|
|
|
3 Sachplakat, The First World War,
and
Dada
|
|
see also:
Dadaism |
The Art Nouveau design styles discussed in Chapters 1 and 2
gradually
diminished in popularity between 1905 and 1914. This chapter traces
three
major reasons behind this decline. First, there was an inevitable
change in
fashion, as the once "New Art" began to look dated. Designers and
members of
the public who had once been captivated by its dense ornament found
themselves wanting less, not
more. Second, the expanding customer base for
graphic designers included clients with different needs
from those of the
entertainment industry that dominated the Art Nouveau period. Early
in the
twentieth century, more and more companies that had previously
eschewed
graphic design were feeling the need to present a burnished image
and attractive products to consumers. Third, the onset of war
between the major
European powers in 1914 focused designers work on furthering
nationalist
causes. The First World War would have a lasting impact on graphic
design
and its patrons. Later in the chapter, an art movement spawned in
reaction
to the war, "Dada," introduces a number of new design principles
that had
broad consequences for graphic design later in the twentieth
century.
|
|
Sachplakat
in Germany
|
|
The first
decisive blow against the dominant Art Nouveau styles
was struck not
by an established artist, but by an amateur designer
named Lucian Bernhard (1883-1972).
While the details of his early life are unclear, it is known that Bernhard was born in Stuttgart
to a family that did not support his artistic aspirations. His name
at birth was Emil Kahn. In his teens, Bernhard briefly attended an
school in Munich, where he also saw an international
selection of An Nouveau posters that included everything from the
most ornamental work by Alphonse Mucha to the more simplified
posters of the Beggarstaff Brothers. In 1903, Bernhard settled in
Berlin, seemingly without any real prospects as an artist—or
as a poet, another field that he reportedly dabbled in
at this time.
|
|
Lucian Bernhard and the Priester Breakthrough
|
|
It was at some
point while in Berlin that Emil Kahn became
Lucian
Bernhard, perhaps as a response to conflict with his father,
who may have disowned him at this time,
or in an attempt to
assimilate more
effectively into a German society rife with anti-Semitism by
effacing the Jewish ancestry recognizable in his surname. Whatever
the case, the newly minted Bernhard decided
to enter a
poster competition for the Priester match company. This type of
contest was quite common at the time, as there was
no standardized
profession of graphic design or established community
of professionals to which clients could naturally turn.
Bernhard's first
draft for his entry showed a smoking cigar astride
an ashtray next
to a pair of matches. These elements rested on
a checkered
tablecloth. The most dramatic element of the composition
was the smoke from the cigar, which, replicating Jugendstil
cliche,
transformed midstream into a bevy of beautiful young
dancing women.
Bernhard used a flat brown background derived from his knowledge of
the Beggarstaffs and Japonisme. Floating
in the space
above the table was the company's name, Priester. Overall, the
poster displayed the influence of both the Japanese style and the
festive atmosphere favored by many Art Nouveau
designers.
As Bernhard
later told the story, he next showed the maquette,
or model, of the poster to an acquaintance, who mistook it
for an advertisement for cigars.
This was a natural assumption,
because the smoke from the cigar
was the only element of the
poster that
showed a dramatic flourish. Recognizing his mistake,
Bernhard began
a process of "addition by subtraction," gradually
removing any
element that could possibly "compete" with the
matches for the
viewer's attention (fig. 3.1). For his final draft,
Bernhard left
only the two red matches, the company name in
block letters,
and the neutral colored background. It is not clear,
although it
seems likely considering the harmonious balance of
the final image,
whether Bernhard rescaled the matches when he created this new,
simpler composition, or whether his final draft was strictly a case
of the elimination of the superfluous cigar, tablecloth, etc.
The story
does not end with Bernhard's submission of the
poster to Priester's judges. In an even more dramatic twist, his
image was reported to have been
immediately thrown in the trash by the judges, only to be rescued by
Ernst Growald, an executive for the advertising agency Hollerbaum &
Schmidt, which was
overseeing the competition. Growald, who would become an
important client-patron of Bernhard in subsequent years, is said
to have glanced in the garbage
can and exclaimed, "This is my first
prize! This is genius!" and a new
career for Bernhard as well as a
revolutionary change in the
design of German posters had begun.
Why exactly was
the image for Priester matches so extraordinary?
Looking back at Chapter 1, it would seem that both
Leonetto
Cappiello in Paris and the Beggarstaff Brothers in London, to give
just two examples, had used similar, simplified
designs that
drew on Japonisme. While it is arguable that Bernhard has taken
these earlier attempts at reductive compositions
to a new extreme, the real innovation in the Priester poster
lies in its tone. The
Beggarstaffs' poster for Harper's uses an unrelated image of a Beefeater, one that had actually been intended to
publicize a completely different product, in an attempt to add a
theatrical flourish to the advertisement. Similarly, Cappiello's
poster for Maurin absinthe
features a rather bizarre allegorical figure
of a green demon in order to enliven its message. Also, both
these posters, and especially
Cappiello's, are quite lively from a
visual
standpoint. In stark contrast, Bernhard's poster displays
only the two matches and the company's
name, and it does so while
completely eschewing any flair, allegorical flourish, or
kinetic colorism. It is this
simple communication of a declarative
message, addressing the viewer
forthrightly as if to say, "Here is
the product, this is its name,"
that makes Bernhard's work stand apart. It is this clarity that
earned this style of poster the name
Sachplakat,
translatable roughly as "object-poster." In sum, Sachplakflt
designs such as this one looked both to the past,
showing a strong Japanese
influence, and to the future, because
their radical simplification and
blunt messages later became a key
part of modern advertising.
Because Bernhard
was vague, even deliberately obtuse, when
it came to
divulging the details of his life and career, historians are
unsure of the
credibility of this famous story of the casual genesis
of a poster
that revolutionized graphic design. Whether or not the
story is
apocryphal is in some ways beside the point; what is more
important is the
fact that the story was considered worth telling at all. Up to this
point in history, the artistic decisions that went into the creation
of a commercial poster were not really believed to be
worth thinking
about or telling stories about. The fact that people cared enough to
tell and retell this anecdote says more about the rising status of
graphic design than do the details of the episode themselves. There
is an analogy here with the history of painting and painters'
struggle to be taken seriously as an important
profession. In the fifteenth and
sixteenth centuries, numerous
anecdotes of dubious credibility about painters' lives began to be
told—that Leonardo da Vinci had died in the arms of the
French king, for example—and
these narratives represented part of the struggle for painters to be
taken seriously, a struggle that graphic
designers faced early in the 1900s.
The Sachplakflt style needs to be understood in terms of the
historical dominance of Art Nouveau in 1905. Its radical simplification
did not exist in a vacuum, but represents a direct rejection
of the ornamental complexity of Art
Nouveau. The relationship between
the Sachplakat and Art Nouveau is therefore one that
scholars call "dialogical,"
meaning that the style came about as
part of a dialogue, in this case
with the Art Nouveau style. The
Sachplakat
style offered an alternative to corporate clients such as
Priester, who were dismayed by
the obvious "airiness" of Art Nouveau graphics, whose complexity of
style they felt could obscure their product. It could be argued that
an exceedingly deorative poster such as those designed by Mucha
actually competed with
the product it was supposed to be selling, so that it was unclear
what the poster was really about—the product or the
poster itself? If the prospective
consumer is likely only to glimpse
the poster while passing through
the city streets, it is necessary
that the product's basic function
and name be instantly recognizable. In contrast, the product
being proffered in many Art
Nouveau posters had to be aggressively sought out by the viewer
after somewhat longer contemplation. Furthermore, the Art
Nouveau style's alliance with the
Symbolist and Aesthetic movements of the 1890s could well
have tainted the movement with the "decadent" label, something that purveyors of consumer
goods wanted to avoid,
especially in aesthetically conservative
countries such as Germany or the
United States.
Bernhard was
highly sought after following his success in the
Priester
competition, and he established himself, and the
Sachplakflt
style, as the advertising mainstay for many German
companies. In
1906, he opened his own firm, which eventually employed more than
twenty graphic designers. In 1907, he
became a founding member
of the Deutscher Werkbund, an honor indicative of the strength of
his reputation. The relationship
with Growald and Hollerbaum & Schmidt served as a continuous source
of important corporate commissions. Fine examples from the prewar
period include this poster for Bosch
sparkplugs from 1913 (fig.
3.2), in which a bold juxtaposition of
orange and blue creates a
striking background for the neutral
color of the sparkplug. The
rectangular box enclosing the name of
the company plays off the irregular starburst that
represents the
electric spark.
|

|

|
3.1 Lucian Bernhard, Priester Matches,
1905
|
3.2 Lucian Bernhard, Bosch, 1914.
Lithograph
|
|
|
The Sachplakat Phenomenon
|
|
The
owners of the advertising and lithography firm of
Hollerbaum & Schmidt immediately
attached themselves to both
Bernhard and the overall
Sachplakflt phenomenon, signing several
additional
designers to exclusive contracts. Included in this grouping,
sometimes called "The Six," was the Viennese artist Julius
Klinger (1876-1950), whose poster for
the Mohring Chandelier Company
of 1909 is one of the icons of Sachplakat style (fig.
3.3). Klinger had trained in Vienna at a technical
institute, where he later became
a magazine illustrator. His early works show the
influence of the curvilinear Art
Nouveau promoted by the Vienna Secession movement. After moving to
Berlin, he came under the influence of first the Beggarstaffs and
then the new style initiated by Bernhard. The Mohring poster
displays its product alone and without any setting, eschewing the
narrative devices that drive so
many advertising messages.
The striking advertisements by Hans Rudi Erdt (1883-1918)
for Hollerbaum & Schmidt include one for Opel cars completed
in 1911
(fig. 3.4). In a variation on the style, Erdt does not display
the product, a type of
automobile, but the consumer—in this
case, the distinguished-looking
face of a man with driving goggles
perched on his head. Like the
Beefeater from the Beggarstaffs'
portfolio, the contour is broken
in several places and the man's collar flows into the flat field of
green. The closest thing to a representation of a car is the wheel
shape of the outlined "O" in
Opel, which serves as a metonymic
device—that is to say, it
stands for the entire car, just as the figure is intended to project the
confident feeling of owning one. In the previous year, Opel
had introduced its first racing car, in an attempt to add glamour to
its stock production line. Erdt's poster captures this element
of prestige associated with the brand, which stands
in contrast to
the less emotional message of Bernhaxd's Bosch poster.
|
|
|

|
|
|
3.3 Julius Klinger, Poster, Mohring Chandelier
Factory. 1909. Museum fur Kunst und Gewerbe, Hamburg.
|
|
|

|
|
|
Julius Klinger,
Salome, 1909
|
|
|

|
|
|
3.4 Hans Rudi Erdt, Opel, 1911. Poster
Deutsches Histonsches Museum, Berlin
|
|
Ludwig Hohlwein
|
|
Aside from
Bernhard, the most successful representative of the
Sacbplakat
style was the German designer Ludwig Hohlwein
(1874-1949). An architect by training,
Hohlwein lived during the 1890s
in Munich, where he participated in the Vereinigte
Werkstatten fur Kunst im Handwerk ("United Workshops for
Art and Crafts"). This
organization, dedicated to Arts and Crafts
principles and the creation of
finely crafted goods, also promoted the art of the poster.
The United Workshops' output in graphic
design tended toward strong
figurative elements, which can be
seen in Hohlwein's poster
publicizing "Richard Strauss-Week"
(1910; fig. 3.5).
Mixing abstraction and
three-dimensional modeling,
Hohlwein placed a fairly detailed figure in a space that lacks an
identifiable horizon line defining it. The design is also abstract
in its stark orthogonal
framework, through which the vertical
figure and her staff are linked
together by horizontal lines of text.
In 1911,
Hohlwein established himself in Berlin as a graphic designer in the
Sacbplakat mode. In posters for a men's clothing
company,
Hermann Scherrer, Hohlwein displayed his penchant
for Beggarstaff-like
reductiveness (fig. 3.6). However, Hohlwein
has a tendency
to maintain more volumetric rendering of form
in pans of the image, an element of the
style he had practiced in Munich, than Bernhard or the others.
Hohlwein's hybrid style mixes the simplicity of the Sacbplakat, including its restriction
in the amount of text to the name of the company, or product,
and an occasional short copy line
contained a rectangular block, with a projection of upper-class
elegance and refinement not typical of the style. Here, the
well-bred dog and riding accessories are suggestive
of an affluent lifestyle. Additionally, his posters often show
a flair for self-conscious
design, particularly vivid color and abstract patterning,
which distinguishes them from the other
artists who pursued the
Sacbplakat style. In this example, the black
and white checkered pattern of
the man's riding outfit creates a two-dimensional plane that
is in tension with the surrounding,
more three-dimensional looking, elements.
A poster that
Hohlwein produced for the Marco Polo Tee
company frames the product in an exotic
manner more akin to Art Nouveau
posters than to Sacbplakat. The image works by
putting the viewer in the
position of an affluent consumer who is being served the product.
The poster features a Japanese woman,
presumably a geisha, a trained
professional who administers to the
needs of upper-class men
(fig. 3.7). Hohlwein has self-consciously
imitated the style and subject
matter of Japanese woodblock
prints of the Bijin-ga variety, which display beautiful women,
in the manner in which he
overlays flat planes with different patterns. The artist's initials,
"LH," are inscribed into the yellow pattern that adorns her
shoulder. Of course, the yellow rests on a violet field, reproducing
a harmonious juxtaposition of complementary colors. Another dramatic
passage involves the back of
her head, where her black coif
blends seamlessly into the abstract
background pattern. Other
posters for Marco Polo by Hohlwein
depicted African servants. For
twenty-first-century eyes, it is hard
to view posters
such as these outside the context of the brutal
European
conquest of Africa, which was a major source of
Europe's wealth at the time. Coming at
the height of Germany's colonial
empire, the image of servile foreigners would satisfy the viewer
with a reminder that their country's reach stretched around
the globe.
|

|
3.5 Ludwig Hohlwein, Richard Strauss-Woche
(Richard Strauss-Week), 1910. Poster.
|
3.6 Ludwig Hohlwein, Hermann Scherrer,
1911. Poster. Lithograph.
|
3.7 Ludwig Hohlwein,
Marco Polo Tee 2, 1912.
Poster.
|
|
|
Posters and Typography
|
|
The most
important journal devoted to graphic design in Berlin
was founded by a
dentist and poster collector named Hans Josef
Sachs. In 1905,
Sachs had spurred on the creation of the Verein
der
Plakatfreunde ("Association of Friends of the Poster"), a
promotional organization. Sachs recruited Bernhard to act as
artistic
consultant to
the association, and to design its first logotype. In
1910, Sachs
desired to publish a journal devoted to his passion,
and Das
Plakat (1910-21) was born. Bernhard designed a poster
to publicize
the journal in 1916, in which a woman is shown
closely
examining a poster on exhibition (fig. 3.8). The image bears
a striking resemblance to the imprimatur that Jules Cheret
had created for
the Les Mahres de Affiche series, an emblem with
which Bernhard
was surely familiar. In Bernhard's poster, the
form of the
woman is no more volumetric than the poster affixed to the wall.
Neither the figure nor the poster is attached
to the ground plane. The only
indication of a ground is the
rectangular bar centered under the figure; it serves a dual purpose,
as a ground line and as a
visual demarcation between the image and the text under it. Perhaps
indicative of his high status as a graphic designer a decade after
the Priester contest, is the manner
in which Bernhard uses his name
as a compositional device to balance the rectangle formed by
the poster frame in the upper left. The blocklike, symmetrical form and simplified sans serif
lettering of the name,
"Bernhard," contrast with the flowing faux blackletter of the
journal's title at the base of the image.
In terms of circulation, Das
Plakat was the most successful poster journal ever
produced in Europe, peaking at 5,000 copies for
an issue published in 1918, an incredible number for such a
specialized magazine.
During the early
twentieth century, there was an ongoing dispute
as to whether or not Germans should rely on the classic roman types
that prevailed in the rest of Europe, or maintain their
national
tradition of blackletter, especially schwabacher and fraktur,
the two sixteenth-century scripts that had Germanic origins. The
German authorities seemed to be undecided as to whether or not to
maintain a style of type that separated German publications from
those of most of the rest of Europe. At the start of the century,
newspapers and mainstream literature were all printed in fraktur,
while the school system taught young people to write in gothic
script. At the same time, a wealth of publications in Germany,
especially those that wanted to look modern to the
reader, embraced
the roman tradition. In 1911, the German parliament
had considered forbidding the use of blackletter scripts in state
schools and government documents. This "Dispute of the Scripts" had
resulted in the defeat of the new legislation, and
Germany had continued on a path of dual
roman and blackletter writing styles, sometimes representing separate spheres of activity,
sometimes
published side-by-side in official documents.
Several
typefaces that attempted to integrate elements of both traditions
are symptomatic of this dilemma. In fact, the Art Nouveau types
designed by Peter Behrens and discussed in
Chapter 2 functioned by transforming
the broken curves of fraktur into
curvilinear decorative elements. In 1914, Friedrich Bauer
(1863-1943) designed an
excellent hybrid type called Hamburger
Druckschrift. Bauer's effort represents an attempt to reconcile this
conflict in a visual
sense by including formal elements from both traditions. Hamburger
Druckschrift has a calligraphic structure that is recognizably tied
to blacklctter, but all the dramatic flourishes,
broken curves, rhomboid and diamond terminals have been suppressed.
Also, some of the least legible characters to readers
used to roman type have been
simplified, such as the "K," "S," and
"X." The type appears light in
comparison to the dense color of most blackletters, and has taken on
the wide proportions and open letter forms of roman type.
The
Sachplakat poster artists themselves clearly sided with the
German industries that wanted a
modern look to their advertisements,
and so embraced roman lettering. The Sachplakat designers
contributed to roman
typography in Germany, especially after their popularity caused a
whole host of designers to copy the plain, block letter style of
their hand-drawn posters. In 1912, Frankfurt's Flinsch foundry
published Bernhard Antiqua, a typeface
based on the lettering in Bernhard's original Priester matches
poster (fig. 3.9). Originally produced for the Linotype
machine, this bold roman face preserves some of the idiosyncratic
letter-forms of Bernhard's hand-drawn work, such as the lower-case
"e" that drops below the
baseline. After the First World War broke
out in August 1914, the pool of
Sachplakat designers grouped in
Berlin around Hollerbaum &
Schmidt found new work, as they shifted from the promotion of
industry to the needs of the
German war machine.
|
|
|

|
|
|
3.8 Lucian Bernhard, Das Plakat, 1916.
Poster.
|
|
|

|
|
|
3.9 Lucian Bernhard, Bernhard Antiqua Typeface, 1912.
|
|
The First World War
|
|
On June
28, 1914, the Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand,
who was visiting Sarajevo, was
assassinated by Gavrilo Princip,
a Serbian nationalist who
resented the Austro-Hungarian
Empire's domination of the Balkan
states. Because of a series
of alliances and security guarantees among the major powers in
Europe, the initial conflict between Austria-Hungary and the
Serbians precipitated by the assassination quickly led to a much
broader conflict. The war pined
the Allies—Britain, France,
Russia, Italy, and the United
States (after 1917)—against the
Central Powers—Austria-Hungary,
Germany, and Turkey. One of the most portentous events of the
twentieth century, the "Great War" resulted in the collapse of four
empires, including those in Austria-Hungary, Germany, and Russia,
and set the stage for continuing European conflict throughout
the 1920s and 1930s. While the precise number of casualties from the war is even today
uncertain, scholars estimate
that as many as 20 million people
were killed and 33 million
wounded. The war's vast scale and use of civilian-soldiers had a
greater impact on European populations
than earlier European conflicts,
which had been fought by small
professional armies.
In terms of the
use of graphic design, the First World War created
a pressing need
to influence the views of potential recruits and
financial
backers, as well as to garner the general support of the
population to maintain backing for a
conflict that, when it broke out in the summer of 1914, had been
expected to end "by Christmas."
It is important to remember that journalists' access to the war was
essentially non-existent, so citizens of the belligerent nations
were often completely ignorant of the scope of the horror at
the front. As the war dragged on and casualties mounted into
the many millions, governments
became even less forthcoming, refusing to publish statistics
detailing the number of missing, dead, and wounded.
The one consistent form of government communication to its citizens
was through the posters that were slathered on hoardings across the
cities of Europe. Of course, the content and style of
these posters
were tightly controlled by government agencies, so that the messages
therein were just as likely to mislead viewers as to enlighten them.
Many of the posters discussed here were in fact
collaborations
of necessity, not choice, as the government officials
in charge of
publicity often wrote the text themselves after commissioning the
image from an artist. At other times, old images
were recycled
with new text as the occasion demanded.
Thus, the First World War led to an enormous acceleration in
the production of posters as different governments sought to rally
their
own citizens to support the war effort. When the war began,
Britain had the
smallest army of all of the European powers, totaling
only about 160,000. Because theirs was the only country in
the conflict
that lacked a military draft, the British authorities had
the greatest
need to encourage volunteers. While enthusiasm for the war ran high
early in the conflict, an initial onslaught of volunteers
quickly dried up as casualties mounted. During the
eighteen months before a draft
was instituted early in 1916, the British government relied heavily
on posters to encourage young men to join the fighting. This
recruitment need resulted in hundreds of individual posters, with
production totals numbering in
the millions. The production of posters was centralized in the hands
of the Parliamentary Recruiting Committee (PRC), a branch of the War
Office. The PRC's campaign was apparently successful, as over 2.5
million British men joined the military
between August 1914 and January
1916. However, those numbers were not enough to feed the war
machine on the front and so
conscription became essential, while poster designers turned to
other themes. The precise role that graphic design played in fueling
recruitment is essentially unknowable, although anecdotal evidence
suggests that many posters strongly resonated with the
British citizenry.
Stylistically,
there was an abrupt halt to the proliferation of decorative Art
Nouveau, Japonisme, and other abstract styles,
along with a new commitment to a more
conventional type of realistic representation. There are two major reasons for this
trend; first, the conservative
taste of the members of the PRC, who felt that more traditional,
natural styles had a greater appeal
for the largest cross-section of
the population; and second, the fact
that the majority of posters
were designed in-house by commercial lithography firms that
used their own printers in both design
and production
roles. Even as styles regressed, designers developed
new sophistication in manipulating the population through
subject matter.
For these reasons, the First World War paradoxically
diminished the status of graphic design as an art form. The
war poster
became in most cases strictly a vehicle for government
propaganda,
while the three-decades-long effort by designers to enhance the
artistic qualities of the poster fell by the wayside.
Among the most influential types of posters designed to bolster
British recruitment were those that used a direct appeal, bordering
on a command, from a respected military leader. The
most memorable
of this group was a 1914 poster by Alfred Leete
(1882-1933)
depicting Lord Kitchener (1850-1916), a national
icon and the
Secretary of State for War, who oversaw the recruitment drive
(fig. 3.10). Leete made the original design for the
September 1914
cover of the monthly magazine London Opinion,
then remade it as a poster at the
behest of the PRC. While the
original version of the poster was drawn by hand, a second poster
was unique among British designs in that it used a photograph for
its portrait of Lord Kitchener.
Lord Kitchener
was so famous that it was unnecessary to record his name; rather,
his picture is integrated into the middle
of the text,
"Britons, [Lord Kitchener] Wants You." Kitchener's
dramatically
foreshortened right arm ends in his pointed index
finger, a
finger that complements the semblance of direct eye contact
between him and the potential recruit. This dramatic gesture
became the
cornerstone of an entire genre of appeal, the "pointing
poster." The
typography in this poster is rather undistinguished,
as an eclectic
variety of bold display type delivers its message, if
nothing more.
Leete was not a graphic designer per se, but rather
an illustrator
and cartoonist for Punch magazine. The widespread success of
this poster of Kitchener leads invariably to a number
of pointed
questions. How important is graphic design to the creation of an
effective poster? If this rather rudimentary design and
typography were
successful, is it by definition a "good" poster?
The "pointing"
design was widely copied, and variations of it appeared almost
immediately. A second poster by Leete features
John Bull, a
personification of England who had been invented in
the early
eighteenth century, shown in his typical dress of tailcoat,
breeches, and
Union Jack vest (fig. 3.11). This powerful country
squire
addresses the viewer with a stern glare and a damning
admonition
framed as a question, "Is it You?" The moral reproach
explicit in the
question is as bold as the comportment of Bull
himself. Partly
because of a long tradition of shielding the general
population from
the horrors of war, and partly to keep up morale,
there is rarely
any actual fighting on display in recruitment
posters. The
glimpse of a small conflagration behind the line of dutiful soldiers
is only minimally suggestive of a conflict that
included days
such as July 1, 1916, on which 19,000 British soldiers
were killed at the Somme. Years such as 1916, when this
poster
appeared, caused the infantryman and poet Siegfried
Sassoon (1886-1967) to write "What in
earlier days had been drafts of
volunteers were now droves of victims."
A second genre
of British war poster stressed the comradeship and excitement of
life as a soldier, depicting the war as something
akin to a heroic
adventure. Confronted in a poster by a train filled
with
fresh-faced recruits pointing at them in a friendlier fashion than
Lord Kitchener or John Bull, young men read, "There's
Room for You" and felt that they did
not want to miss out on the
journey of a lifetime (fig. 3.12). Posters such as At the
front (1915) display a subsequent moment, when the trip
to the front has landed the new recruit into the midst of an adventure; the kinetic
action of mounted troops under fire in a blaze of color is truly
seductive (fig. 3.13).
The rearing horse in the foreground is being
brought under control by a
cavalryman, suggesting the polished professionalism of troops in the
army. Inspired perhaps by the scenes of lion hunts made popular by
the French Romantic painter Eugene Delacroix (1798-1863),
this dramatic image presents the
war in the most romantic of terms. Both these posters feature a
composition through which the central image functions like a window
into another world, an exciting one of color and comradeship. The
poster contrasts that romantic vision with the flat, neutral
color of the surrounding border and lettering.
In this manner, the lack of flair shown in the design of the border
and type works to enhance the message, in so much as it stands in
for the drab day-to-day existence of young men who
resist the call to arms.
|

|

|
3.10 Alfred Leete, Britons, (Lord Kitchener)
Wants You, 1914. Poster. Photolithograph and letterpress.
|
3.11 Alfred Leete. Who's Absent? Is It You?,
1914. Poster.
Lithograph on paper.
|
|

|

|
3.12 Anonymous, There's Room for You. Enlist
To-Day, 1916. Poster. Lithograph
on paper. Imperial War Museum, London.
|
3.13 Anonymous, At the Front!, 1915.
Poster.
Lithograph on paper.
Imperial War Museum, London.
|
|
|
Emasculating Messages
|
|
For those
recruits who proved immune to either the direct appeal
of John Bull or
the sense of romantic adventure offered by imaginary comrades,
British recruiters developed an even more caustic
weapon—emasculation. Emasculation, the questioning or weakening
of a man's virility, was the most potent psychological attack
that any
designer could muster. In 1915, Edward Kealey initiated
the theme with
his poster Women of Britain Say "Go!"—which
sought to
persuade women to pressure their husbands into joining
the war effort
(fig. 3.14). Kealey's message makes use of the traditional
Victorian notion of "separate spheres," through which each
gender was thought to have its own
natural environment— women in
the home and men in public life. Kealey displays this concept in a
literal fashion, as the mother and children are seemingly embraced
by the doorway of their home as the soldiers
placed across a balustrade march
off as part of their male role.
The theme of emasculation
centers on the little boy who clutches
at his sister's skin, suggesting
that men who stay home are akin to
preadolescent children clutching
their mommies. The illustration
is again the heart and soul of
the poster, as the lettering does little more than enunciate
the theme. This retrograde style has
retreated from the advanced
composition of sophisticated lithographs
from the 1890s by artists such as the Beggarstaffs or
Aubrey
Beardsley.
The amateur
genesis of so many British war posters is
exemplified by
the story behind the creation of the most famous
picture of
emasculation ever made, Daddy, What did you do in the
Great War?
(fig. 3.15)
As his son Paul
later recounted, the printer
Arthur Gunn asked himself this question one evening in 1915 at
home. Recognizing effective
emotional blackmail when he saw it, Gunn suggested to his friend,
the children's book illustrator Savile
Lumley, that it could form the kernel of an effective recruiting poster.
In order to heighten the impact of the question, Lumley,
author of comics such as The
Boy's Own Paper, transformed the interlocutor from Paul
Gunn into a tittle girl sitting on her
father's lap. In this image the
little boy at the man's feet enhances
the moral reproach inherent in
the scene, as he plays with toy soldiers,
signaling that even at such a young age he has more
masculine instincts than his
father. Lumley's poster, especially the shamefaced visage of the
emasculated patriarch, is a masterpiece
of bullying propaganda, while
its completely uninspiring design does nothing to take away from
such blunt condemnation. As
stated above,
the effectiveness of this imagery is far from certain, and the
extreme manipulation of the viewer was greeted cynically
by some
contemporary viewers. However, it remained the most potent image of
the war years in many people's minds. The
author George Orwell (1903-1950) mused
many years later: "I have often laughed to think of that recruiting
poster, 'What did you do in the Great War, Daddy?' ... and of all
the men who must have been lured into the army by just that poster
and afterwards despised by their
children."
As the war
dragged on year after year with no end in sight,
British
authorities were compelled to address the civilian
population's
discontent. A new wave of posters produced after
1916 served to rally the home front,
and none performed the feat with
more alacrity than the "atrocity" poster. In seeking to unite
civilians behind the war, designers turned to images of
violence and cruelty that had
been avoided in earlier posters. Red
Cross or Iron Cross?,
by David Wilson (1873-1935), is
one of the finest examples
of this genre, displaying a favorite theme, the
paradox of the inhumanly vicious
German nurse. This is a rare
example of a poster whose effectiveness is driven more by its text
than its illustration
(fig, 3.16). While the image of the nurse and
two German
soldiers is adequate, it lacks the gutwrenching
impact of, for
example, Lumley's stricken father. However,
the last three
lines of text, beginning with "The German 'Sister' pours it on the
ground before his eyes," together create a staccato rhythm that
drives home the brutality of the act. What is most important from a
design point of view is the balance
of forces—image
and text—at play in a poster like this one.
Wilson deftly
used the inexpensive red and black palette to reinforce the message
of the gulf between the conduct of British and German nurses. While
there are, of course, no
confirmed facts behind this poster or others like it, the theme
of the sadistic nurse had particular resonance in England, home
to Florence Nightingale (1820-1910). Nightingale,
a national hero who died in the years just before the war, had
revolutionized the nursing profession, having recognized the
role that sanitation played in morbidity and mortality when she had
worked at the front during the Crimean
War (1854-56). Her story added
further resonance to the
image, in that it became part of an implicit contrast in the
viewer's mind. Wilson, a newspaper cartoonist, became a graphic
designer only for the duration of the war.
|
|
|

|
|
|
3.14 Edward Kealey, Women of Britain Say "GO!"
1915. Poster.
Lithograph on
paper. Imperial War Museum, London.
|
|
|

|
|
|
3.15 Savile Lumley, Daddy, What Did YOU Do in the
Great War?. 1915. Poster.
Lithograph on paper. Imperial War Museum,
London.
|
|
|

|
|
|
3.16 David Wilson, Red Cross or Iron Cross?,
1917. Poster.
Lithograph on
paper. Imperial War Museum, London.
|
|
Canadian War Posters
|
|
At the time of
the First World War, Britain retained its colonial
legacy of
control over the political and military affairs of Canada. Still a
member of the Commonwealth of Nations, Canada in 1914 was a part of
the British Empire, a status quo that was maintained
until the
Statute of Westminster was signed in 1931. Naturally,
Canadian
recruitment posters featured many of the same manipulative appeals
as their British counterparts. Canadian posters also
relied on
realistic illustration, rather than avant-garde abstraction,
in the British
manner. The recruiting poster shown here replicates
the "pointing"
style developed by Alfred Leete, combining the personal appeal of
the hand gesture with a rousing quote
displayed like a
banner at the top of the image (fig. 3.17). The question,
"Are you one of Kitchener's own?", refers to the
specific
regiment that is recruiting, in this case the 244th, based in
Montreal, which was known as "Kitchener's own." In contrast to the
British posters, which made broad national appeals, many
of the Canadian
designs were aimed at specific populations, such
as the men of
the city of Montreal. In a literal display of flag-waving
patriotism, the majority of the poster is taken up with a Union
Jack that appears to be draped
from the top, as it would hang at
local recruiting stations. The uses of the Union Jack, originally a royal
flag, gradually expanded over the centuries and eventually included
its status as an insignia of the British Army. St George's
emblem, a red cross on a white ground, is the dominant motif of
the flag.
Because of
Canada's large French-speaking community, many
posters produced
there, especially in Quebec, were published in both English and
French versions. Starting in 1916, all of the
belligerents in
the war had become reliant on war loans in order to
finance their
armed forces. One poster shows yet another
variation of
the pointing style, with this time a harried-looking soldier at the
front making the direct appeal (fig. 3.18). Instead of
instilling guilt
for the purposes of recruitment, this soldier is urging
French-speaking Canadians to subscribe to a "Victory Loan." The
intensity of his gaze is unparalleled in the pointing genre, and
considering the millions of war casualties suffered by the time this
poster
was produced in 1917, this otherworldly soldier would seem
to be calling
out to his fellow citizens at home from an unmarked
battlefield
grave.
A fine example
of the Canadian penchant for addressing narrow
audiences in order to bolster recruitment can be seen in the
two versions of this poster
aimed at Jewish Canadians, and published
in both English and Yiddish (figs. 3.19, 3.20). This complex
image throws a
multiplicity of themes at the viewer. The banner
slogan at the top makes a rather
universal appeal, invoking a longstanding theme of Judaism that
could refer to everything from the biblical Exodus from Egypt to the
civil and economic rights garnered
during the European Enlightenment in the eighteenth
century. One level below that slogan there are three photos of
famous Jewish Britons integrated
into a collage of Union Jacks,
including in the center a
picture of Rufus Daniel Isaacs, the Lord Chief Justice of Great
Britain, who had joined the peerage in 1914, and become a Viscount
in 1916. Other parts of the appeal
are suggestive of the adventurous
nature of war as well as what is portrayed as a Jewish debt to Great
Britain for their emancipation
in Europe. The man whose bonds
are being severed by a British
soldier says, "You have cut my
bonds and set me free—now let
me help you set others
free!"
|

|

|
3.17 Anonymous, Are You
One of Kitchener's Own?,
1917.
Poster. Lithograph on
paper.
Imperial War Museum, London.
|
3.18 Anonymous,
Souscrivez a L'Emprunt de la
"Victoire,"
1917.
Poster. Canadian War Museum.
|
|
|
 |
|
3.19 & 3.20 Anonymous, Britain Expects Every
Son of Israel to Do His Duty, 1917.
Posters in English and Yiddish. Imperial War Museum,
London. |
|

The United States
|
|
The
United States entered the First World War on the side of the
Allies in April 1917. In the
war's earlier years, the United States
had prospered as its industries
sold millions of tons of munitions and other goods to the Western
Allies. The period between 1915 and 1917 saw increasing tension
between the United States and
Germany as German submarines
attacked merchant ships carrying
these exports, killing a number
of Americans. The American declaration of war followed on the loss of five vessels early in 1917,
after Germany had
implemented a new policy of unrestricted submarine warfare. In the
ensuing year and a half, the American navy assisted Great Britain in
destroying the German submarine threat. In terms of the land war,
the greatest American contribution came in the summer and
autumn of 1918, when army troops under John Pershing (1860-1948)
assisted the Allies in the Meuse-Argonne offensive, which broke
through Germany's Hindenburg
Line. By the end of the war in November 1918, the United States had
deployed nearly 2 million fighting men in France.
German attacks on Allied shipping provoked a number of
prewar contretemps between the United States and Germany. The
most fractious dispute involved the sinking by a German
submarine of the British luxury liner Lusitania on May 7, 1915.
One hundred and twenty-eight Americans were killed in the
attack, which occurred off the coast of Ireland. A sentimental
newspaper report described "a
mother with a three-month old
child clasped tightly in her
arms. Her face wears a half smile. Her
baby's head rests against her breast. No one has tried to separate
them." In Boston, the American illustrator Frederick Spear produced
this image, which became the basis of a recruitment poster
(fig. 3.21).
Perhaps one of the most
compelling atrocity images
ever published, it shows an
ethereal mother and child sinking into the murky depths.
|
|
|

|
|
|
3.21 Frederick Spear, Enlist, 1915. Poster.
Color lithograph.
| |