. The red letters seem to project from the
cool green background; this use of brilliant complementary colors
is a hallmark of the 1960s rock poster. In response to this
sacrifice
of legibility in the name of expressiveness, the concert promoter
Bill Graham (b. 1931) resorted to using asterisks that referred the
viewer of the poster to the bottom margin, where die specifics of
the concert were rewritten in legible type.
The psychedelic poster movement in San Francisco manifested another
key aspect of postmodernism: the embrace of
historicist styles. In 1965, the University of California at
Berkeley
had hosted exhibitions that highlighted early twentieth-century
Expressionist and Art Nouveau
styles, and these shows had a clear impact on posters from the
following years. For example, Wilson's Captain Beefhart
lithograph borrows the vertical format and flat stylized
ornament of Art Nouveau and combines it with the
undulating letters of the psychedelic. This sort of
borrowing need
not be so direct, as, for example, the Expressionist element in
general of the psychedelic movement probably was influenced by
historical posters. Postmodernists borrowed indiscriminately from
past styles without adopting the ideology or full aesthetic principles
of any given historical movement. Also, postmodernists often
mixed together historical references that did not
necessarily fit with one another.
Victor Moscoso (b. 1936), who taught at the San Francisco
Institute of Arts beginning in 1966, was one of the only psyche
delic designers with formal training in the visual arts, having
studied at Cooper Union and then at Yale with Josef Albers. In
the psychedelic poster scene of the 1960s, formal art training was
not necessarily considered something to be proud of, as it contra
dieted the "underground," anti-establishment vibe that dominated
the counterculture. Moscoso combined the exuberant hand-drawn
lettering of his psychedelic peers with more sophisticated techniques
such as photocollage in order to make images of
breathtaking originality. His 1967 Youngbloods integrates the
lettering
into the forms of a pair of dancing, naked hippies, whose gyrations
mimic the kinetic force of the abstract patterns that fill
out the image (fig. 9.2). Note how the words "Avalon
Ballroom."
which caption the image, seem to be expanding and flowing oft the
bottom of the poster, a technique that recalls the visual
hallucinations of LSD users. The vivid palette adds to the sense
of unreality, giving the image the aura of a spectral
vision.
Wilson and
Moscoso, along with Alton Kelly, Stanley Mouse
(b. 1940), and Richard Griffin, became known as the "Big Five"
of psychedelia. In 1967, they founded the Berkeley-Bonaparte agency
to market poster art, as they profited from yet another
"golden age" of the poster. Griffin's Flying Eyeball poster
of 1968
remains one of the most famous works produced by Berkeley-Bonaparte
(fig. 9.3). Publicizing a concert headlined by Jimi
Hendrix, it shows a monstrous image of a creature climbing
through a flaming hole burned into the poster. The
ligatures that connect the
lettering make them almost illegible. This type of
strange, inventive
supernatural imagery would become a mainstay for rock posters and
record album covers in the 1960s and 1970s.
|
|
|

|
|
|
9.1 Wes Wilson, Captain Beefhart & His Magic Band,
1966.
Poster. Color lithograph
|

|
Wes Wilson, Posters.
|

|
Wes Wilson, Posters.
|

|
Wes Wilson, Posters.
|
|
|

|
|
|
9.2 Victor Moscoso, Youngbloods, 1967. Poster.
Museum fur Gestaltung, Zurich. Poster Collection.
|

|
Victor Moscoso. Posters.
|

|
Victor Moscoso. Posters.
|

|
Victor Moscoso. Posters.
|
|
|

|
|
|
9.3 Richard Griffin, Flying Eyeball, 1968
|
|
British Psychedelics
|
|
The psychedelic movement was not confined to San
Francisco, as artists adopted the style elsewhere in the United
States and in
Europe. In the
United Kingdom, Michael English (b. 1940) and
Nigel Waymouth (b. 1941) pursued psychedelic graphics under the
name Hapshash and the Coloured Coat. A central aspect of
these designs is that psychedelic
posters for rock bands, such as one for the British group Pink Floyd
(fig. 9.4), sought to express
the same sense of drug-induced
dreamy reverie that was implicit
in the bands' music. This poster combines the fantastical elements
typical of the genre, seen in
the castle-like structure floating on
an island in the sky surrounded
by flying saucers, with salacious
details such as the nude
woman/angel who floats toward the viewer. The curvilinear rhythm of
her tendrils of hair suggests
a knowledge of the Art Nouveau posters produced by Alphonse Mucha .
In fact, the overall tone of the poster, particularly the ethereal
dreamlike quality of the landscape and the nude, harks back to the
Symbolist themes of the late nineteenth century. Of course, both An
Nouveau and psychedelic posters mainly served to publicize
entertainment aimed at the
young and daring—whether they were the denizens of
Montmartre's
nightclubs or followers of the London counterculture is almost
beside the point.
One of the climactic events of the British
psychedelic scene was 1967's Love Festival. Michael English created
a tantalizing
image to publicize the festival, and the poster was destined to
become one of the icons of the psychedelic era in Britain (fig.
9.5).
The dazzling palette combines with letters that seem to stream out
of the suggestive red lips, enticing the viewer with its aura
of sensuality and chaotic joy.
|
|
|

|
|
|
9.4 Hapshash and the Coloured Coat (Michael English and Nigel
Waymouth),
Pink Floyd, "CIA-UFO," designed and printed for Osiris
Agency Ltd.,
London, 1967. Poster. Screenprint.
|
|
|

|
|
|
9.5 Michael English.
Love Festival,
1967. Poster. Color screenprint.
|
|
Magazine and Album Design
|
|
Another high-profile publisher of rock graphics
beginning in the
1960s was Rolling Stone magazine. Founded by Jann Wenner (b.
1946) in San Francisco's warehouse district in 1967, Rolling
Stone
was the first publication to focus on the music industry as a core
part of modern culture. Before the magazine started publication,
rock music was still viewed as somewhat out of the mainstream and
not necessarily worthy of such detailed explications as
appeared in the pages of Rolling Stone. Wenner was also one
of the
first people to recognize that rock music intersected with broader
themes of social and political values, and these subjects were often
given significant space in the magazine, which became well known for
its investigative reporting on a variety of issues. At the
same time, Rolling Stone greatly amplified the burgeoning
culture
of celebrity that surrounded young musicians, and its artful photography
had a huge impact in creating the aura of glamour that
still surrounds
popular musicians, or rock stars, to this day.
The original Rolling Stone logo was itself a
product of the San
Francisco psychedelic music scene, as it was drawn by the poster
artist Richard Griffin (1944-1991). The fundamental
shapes of Griffin's letters are
still used at Rolling Stone to this day, although
the aggressively illegible
letterspacing and elaborate ornamental
curlicues were toned down in
later years. While the logo is
instantly recognizable, the most
striking aspect of Rolling Stone's
design has always been the
photography, which during the 1970s was mainly the work of the famed
artist Annie Leibovitz (b. 1949). Leibovitz's captivating images of
musicians, such as the
July 17,1975, cover featuring Mickjagger and Keith Richards of
the Rolling Stones
(fig. 9.6), imbued her subjects with a poise and
gravitas that belied their years
and reputations. Under art director
Tony Lane, the covers had been
simplified in the 1970s, with
large single photos often bleeding over the logo, so that the entire
composition resembled a
contemporary rock poster. It was not
until 1981 that
Rolling Stone covers started to appear without the insistent
framing device shown here, as the photos were finally reproduced in
full-bleed style on glossier paper.
In England,
Oz
magazine, first published in January 1967,
featured a wide range of graphic experiments that challenged the
notion that clarity must be a designer's primary
concern. Edited by Richard
Neville (b. 1941) and Martin Sharp (b. 1942), both originally from
Australia, where Oz had its first incarnation, the
magazine featured social and
political satire. Not just a lifestyle magazine, Oz took
unpopular positions characteristic of the counterculture,
including opposition to the war then raging in
Vietnam. A staunch promoter of
anti-establishment values, Oz was the most recognized product
of the so-called "underground
press." While Sharp was
responsible for the magazine's overall
design, the cover of issue no. 8
(January 1968; fig. 9.7) was devised by John Goodchild
and Virginia CliveSmith. The cover
is a compendium of mismatched
type and image overprinted one upon another. The topless young woman
in the background, presumably representative of "Playboy's dirty flics," seems to bear
no direct relationship to
the war cartoon in the foreground. The cartoon itself was
reproduced in brilliant fluorescent inks so that it appears to
almost jump right off of the page. This use of fragments of
popular culture outside their original context—in this
case, a cartoon from a
newspaper—is clearly part of the phenomenon that the art critic Lawrence Alloway termed "pop art." Pop artists
often used the strategy shown here, reproducing an emotionally
charged image from popular culture without commenting on it,
allowing viewers to come to their own conclusions. In 1971,
the editors of Oz were
brought up on obscenity charges, and their
trial became a cause celebre for proponents of the counterculture
ndudingjohn Lennon. Accused of "conspiracy to corrupt public
-orals,"
the three defendants were eventually acquitted.
The connection between graphic design and rock music
also played a significant role in pop art graphics, as the artists
Peter
Blake (b. 1932) and Richard Hamilton (1922-2005) both
designed album covers for the Beatles. Blake's cover
for the 1967
album Sergeant Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band,
perhaps one of the
most famous and influential rock albums ever
recorded, shows the band posed in uniforms made up of psychedelic
colored fabric
(f.9.8).
In an example of the postmodern love of pastiche, the
actual members of the band are shown surrounded both by a set
of wax figures of themselves borrowed from Madame Tussaud's
famous museum and a disparate group of celebrities that includes
both Marlene Dietrich and Edgar Allan Poe. The whole ensemble
is posed as if in a park, with the band's name spelled out in topiary.
At the time he made this design, Blake was a well-known
painter in the pop art movement. Once again, pop art
ideology sought to erase the
distinction between fine and commercial art,
so Blake considered his album
covers, for example, to be just as
significant as his paintings. This battle to collapse the hierarchy
between the fine and applied arts had been fought
intermittently
since the late nineteenth century. Despite the
efforts of generations of artists, there is still some semblance of
this hierarchical belief in place today, in the twenty-first
century.
|
|
|

|
|
|
9.6 Jann Wenner, Rolling Stone, July 17,
1975. Magazine cover.
|
|
|

|
|
|
9.7
Jon Goodchild and Virginia
dive-Smith,Oz,no.8,
Jan 1968. Magazine cover.
|
|
|

|
|
|
9.8 Peter Blake and Janna Hawortti,
Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club
Band,
1967. Album cover.
|
|